Time Course of Induced Astigmatism After Canaloplasty

Purpose:To study the changes in astigmatism after canaloplasty and to analyze its correlation with long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) results. Methods:Twenty-six eyes of 26 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (n=14) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (n=12) undergoing canaloplasty were included in this retrospective study. Canaloplasty comprised of 360-degree catheterisation of Schlemm canal by means of a flexible microcatheter with distension of the canal by 2 tensioning 10-0 polypropylene sutures. Primary outcome measures included IOP, glaucoma medication usage, astigmatism, and adverse events at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Results:The mean preoperative IOP was 21.1±5.8 mm Hg. The mean IOP decreased to 14.25 ±4.3 mm Hg at 6 months. Mean astigmatism preoperatively was 0.77±0.5 D, which increased to 3.3±1.7 D at 2 weeks postoperatively (P⩽0.05; Wilcoxon-test). Thereafter, the astigmatism underwent a spontaneous decline, reaching 1.9±0.8 D at 4 weeks and 1.2±0.74 D at 12 weeks postoperatively. Best-corrected visual acuity did not change significantly. Six months after canaloplasty, mean astigmatism reached the preoperative range of 0.86±0.52 D. Astigmatism at 2 weeks correlated significantly and inversely with IOP at 6 months (r=0.59, P=0.005; Spearman). Conclusions:The change of astigmatism after canaloplasty follows a clear time course with a maximum at 2 weeks reaching preoperative values at 6 months. The amount of surgically induced astigmatism might be helpful to predict outcome of canaloplasty in terms of IOP reduction.

[1]  G. Schlunck,et al.  Are There Filtering Blebs After Canaloplasty? , 2012, Journal of glaucoma.

[2]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Comparison of surgical outcomes between canaloplasty and trabeculectomy at 12 months' follow-up. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[3]  N. Yenerel,et al.  Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome , 2011, Cornea.

[4]  M. Tetz,et al.  Three-year canaloplasty outcomes for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: European study results , 2011, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[5]  R. Stegmann,et al.  Canaloplasty for primary open-angle glaucoma: long-term outcome , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[6]  M. Tsilimbaris,et al.  Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in pseudoexfoliation syndrome , 2010, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[7]  M. Tetz,et al.  Circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal (canaloplasty) with temporal clear corneal phacoemulsification cataract surgery for open‐angle glaucoma and visually significant cataract: One‐year results , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  S. Law,et al.  Effects of combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C on ocular dimensions , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[9]  S. Eğrilmez,et al.  Surgically induced corneal refractive change following glaucoma surgery: Nonpenetrating trabecular surgeries versus trabeculectomy , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  A. Spierer,et al.  Changes in astigmatism after congenital cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation using scleral tunnel incision , 2002, Eye.

[11]  L. Thibos,et al.  Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  S. Vernon,et al.  Topographic and keratometric astigmatism up to 1 year following small flap trabeculectomy (microtrabeculectomy) , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  H. Chung,et al.  The effect of mitomycin-C on postoperative corneal astigmatism in trabeculectomy and a triple procedure. , 1998, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.