Will structure-environment-fit result in better port performance? —An empirical test on the validity of Matching Framework Theory

Abstract Although Matching Framework Theory (MFT) was introduced to explain inconsistencies in the port performance literature more than two decades ago, empirical studies to test its validity are absent. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study—focusing on one dimension of MFT, structure-environment-fit—and its impact on port performance. We deliberately select the Chinese container terminal industry (2004–2014) to test the proposed theory. We assume that the 2008 Financial Crisis in the middle of our observation period significantly changed the original structure-environment-fit state in the context, thereby resulting in a different impact on port performance. The event study research design also enables us to examine the influence of structure-environment-fit on port performance, while leaving other variables relatively stable. A multivariate analysis model in the truncated double bootstrapping method, median regression and a meta-frontier analysis are applied to prove our hypotheses. The results obtained based on data of 56 Chinese container terminals from 2004 to 2014 confirm that structure-environment-fit results in better port performance.

[1]  A. Zhang,et al.  Effects of competition and policy changes on Chinese airport productivity: An empirical investigation , 2008 .

[2]  C. Vance,et al.  Managing a Global Workforce: Challenges and Opportunities in International Human Resource Management , 2006 .

[3]  P. Panayides,et al.  The effect of institutional factors on public–private partnership success in ports , 2015 .

[4]  Mary R. Brooks,et al.  Sea change in liner shipping : regulation and managerial decision-making in a global industry , 2000 .

[5]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[6]  K. Cullinane,et al.  Chapter 26 Conclusions and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[7]  Iris F. A. Vis,et al.  Port supply chain integration: analyzing biofuel supply chains , 2016 .

[8]  Sergio Jara-Díaz,et al.  Multioutput analysis of cargo handling firms: An application to a Spanish port , 2005 .

[9]  Michael R Chernick,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers , 2007 .

[10]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[11]  Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences Around IAS/IFRS Adoptions , 2013 .

[12]  Gi-Tae Yeo,et al.  Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China , 2008 .

[13]  Anthony Kenneth Charles Beresford,et al.  Transhipment Port Selection and Decision-making Behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese Case , 2003 .

[14]  Peter Wanke,et al.  Determinants of Efficiency at Major Brazilian Port Terminals , 2011 .

[15]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[16]  Scott A. Snell,et al.  External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research‐intensive industries , 1988 .

[17]  A. Baird,et al.  Chapter 3 Port Privatisation in the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[18]  M. Theodosiou,et al.  Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization , 2006 .

[19]  Srilata Zaheer.  Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness , 1995 .

[20]  Julie Chesley,et al.  Strategic Management: A Managerial Perspective , 1998 .

[21]  T. Dunning.  Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach , 2012 .

[22]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[23]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry, 1989–2001 , 2009 .

[24]  Dong-Wook Song,et al.  Evaluating impacts of institutional reforms on port efficiency changes: Ownership, corporate structure, and total factor productivity changes of world container ports , 2010 .

[25]  Leonardo Ramos Rios,et al.  Analysing the Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals of Mercosur using DEA , 2006 .

[26]  Bingliang Song,et al.  Productivity Changes in Chinese Container Terminals 2006-2011 , 2013 .

[27]  Gabriel Figueiredo de Oliveira,et al.  The impact of competition on container port (in)efficiency , 2015 .

[28]  John T. Starr,et al.  THE MID-ATLANTIC LOAD CENTRE -- BALTIMORE OR HAMPTON ROADS? / , 1994 .

[29]  R. Amit,et al.  The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance , 2008 .

[30]  Su-Han Woo,et al.  Liner shipping networks, port characteristics and the impact on port performance , 2017 .

[31]  Theodore Syriopoulos,et al.  Port governance models: Financial evaluation of Greek port restructuring , 2007 .

[32]  E. Zajac,et al.  THE STRATEGY/GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE FIT RELATIONSHIP: THEORY AND EVIDENCE IN FRANCHISING ARRANGEMENTS , 2004 .

[33]  V. Gekara,et al.  Upstream transport corridor inefficiencies and the implications for port performance: a case analysis of Mombasa Port and the Northern Corridor , 2013 .

[34]  John J. Liu,et al.  The port and maritime industries in the post-2008 world: Challenges and opportunities , 2010 .

[35]  Francisco de Sousa Ramos,et al.  Cluster analysis of the competitiveness of container ports in Brazil , 2014 .

[36]  A. Rasheed,et al.  The liability of foreignness in capital markets: Sources and remedies , 2011, Journal of International Business Studies.

[37]  Jie Wu,et al.  Performance evaluation of Chinese port enterprises under significant environmental concerns: An extended DEA-based analysis , 2017 .

[38]  Michael Dowling,et al.  Cooperative strategy and new venture performance: The role of business strategy and management experience , 1995 .

[39]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis , 2006 .

[40]  Jordan Schwartz,et al.  Exploring the drivers of port efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean , 2016 .

[41]  Charles P. Kindleberger,et al.  American Business Abroad : Six Lectures on Direct Investment , 1969 .

[42]  P. Panayides,et al.  Global supply chain and port/terminal: integration and competitiveness , 2008 .

[43]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  Technical efficiency of European railways: a distance function approach , 2000 .

[44]  Waiman Cheung,et al.  Foreign participation and competition: A way to improve the container port efficiency in China? , 2013 .

[45]  Mary R. Brooks,et al.  Chapter 17 Port Governance, Devolution and the Matching Framework: A Configuration Theory Approach , 2006 .

[46]  J. Child,et al.  The Dynamics of Influence in Corporate Co‐Evolution , 2012 .

[47]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  A multioutput cost function for the services of Spanish ports' infrastructure , 2002 .

[48]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Two-stage DEA: caveat emptor , 2011 .

[49]  Beatriz Tovar,et al.  Metafrontier analysis on productivity for West Coast of South Pacific terminals , 2017 .

[50]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Malmquist Productivity Indexes: A Survey of Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[51]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[52]  Rudy R. Negenborn,et al.  Centralization or decentralization: A comparative analysis of port regulation modes , 2014 .

[53]  Y Roll,et al.  Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 1993 .