Trademarks Statistics as Innovation Indicator? - A Micro Study

This study explores the possibility of using trademark statistics as an indicator of new-to-the-firm innovation. It compares registrations of trademarks and the launch of new-to-the-firm products for a number of Swedish companies in the electromechanical, automotive and pharmaceutical industries. The results show considerable differences between these sectors. For the studied companies in the electromechanical and automotive industries, trademarks are generally unreliable as an indicator of new products. However, the results from the pharmaceutical industry are different. A comparison between trademarks and the number of new products show that a high and fairly stable percentage of the new products have been trademarked. The number of trademarks is also mutually co-integrated with the number of registered (approved) new drugs over the time period 1935-1996. Short term variations are not correlated, possibly due to the extreme uncertainty of the development process in the pharmaceutical industry, where many projects fail even in the final testing, as well as the often lengthy registration process. A comparison between the number of trademarks and patents nevertheless suggests that the trademark statistics carries information about product development activities prior to registration. The study also suggests that the use of trademarks as an indicator of new-to-the-firm innovation is likely to be most successful in industries with frequent use of trademarks and with products targeting consumers or professional end-users, but with less uncertain development process than the pharmaceutical industry’s.

[1]  L. M. Ericsson,et al.  The Ericsson Chronicle: 125 Years in Telecommunications , 2000 .

[2]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[3]  F. Melin Varumärket som strategiskt konkurrensmedel - Om konsten att bygga upp starka varumärken , 1997 .

[4]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: towards a history‐friendly model , 2002 .

[5]  Thomas C. Melvin,et al.  European Patent Office , 2002 .

[6]  L. Mainwaring,et al.  TRADEMARK HOLDINGS OF PRODUCTION FIRMS IN BRITAIN AND IRELAND , 2005 .

[7]  M. Olarreaga,et al.  Trademark Protection or Protectionism? , 2004 .

[8]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  The propensity to patent , 1983 .

[9]  C. Fink,et al.  The Global Distribution of Trademarks: Some Stylised Facts , 2004 .

[10]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Persuasion or Information? Promotion and the Shares of Brand Name and Generic Pharmaceuticals , 1988, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[11]  Per Aspera ad Astra , 1961 .

[12]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[13]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Service marks as novel innovation indicator , 2003 .

[14]  Lennart Schön,et al.  En modern svensk ekonomisk historia : tillväxt och omvandling under två sekel , 2000 .

[15]  Kenneth L. Judd,et al.  On the Performance of Patents , 1985 .

[16]  Monson H. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling , 1996 .

[17]  R. Ramanathan,et al.  Introductory Econometrics With Applications , 1989 .

[18]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[19]  Sandro Mendonça,et al.  Trademarks as an Indicator of Innovation and Industrial Change , 2004 .

[20]  The Rise of Trade Marking in Australia in the 1990s , 2003 .

[21]  N. Economides THE ECONOMICS OF TRADEMARKS , 2003 .