p-Dominance and Equilibrium Selection under Perfect Foresight Dynamics

This paper studies equilibrium selection based on a class of perfect foresight dynamics and relates it to the notion of p-dominance. A continuum of rational players are repeatedly and randomly matched to play a symmetric n n game. There are frictions: opportunities to revise actions follow independent Poisson processes. The dynamics has stationary states, each of which corresponds to a Nash equilibrium of the static game. A strict Nash equilibrium is linearly stable under the perfect foresight dynamics if, independently of the current action distribution, there exists a consistent belief that any player necessarily plays the Nash equilibrium action at every revision opportunity. It is shown that a strict Nash equilibrium is linearly stable under the perfect foresight dynamics with a small degree of friction if and only if it is the p-dominant equilibrium with p < 1=2. It is also shown that if a strict Nash equilibrium is the p-dominant equilibrium with p < 1=2, then it is uniquely absorbing (and globally accessible) for a small friction (but not vice versa). Set-valued stability concepts are introduced and their existence is shown. Journal of Economic Literature Classication Numbers: C72, C73.

[1]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Perfect Foresight and Equilibrium Selection in Symmetric Potential Games , 1998 .

[2]  Peter Secretan Learning , 1965, Mental Health.

[3]  S. Morris,et al.  The Robustness of Equilibria to Incomplete Information , 1997 .

[4]  H. Carlsson,et al.  Global Games and Equilibrium Selection , 1993 .

[5]  K. Burdzy,et al.  Fast Equilibrium Selection by Rational Players Living in a Changing World , 2001 .

[6]  Toshimasa Maruta,et al.  On the Relationship Between Risk-Dominance and Stochastic Stability , 1997 .

[7]  R. Rob,et al.  Bandwagon Effects and Long Run Technology Choice , 2010 .

[8]  J. Yorke,et al.  Basins of Attraction , 1996, Science.

[9]  Akihiko Matsui,et al.  Best response dynamics and socially stable strategies , 1992 .

[10]  Daisuke Oyama,et al.  Rationalizable Foresight Dynamics: Evolution and Rationalizability , 2002 .

[11]  Stephen Morris,et al.  P-dominance and belief potential , 2010 .

[12]  H. Young,et al.  The Evolution of Conventions , 1993 .

[13]  Stephen Morris,et al.  Equilibrium Selection in Global Games with Strategic Complementarities , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  Kiminori Matsuyama,et al.  An Approach to Equilibrium Selection , 1995 .

[15]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Social Stability and Equilibrium , 1991 .

[16]  Glenn Ellison Basins of Attraction, Long-Run Stochastic Stability, and the Speed of Step-by-Step Evolution , 2000 .

[17]  J. Nash NON-COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1951, Classics in Game Theory.

[18]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Общая теория выбора равновесия в играх / A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games , 1989 .

[19]  R. Rob,et al.  Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games , 1993 .

[20]  Youngse Kim,et al.  Equilibrium Selection inn-Person Coordination Games , 1996 .

[21]  Takashi Ui,et al.  Robust Equilibria of Potential Games , 2001 .

[22]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  A differential Game Approach to Evolutionary Equilibrium Selection , 2002, IGTR.