Partially saturated fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences in multiple sclerosis: comparison with fully relaxed FLAIR and conventional spin-echo.

Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences produce selective cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suppression by employing a very long inversion time (TI). We used the FLAIR sequence to study patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) at 0.6 T. So far, a very long TR (and long acquisition time) has been used in a fully relaxed (FR-FLAIR) system. To speed up the FLAIR sequences, we used a shorter TR, and demonstrated that complete CSF suppression can be maintained with partial saturation (PS-FLAIR) by reducing TI at the same time. The introduction of partial saturation, however, reduced the contrast between lesions and normal appearing white matter (NAWM). Suboptimal CSF suppression therefore had to be accepted to maintain sufficient lesion to NAWM contrast. Using a TE of 60 ms, the PS-FLAIR and FR-FLAIR performed equally well in the detection of MS-lesions, although the former provided poorer CSF suppression. Both FLAIR sequences, however, provided poorer constrast between lesions and NAWM compared to conventional spin-echo sequences. Although the long acquisition time of the FLAIR sequence can be reduced by using partial saturation, complete CSF suppression and good lesion to NAWM contrast are incompatible at short TRs. Using a TE of 60 ms, conventional spin-echo sequences detect more lesions and provide better contrast between lesions and NAWM than FLAIR sequences in MS patients.

[1]  D. N. Landon,et al.  Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: characterisation of experimental cerebral oedema. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  R W Parkey,et al.  Fast short-tau inversion-recovery MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[3]  D. Li,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A prospective 2‐year follow‐up with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT , 1991, Neurology.

[4]  Joseph V. Hajnal,et al.  Use of Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) Pulse Sequences in MRI of the Brain , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  G. Barker,et al.  Detection of multiple sclerosis by magnetic resonance imaging , 1994, The Lancet.

[6]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Multiple field strength in vivo T1 and T2 for cerebrospinal fluid protons , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  B E Kendall,et al.  Serial gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  J. Hajnal,et al.  Use of Fluid‐Attenuated Inversion‐Recovery Pulse Sequences for Imaging the Spinal Cord , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  G. Scialfa,et al.  Magnetic resonance in multiple sclerosis , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[10]  R. Lufkin,et al.  MR imaging of experimental demyelination. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  D. N. Landon,et al.  The characterization of experimental gliosis by quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.