UNDERSTANDING PLAYFUL USER EXPERIENCE THROUGH DIGITAL GAMES

It has been commonly acknowledged that the acceptance of a product depends on both its utilitarian and non-utilitarian properties. The non-utilitarian properties can elicit generally pleasurable and particularly playful experiences in the product’s users. Product design needs to improve the support of playful experiences in order to fit in with the users’ multi-faceted needs. However, designing for fun and pleasure is not an easy task, and there is an urgent need in user experience research and design practices to better understand the role of playfulness in overall user experience of the product. In this paper, we present an initial framework of playful experiences which are derived from studies in interactive art and videogames. We conducted a user study to verify that these experiences are valid. We interviewed 13 videogame players about their experiences with games and what triggers these experiences. The results indicate that the players are experiencing the videogames in many different ways which can be categorized using the framework. We propose that the framework could help the design of interactive products from an experience point of view and make them more engaging, attractive, and most importantly, more playful for the users.

[1]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play in Work and Games. , 1977 .

[2]  Jane Webster,et al.  Making computer tasks at work more playful: Implications for systems analysts and designers , 1988, SIGCPR '88.

[3]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[4]  B. Sutton-Smith,et al.  The Ambiguity of Play , 2000 .

[5]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: stable or dynamic trait? , 1997, DATB.

[6]  R. Stebbins.  Casual leisure: a conceptual statement , 1997 .

[7]  M. Kubovy,et al.  On the pleasures of the mind. , 1999 .

[8]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers , 2000, DIS '00.

[9]  T. J. Reynolds,et al.  Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. , 2001 .

[10]  Randy J. Pagulayan,et al.  User-centered design in games , 2012 .

[11]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Exploring the theoretical foundations of playfulness in computer interactions , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model , 2002 .

[13]  Richard Bartle,et al.  Designing Virtual Worlds , 2003 .

[14]  Anu Kankainen,et al.  UCPCD: user-centered product concept design , 2003, DUX '03.

[15]  Gonzalo Frasca,et al.  Ludologists love stories, too: notes from a debate that never took place , 2003, DiGRA Conference.

[16]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Learning from Games: HCI Design Innovations in Entertainment Software , 2003, Graphics Interface.

[17]  Robert Zubek,et al.  MDA : A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research , 2004 .

[18]  Marshall W. Fishwick,et al.  Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things , 2004 .

[19]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing for fun: how can we design user interfaces to be more fun? , 2004, INTR.

[20]  Tracy Fullerton,et al.  Game Design Workshop: Designing, Prototyping, and Playtesting Games , 2004 .

[21]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  MARC HASSENZAHL CHAPTER 3 The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product , 2003 .

[22]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games , 2005, CIE.

[23]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Andrew Sears,et al.  WHY WE PLAY: AFFECT AND THE FUN OF GAMES: Designing Emotions for Games, Entertainment Interfaces and Interactive Products , 2007 .

[25]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[26]  K. Poels,et al.  "It is always a lot of fun!": exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology , 2007, Future Play.

[27]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  How motivational orientation influences the evaluation and choice of hedonic and pragmatic interactive products: The role of regulatory focus , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[29]  J Holopainen.  Play, games, and fun , 2008 .