CHEMICALLY CLEANING OF UF MEMBRANES FOULED BY OILY WASTE WATER

The Ultra filtration membranes are used for treatment and reused of oily waste waters. The fouling of the ultra filtration membranes is caused due to inorganic and organic materials present in waste water that adhere to the surface and pores of the membranes and resulted in fouling and deterioration perforformance with increase in cost of energy and membranes replacement. In this experiment, Ultra filtration membranes fouling and cleaning were performed with oily waste water and selecting cleaning agents using laboratory scale cross flow membrane test unit. The result showed that the combination of cleaning agent that is metal chelating agent (Ethylene diamine tetraactetic acid) and an surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium hydroxide were able to clean fouled membranes very effectively than the individual cleaning agent. The flux recovery percentage was found to improve with increasing cross flow velocity, temperature, pH and concentration of the cleaning solutions. Keywords-ultrafiltration; fouling; cleaning; surfactant; oily waste water. I. INTRODUCTION The fouling of membranes is typically caused by inorganic and organic materials that adhere to the surface and pores of the membrane and result in deterioration of performance (reduce flux of the membrane) with consequent increase in costs of energy and membrane replacement. A. Fundamental of Separation The forces of interaction between the membrane surface and particles in the solution are important in understanding the fouling phenomena. The normal basis for quantifying particle surface interaction is DLVO theory where the particle surface interactions in aqueous environments could be predicted by the summation of van der Waals and electrostatic double layer forces. Reducing the interaction between the particles and the membranes as much possible can reduce the fouling phenomena. This can be achieved when the critical value (flux and pressure) arises as a balance between the hydrodynamic force driving solute towards the pore and electrostatic forces opposing the motion. Critical flux stems from the concept that the higher the flux the stronger is the drag force towards the membranes. The stronger concentration polarization and higher the compaction of particles. Critical flux is defined as the limiting flux value below which a flux decline over time does not occur.(1).the number of parameter influenced this critical flux have been discussed in detail can be found(2).It is maintained that if one operates below the critical flux the fouling can be avoided or minimized. The fouling is common to all types of membrane separation. B. Fouling Membranes fouling are an extremely complex phenomenon that has not been defined precisely. In general the term used to describe the undesirable formation of deposits on membrane surfaces. This occurs when rejected particles are not transported from the surface of the membrane back to the bulk stream. The foul ant are typically colloidal materials of one types or another and their properties and interaction with membranes dominant fouling /cleaning processes. Colloids are defined as fine suspended particles in the size range of few nanometers to few micrometers. Examples of common colloids sizes foulant includes inorganic(clay, silica salt and metal

[1]  C. Boyd Assessment, Optimization, And Enhancement Of Ultrafiltration (uf) Membrane Processes In Potable Water Treatment , 2013 .

[2]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[3]  Simon Judd,et al.  Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: A review , 2010 .

[4]  Toraj Mohammadi,et al.  Chemical cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes in the milk industry , 2007 .

[5]  A. Mohammed Farooque,et al.  Performance restoration and autopsy of NF membranes used in seawater pretreatment , 2005 .

[6]  Jian Chen,et al.  Chemical cleaning of PS ultrafilters fouled by the fermentation broth of glutamic acid , 2005 .

[7]  A. Fane,et al.  Natural organic matter removal by nanofiltration: effects of solution chemistry on retention of low molar mass acids versus bulk organic matter , 2004 .

[8]  Krzysztof Wandachowicz,et al.  The nucleation kinetic aspects of gypsum nanofiltration membrane scaling , 2004 .

[9]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Tools for fouling diagnosis of NF and RO membranes and assessment of the fouling potential of feed water , 2003 .

[10]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Flux decline in nanofiltration due to adsorption of organic compounds , 2002 .

[11]  M. Mänttäri,et al.  Fouling effects of polysaccharides and humic acid in nanofiltration , 2000 .

[12]  T. V. Knyazkova,et al.  Recognition of membrane fouling: testing of theoretical approaches with data on NF of salt solutions containing a low molecular weight surfactant as a foulant☆ , 1999 .

[13]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration , 1999 .

[14]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  The promise of membrane technology , 1999 .

[15]  J. Hofman,et al.  Biofouling of membranes for drinking water production , 1998 .

[16]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Nanofiltration of Natural Organic Matter: Removal, Fouling and the Influence of Multivalent Ions , 1998 .

[17]  M. Nyström,et al.  Cleaning results characterized by flux, streaming potential and FTIR measurements , 1998 .

[18]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes , 1997 .

[19]  C. Bouchard,et al.  Study of humic acid adsorption on nanofiltration membranes by contact angle measurements , 1997 .

[20]  F. Digiano,et al.  Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration , 1996 .

[21]  M. Abe,et al.  Removal of dissolved humic substances from water with a reverse osmosis membrane , 1992 .

[22]  Abdullah Al-Hamdan,et al.  Performance evaluation of SWCC SWRO plants , 1989 .

[23]  TalalK. Osta,et al.  Pretreatment System in Reverse Osmosis Plants , 1987 .

[24]  Clive A. Edwards,et al.  Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water: Geochemistry, Isolation, and Characterization.George R. Aiken , Diane M. McKnight , Robert L. Wershaw , Patrick MacCarthy , 1986 .

[25]  P. Given Book Review: Humic substances in soil, sediment and water. edited by G.R. Aiken, D.M. McKnight, R.L. Wershaw and P. MacCarthy, 1985, Wiley-Interscience, 692 p., £61.35 , 1986 .

[26]  S. S. Wang,et al.  A critical review of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes , 1981 .

[27]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURES OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES , 1980 .