Anomalous scaling law of strength and toughness of cellulose nanopaper

Significance A long-standing challenge in material design is to overcome the conflict between strength and toughness, because they are generally mutually exclusive. To address this challenge, we rationally design cellulose-based nanopaper and investigate the dependence of their mechanical properties on constituent cellulose fiber size. Surprisingly, we find that both the strength and toughness of the nanopaper increase simultaneously (40 and 130 times, respectively) as the average diameter of constituent cellulose fibers decreases from 27 μm to 11 nm, suggesting the promising potential toward an anomalous but highly desirable scaling law: the smaller, the stronger and the tougher. There are abundant opportunities to use the fundamental bottom-up strategy to design a novel class of functional materials that are both strong and tough. The quest for both strength and toughness is perpetual in advanced material design; unfortunately, these two mechanical properties are generally mutually exclusive. So far there exists only limited success of attaining both strength and toughness, which often needs material-specific, complicated, or expensive synthesis processes and thus can hardly be applicable to other materials. A general mechanism to address the conflict between strength and toughness still remains elusive. Here we report a first-of-its-kind study of the dependence of strength and toughness of cellulose nanopaper on the size of the constituent cellulose fibers. Surprisingly, we find that both the strength and toughness of cellulose nanopaper increase simultaneously (40 and 130 times, respectively) as the size of the constituent cellulose fibers decreases (from a mean diameter of 27 μm to 11 nm), revealing an anomalous but highly desirable scaling law of the mechanical properties of cellulose nanopaper: the smaller, the stronger and the tougher. Further fundamental mechanistic studies reveal that reduced intrinsic defect size and facile (re)formation of strong hydrogen bonding among cellulose molecular chains is the underlying key to this new scaling law of mechanical properties. These mechanistic findings are generally applicable to other material building blocks, and therefore open up abundant opportunities to use the fundamental bottom-up strategy to design a new class of functional materials that are both strong and tough.

[1]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone , 2003, Nature materials.

[2]  A. Evans.  Perspective on the Development of High‐Toughness Ceramics , 1990 .

[3]  W. Johnson,et al.  Fracture toughness and crack-resistance curve behavior in metallic glass-matrix composites , 2009 .

[4]  Silvo Hribernik,et al.  Plant Fibres for Textile and Technical Applications , 2013 .

[5]  Richard E. Smalley,et al.  Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Films , 2003 .

[6]  D. Klemm,et al.  Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  K. Lu,et al.  Strengthening Materials by Engineering Coherent Internal Boundaries at the Nanoscale , 2009, Science.

[8]  A. Gandini,et al.  Novel transparent nanocomposite films based on chitosan and bacterial cellulose , 2009 .

[9]  Yongqiang Dong,et al.  Wrapping Carbon Nanotubes in Pyrene-Containing Poly(phenylacetylene) Chains: Solubility, Stability, Light Emission, and Surface Photovoltaic Properties , 2006 .

[10]  R. Ritchie.  The conflicts between strength and toughness. , 2011, Nature materials.

[11]  Zheng Jia,et al.  Tin anode for sodium-ion batteries using natural wood fiber as a mechanical buffer and electrolyte reservoir. , 2013, Nano letters.

[12]  G. Chinga-Carrasco.  Cellulose fibres, nanofibrils and microfibrils: The morphological sequence of MFC components from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view , 2011, Nanoscale research letters.

[13]  Jaakko V. I. Timonen,et al.  Multifunctional High‐Performance Biofibers Based on Wet‐Extrusion of Renewable Native Cellulose Nanofibrils , 2011, Advanced materials.

[14]  M. Desjarlais,et al.  First-principles and classical molecular dynamics simulation of shocked polymers , 2010 .

[15]  R. Rivlin,et al.  Rupture of rubber. I. Characteristic energy for tearing , 1953 .

[16]  Julien Bras,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose - its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. , 2012, Carbohydrate polymers.

[17]  R O Ritchie,et al.  The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. , 2008, Nature materials.

[18]  R. Ritchie,et al.  On the Fracture Toughness of Advanced Materials , 2009 .

[19]  Julia R Greer,et al.  Transition from a strong-yet-brittle to a stronger-and-ductile state by size reduction of metallic glasses. , 2010, Nature materials.

[20]  Steven D. Lacey,et al.  Hybridizing wood cellulose and graphene oxide toward high-performance fibers , 2015 .

[21]  Steve Weiner,et al.  THE MATERIAL BONE: Structure-Mechanical Function Relations , 1998 .

[22]  A. Mantalaris,et al.  Creating Hierarchical Structures in Renewable Composites by Attaching Bacterial Cellulose onto Sisal Fibers , 2008 .

[23]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites , 2010, Journal of Materials Science.

[24]  R. Ritchie.  Mechanisms of fatigue crack propagation in metals, ceramics and composites: Role of crack tip shielding☆ , 1988 .

[25]  F. Sansoz,et al.  Near-ideal strength in gold nanowires achieved through microstructural design. , 2009, ACS nano.

[26]  H. Sehaqui,et al.  Wood cellulose biocomposites with fibrous structures at micro- and nanoscale , 2011 .

[27]  Akira Isogai,et al.  TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[28]  Zhiqiang Fang,et al.  Novel nanostructured paper with ultrahigh transparency and ultrahigh haze for solar cells. , 2014, Nano letters.

[29]  S. Keten,et al.  Traction-separation laws and stick-slip shear phenomenon of interfaces between cellulose nanocrystals , 2015 .

[30]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Dislocation nucleation governed softening and maximum strength in nano-twinned metals , 2010, Nature.

[31]  S. Mao,et al.  Deformation mechanisms of face-centered-cubic metal nanowires with twin boundaries , 2007 .

[32]  Haiyan Wang,et al.  Epitaxial nanotwinned Cu films with high strength and high conductivity , 2008 .

[33]  Robert O Ritchie,et al.  A damage-tolerant glass. , 2011, Nature materials.

[34]  Julia R. Greer,et al.  Plasticity in small-sized metallic systems: Intrinsic versus extrinsic size effect , 2011 .

[35]  Xiaoxu Huang,et al.  Revealing the Maximum Strength in Nanotwinned Copper , 2009, Science.

[36]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[37]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Deformation mechanisms in nanotwinned metal nanopillars. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[38]  Hiroyuki Yano,et al.  Optically Transparent Composites Reinforced with Networks of Bacterial Nanofibers , 2005 .

[39]  H. Khalil,et al.  Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review , 2012 .

[40]  S. Suresh,et al.  Strength, strain-rate sensitivity and ductility of copper with nanoscale twins , 2006 .

[41]  Douglas C. Hofmann,et al.  Designing metallic glass matrix composites with high toughness and tensile ductility , 2008, Nature.

[42]  C. Bittencourt,et al.  Radio-frequency plasma functionalization of carbon nanotubes surface O2, NH3, and CF4 treatments , 2005 .

[43]  A. G. Thomas.  Rupture of rubber , 1962 .

[44]  Ting Zhu,et al.  Ultra-strength materials , 2010 .

[45]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Nanoscale deformation mechanisms in bone. , 2009, Nano letters.

[46]  Dieter Klemm,et al.  Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[47]  Lei Lu,et al.  Ultrahigh Strength and High Electrical Conductivity in Copper , 2004, Science.

[48]  A. Martini,et al.  Atomistic Simulation of Frictional Sliding Between Cellulose Iβ Nanocrystals , 2013, Tribology Letters.

[49]  Liangbing Hu,et al.  Carbon nanotube thin films: fabrication, properties, and applications. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[50]  Deepak Vashishth,et al.  Rising crack-growth-resistance behavior in cortical bone: implications for toughness measurements. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  W. Johnson,et al.  Shear bands and cracking of metallic glass plates in bending , 2003 .

[52]  R. Ritchie,et al.  On the Mechanistic Origins of Toughness in Bone , 2010 .

[53]  Ashlie Martini,et al.  Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[54]  Alain Dufresne,et al.  Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.