Individuality of handwriting.

Motivated by several rulings in United States courts concerning expert testimony in general, and handwriting testimony in particular, we undertook a study to objectively validate the hypothesis that handwriting is individual. Handwriting samples of 1,500 individuals, representative of the U.S. population with respect to gender, age, ethnic groups, etc., were obtained. Analyzing differences in handwriting was done by using computer algorithms for extracting features from scanned images of handwriting. Attributes characteristic of the handwriting were obtained, e.g., line separation, slant, character shapes, etc. These attributes, which are a subset of attributes used by forensic document examiners (FDEs), were used to quantitatively establish individuality by using machine learning approaches. Using global attributes of handwriting and very few characters in the writing, the ability to determine the writer with a high degree of confidence was established. The work is a step towards providing scientific support for admitting handwriting evidence in court. The mathematical approach and the resulting software also have the promise of aiding the FDE.

[1]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Gradient-based contour encoding for character recognition , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  Roy Huber,et al.  Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals , 1999 .

[3]  Joseph A. Hauptmann Proposed modifications of the high school physics curriculum in light of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 1997 .

[4]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[5]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  Sampling: Design and Analysis , 2000 .

[6]  Geetha Srikantan,et al.  Comparison of normalization methods for character recognition , 1995, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition.

[7]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Bayesian and neural network pattern recognition: a theoretical connection and empirical results with handwritten characters , 1991 .

[8]  Charles J. Wysocki,et al.  Hand preference and age in the United States , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Herbert Freeman,et al.  On the Encoding of Arbitrary Geometric Configurations , 1961, IRE Trans. Electron. Comput..

[10]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[11]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Interpretation of handwritten addresses in US mailstream , 1993, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR '93).

[12]  Gyeonghwan Kim,et al.  A Lexicon Driven Approach to Handwritten Word Recognition for Real-Time Applications , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Handprinted character/digit recognition using a multiple feature/resolution philos-ophy , 1994 .

[14]  Sargur N. Srihari,et al.  Recognition of handwritten and machine-printed text for postal address interpretation , 1993, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  Boris Mirkin,et al.  Mathematical Classification and Clustering , 1996 .