The typical company car user does not exist: The case of Flemish company car drivers

Abstract In recent years the use of company cars has gained a lot of importance. In Belgium, they are increasingly used by companies as an incentive to motivate and compensate employees, resulting in the fact that half of the new car registrations are nowadays made in the name of a company and that companies account for 10% of the Belgian car fleet. In many cases the company car can also be used for private trips. In addition, most costs related to the use of a company car are borne by the employer, turning company cars into a nearly free way of travelling for the employee. Research has already established that the yearly amount of kilometres driven with a company car is significantly higher than that of private cars (e.g., Hubert and Toint, 2002; De Witte et al., 2009 ). Consequently, the rising phenomenon of company cars and its impact on our daily mobility can no longer be ignored. The aim of this paper is to explore the travel behaviours of company car users to make recommendations towards policy makers. This paper uses cluster analysis to show that there is no such thing as the ‘typical’ company car user. Three types of company car users were identified, each using their company car for different reasons and therefore each requiring different policy actions.

[1]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Comparing urban activity travel behaviour , 2001 .

[2]  D. Hensher,et al.  Trip chaining as a barrier to the propensity to use public transport , 2000 .

[3]  J. Kenworthy,et al.  Automobile dependence in cities: An international comparison of urban transport and land use patterns with implications for sustainability , 1996 .

[4]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Some estimation results of a simultaneous model of auto ownership and mode choice to work , 1974 .

[5]  Eran Feitelson,et al.  The Political Economy of Transport Innovations , 2004 .

[6]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Estimating individual driving distance by car and public transport use in Sweden , 2002 .

[7]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Structures of commitment in mode use: a comparison of Switzerland, Germany and Great Britain , 2001 .

[8]  Galit Cohen-Blankshtain Institutional constraints on transport policymaking: the case of company cars in Israel , 2008 .

[9]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Transport-Related Fringe Benefits: Implications for Moving and the Journey to Work , 2006 .

[10]  Janet Dickinson,et al.  Travelling to work: will people move out of their cars , 2001 .

[11]  M. Dijst,et al.  The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium- and longer-distance trips , 2006 .

[12]  Company Car Taxation , 2010 .

[13]  Jean-Paul Hubert,et al.  La mobilite quotidienne des belges. , 2002 .

[14]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  How persuasive is 'free' public transport?: A survey among commuters in the Brussels Capital Region , 2008 .

[15]  P. Rietveld Pricing mobility. Experiences in The Netherlands , 2001 .