The Effectiveness of Administrative Reform in New Democracies

Practitioners and scholars of postcommunist politics disagree on the accomplishments of administrative reforms in new Eastern European democracies. The transformation of the public sector after 1989 has aimed to consolidate the democratic process and enhance economic development. Skeptics, however, argue that administrative reforms face serious challenges in the context of economic liberalization, insufficient capacity for modernization, and cultural legacies of the past. The authors judge reform effectiveness by testing the impact of civil service reform on government transparency and foreign direct investment. The results of the empirical analysis confirm that once reform is adopted, administrations become more effective at reducing corruption and attracting investment. Despite the delays and difficulties of implementation, the adoption of reform is important in and of itself, and countries can expect positive results sooner than skeptics predict.

[1]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Bank Credit Availability , 2002 .

[2]  H. Wollmann,et al.  Governmentalizing central executives in post-communist Europe: a four-country comparison , 2001 .

[3]  Mark Gray,et al.  International Integration and National Corruption , 2003, International Organization.

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[5]  K. Goetz.  Making sense of post-communist central administration: modernization, Europeanization or Latinization? , 2001 .

[6]  S. Estrin,et al.  The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies , 2004 .

[7]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Hector E. Schamis.  Re-Forming the State: The Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe , 2002 .

[9]  F. Steves,et al.  Anti-Corruption Programmes in Post-Communist Transition Countries and Changes in the Business Environment, 1999-2002 , 2003 .

[10]  T. Rudel,et al.  The Context for Political Corruption: A Cross‐National Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  L. Holmes.  Corruption and the crisis of the post-communist state , 1997 .

[12]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004 , 2005 .

[13]  James E. Rauch,et al.  BUREAUCRACY AND GROWTH: A CROSS-NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF "WEBERIAN" STATE STRUCTURES ON ECONOMIC GROWTH* , 1999 .

[14]  R. Husan,et al.  Market Failure, State Failure, Insitutions, and Historical Constraints in the East European Transition , 2002 .

[15]  Klara Sabirianova Peter,et al.  Public Sector Pay and Corruption: Measuring Bribery from Micro Data , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Richard C. Feiock,et al.  Understanding the Adoption and Timing of Economic Development Strategies in US Cities Using Innovation and Institutional Analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Len J. Treviño,et al.  New Institutional Economics and FDI Location in Central and Eastern Europe , 2005 .

[18]  Tony J. G. Verheijen.  Administrative Capacity in the New EU Member States: The Limits of Innovation? , 2007 .

[19]  N. Pain,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment in Central Europe Since 1990: An Econometric Study , 1996, National Institute Economic Review.

[20]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[21]  G. Noutcheva,et al.  The Successful Laggards: Bulgaria and Romania's Accession to the EU , 2008 .

[22]  C. V. Rijckeghem,et al.  Corruption and the Rate of Temptation: Do Low Wages in the Civil Service Cause Corruption? , 1997 .

[23]  Gyorgy Gajduschek.  Politicisation, professionalisation, or both? Hungary's civil service system , 2007 .

[24]  Daniel Kaufmann,et al.  Privatization and Corruption in Transition Economies , 1997 .

[25]  Phanindra V. Wunnava,et al.  Determinants of foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from EU accession candidates , 2004 .

[26]  Anna Grzymala-Busse.  Rebuilding Leviathan: party competition and state exploitation in post-communist democracies , 2007 .

[27]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries , 1999 .

[28]  Pedro C. Magalhães.  The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe , 1999 .

[29]  John Gerring,et al.  Political Institutions and Corruption: The Role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism , 2004, British Journal of Political Science.

[30]  Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling,et al.  Sustainability of Civil Service Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years After EU Accession , 2009 .

[31]  Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling.  Civil service reform in post-communist Europe: the bumpy road to depoliticisation , 2004 .

[32]  T. Haughton.  When does the EU Make a Difference? Conditionality and the Accession Process in Central and Eastern Europe , 2007 .

[33]  James H. Anderson,et al.  Anticorruption in Transition 3: Who is Succeeding... And Why? , 2006 .

[34]  Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling.  The rise of the partisan state? Parties, patronage and the ministerial bureaucracy in Hungary , 2006 .