Towards adaptable interaction analysis tools in CSCL

Interaction analysis has become a basic function in the field of collaborative learning as a means for supporting evaluation processes. These processes can benefit from the use of automatic or semi -automatic interaction analysis tools . If these tools considered the different roles implied in the analysis processes, this could permit to exploit the results of the analysis in function of who is the user and what is his/her purpose. The experience of awareness systems in CSCW that use roles to decide the type and amount of information that they show suggest that this can be an appropriate approach. However, a review of the concept and classification of roles in the CSCL literature has shown a great diversity of classifications and a lack of common vocabulary to describe roles that also ignore the dynamic aspects of real situations. These aspects demand a new dimension for the classification of roles capturing dynamic aspects, such as the evolution of roles in an activity. Moreover, they demand a common vocabulary for defining and describing roles in learning scenarios. This would allow to automatically adapt the functionalities of interaction analysis tool to the evolving needs of the roles. This paper elaborates two proposals that help to detect the changes of roles produced during the collaborative activity and identify the needs established for these roles.

[1]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[2]  Pichai Tongdeelert,et al.  A Proposed Collaborative Computer Network-Based Learning Model for Undergraduate Students with Different Learning Styles , 2003 .

[3]  Beau Jones Designing Learning and Technology for Educational Reform. , 1994 .

[4]  Weiqin Chen Supporting teachers' intervention in collaborative knowledge building , 2006, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[5]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Proceedings of 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2004 , 2004 .

[6]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Rex E. Wallace,et al.  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 , 2001 .

[8]  Marian G. Williams,et al.  A framework for role-based specification and evaluation of awareness support in synchronous collaborative applications , 2002, Proceedings. Eleventh IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[9]  Jacqueline Bourdeau,et al.  Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome Common AI-ED Problems , 2000 .

[10]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Improving science education : the contribution of research , 2000 .

[11]  Moira Lee Collaborative Learning in Three British Adult Education Schemes , 2000 .

[12]  Brigitte Denis,et al.  Roles and Competencies of the e-Tutor , 2004 .

[13]  Annette Gough,et al.  Improving science education : the contribution of research , 2003 .

[14]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  Policies and roles in collaborative applications , 1996, CSCW '96.

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[16]  W. Jochems,et al.  FUNCTIONAL VERSUS SPONTANEOUS ROLES DURING COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING , 2004 .

[17]  José Antonio Marcos,et al.  The role of roles in the analysis of interactions in collaborative environments , 2004 .