Real-Time Kinematic, Temporospatial, and Kinetic Biofeedback During Gait Retraining in Patients: A Systematic Review

Background Biofeedback has been used in rehabilitation settings for gait retraining. Purpose The purpose of this review was to summarize and synthesize the findings of studies involving real-time kinematic, temporospatial, and kinetic biofeedback. The goal was to provide a general overview of the effectiveness of these forms of biofeedback in treating gait abnormalities. Data Sources Articles were identified through searches of the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. All searches were limited to the English language and encompassed the period from 1965 to November 2007. Study Selection Titles and abstracts were screened to identify studies that met the following requirements: the study included the use of kinematic, temporospatial, or kinetic biofeedback during gait training, and the population of interest showed abnormal movement patterns as a result of a pathology or injury. Data Extraction All articles that met the inclusion criteria were assessed by use of the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies. Data Synthesis Seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Effect sizes were calculated for the primary outcome variables for all studies that provided enough data. Effect sizes generally suggested moderate to large treatment effects for all methods of biofeedback during practice. Limitations Several of the studies lacked adequate randomization; therefore, readers should exercise caution when interpreting authors’ conclusions. Conclusions Each biofeedback method appeared to result in moderate to large treatment effects immediately after treatment. However, it is unknown whether the effects were maintained. Future studies should ensure adequate randomization of participants and implementation of motor learning concepts and should include retention testing to assess the long-term success of biofeedback and outcome measures capable of demonstrating coordinative changes in gait and improvement in function.

[1]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  W. Harris,et al.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J V Basmajian,et al.  Biofeedback treatment of foot-drop after stroke compared with standard rehabilitation technique: effects on voluntary control and strength. , 1975, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  S. Wolf,et al.  Evaluation of electromyographic biofeedback as an adjunct to therapeutic exercise in treating the lower extremities of hemiplegic patients. , 1981, Physical therapy.

[5]  D. Bursill,et al.  Electromyographic feedback in the remobilization of stroke patients: a controlled trial. , 1982, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[8]  M. Tinetti Performance‐Oriented Assessment of Mobility Problems in Elderly Patients , 1986, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  Cozean Cd,et al.  Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. , 1988 .

[10]  W S Pease,et al.  Biofeedback and functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  J. G. Williams,et al.  The two-period crossover design in medical research. , 1989, Annals of internal medicine.

[12]  A R Mandel,et al.  Electromyographic versus rhythmic positional biofeedback in computerized gait retraining with stroke patients. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  L. Wolfson,et al.  Gait assessment in the elderly: a gait abnormality rating scale and its relation to falls. , 1990, Journal of gerontology.

[14]  M. Morris,et al.  Electrogoniometric feedback: its effect on genu recurvatum in stroke. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  S. Olney,et al.  Feedback of ankle joint angle and soleus electromyography in the rehabilitation of hemiplegic gait. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Grasso,et al.  Rehabilitation of Walking With Electromyographic Biofeedback in Foot‐Drop After Stroke , 1994, Stroke.

[17]  S Naumann,et al.  Feedback of triceps surae EMG in gait of children with cerebral palsy: a controlled study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  R N Singer,et al.  Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  Howard N. Zelaznik,et al.  Advances in Motor Learning and Control , 1996 .

[20]  C. Winstein,et al.  Learning a partial-weight-bearing skill: effectiveness of two forms of feedback. , 1996, Physical Therapy.

[21]  D. Rose A Multilevel Approach to the Study of Motor Control and Learning , 1996 .

[22]  E. Ceceli,et al.  Comparison of joint-position biofeedback and conventional therapy methods in Genu recurvatum after stroke - 6 months' follow-up , 1996 .

[23]  L. Bradley,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback for gait training after stroke , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  J. Moreland,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback to improve lower extremity function after stroke: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  J. Petrofsky,et al.  The use of electromyogram biofeedback to reduce Trendelenburg gait , 2001, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[26]  K. Slim,et al.  Methodological index for non‐randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument , 2003, ANZ journal of surgery.

[27]  Alexander S Aruin,et al.  Base of support feedback in gait rehabilitation , 2003, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[28]  Complementary therapies in rehabilitation , 2004 .

[29]  S. White,et al.  Altering asymmetric limb loading after hip arthroplasty using real-time dynamic feedback when walking. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  P. Bessou,et al.  Step-length biofeedback device for walk rehabilitation , 1994, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[31]  E. Isakov Gait rehabilitation: a new biofeedback device for monitoring and enhancing weight-bearing over the affected lower limb. , 2007, Europa medicophysica.

[32]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful , 2007, Stroke.

[33]  C. Price,et al.  EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.