TOF PET offset calibration from clinical data

In this paper, we present a timing calibration technique for time-of-flight positron emission tomography (TOF PET) that eliminates the need for a specialized data acquisition. By eliminating the acquisition, the process becomes fully automated, and can be performed with any clinical data set and whenever computing resources are available. It also can be applied retroactively to datasets for which a TOF offset calibration is missing or suboptimal. Since the method can use an arbitrary data set to perform a calibration prior to a TOF reconstruction, possibly of the same data set, one also can view this as reconstruction from uncalibrated data. We present a performance comparison with existing calibration techniques.

[1]  J. Karp,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation of a 3D PET Single Scatter Simulation with TOF Modeling , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[2]  M.E. Casey,et al.  A central positron source to perform the timing alignment of detectors in a PET scanner , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  S. Surti,et al.  Characterization of a time-of-flight PET scanner based on lanthanum bromide , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[4]  Ziad Burbar,et al.  Coincidence time alignment of high resolution planar detectors , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[5]  D. Townsend,et al.  An Assessment of the Impact of Incorporating Time-of-Flight Information into Clinical PET/CT Imaging , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  D. Townsend,et al.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  J. Karp,et al.  Improvement in Lesion Detection with Whole-Body Oncologic Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  M. Casey,et al.  A central positron source to perform the timing alignment of detectors in a PET scanner , 2005 .

[9]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  S. Siegel,et al.  Digital Time Alignment of High Resolution PET Inveon Block Detectors , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[11]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  J. Karp,et al.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  I. Buvat,et al.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Whole-Body Oncologic Studies: A Human Observer Lesion Detection and Localization Study , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Time of flight coincidence timing calibration techniques using radioactive sources , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.