A Comparison of Invasive and Noninvasive Sensors in the Concealed Information Test

Rapid screening requires identifying individuals concealing information promptly and noninvasively. The standard Concealed Information Test (CIT) is not conducive to a rapid screening context, however, researchers are investigating the ability to conduct adaptations of the CIT using noninvasive sensors. The purpose of this paper is to propose a study that will investigate and compare the accuracy rates of electro dermal, oculometric, and vocalic measures in identifying concealed information. The ability to detect criminals and high-risk individuals rapidly and with stand-off methods during security screening has implications for a wide variety of applications.

[1]  Wolfgang Ambach,et al.  A Concealed Information Test with multimodal measurement. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  Nathan W. Twyman.  Automated Human Screening for Detecting Concealed Knowledge , 2012 .

[3]  Deborah E. Hannula,et al.  The obligatory effects of memory on eye movements , 2007, Memory.

[4]  E. N. Sokolov.  Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex. , 1963, Annual review of physiology.

[5]  N. J. Cohen,et al.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Dirk Wentura,et al.  The revealing glance: Eye gaze behavior to concealed information , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Frank Marchak,et al.  Credibility assessments: operational issues and technology impact for law enforcement applications , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Border Security Credibility Assessments via Heterogeneous Sensor Fusion , 2010, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[9]  David T. Lykken,et al.  The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. , 1960 .

[10]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Vocal Expression of Emotion: Acoustic Properties of Speech Are Associated With Emotional Intensity and Context , 1995 .

[11]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection , 1994 .

[13]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Combining physiological measures in the detection of concealed information , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[14]  B. Goldwater.  Psychological significance of pupillary movements. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  A. Elkins,et al.  The Voice and Eye Gaze Behavior of an Imposter: Automated Interviewing and Detection for Rapid Screening at the Border , 2012 .

[16]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .

[17]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Police Officers’ Lie Detection Accuracy: Interrogating Freely Versus Observing Video , 2004 .

[18]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating orienting and defensive responses. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[19]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[20]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Jum C. Nunnally,et al.  Pupillary response as a general measure of activation , 1967 .

[22]  P. Stoeter,et al.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Berrin Maraşligil,et al.  İnsanlarda Yenilik N2 Yanıtı Hedef Uyaranların Zamansal Sınıflamasını Yansıtır , 2011 .

[24]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Measurement of deceptive voices: Comparing acoustic and perceptual data , 1997, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[25]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Accuracy of Deception Judgments , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[26]  Paula C. Stacey,et al.  Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[27]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Interrogating to detect deception and truth : effects of strategic use of evidence , 2005 .

[28]  D. Lykken,et al.  Psychology and the lie detector industry. , 1974, The American psychologist.

[29]  Makoto Nakayama,et al.  Specific and Reactive Sensitivities of Skin Resistance Response and Respiratory Apnea in a Japanese Concealed Information Test (CIT) of Criminal Guilt. , 2004 .

[30]  D. Lykken.  The GSR in the detection of guilt. , 1959 .