Leveraging 35 years of Pinus taeda research in the southeastern US to constrain forest carbon cycle predictions: regional data assimilation using ecosystem experiments

Abstract. Predicting how forest carbon cycling will change in response to climate change and management depends on the collective knowledge from measurements across environmental gradients, ecosystem manipulations of global change factors, and mathematical models. Formally integrating these sources of knowledge through data assimilation, or model–data fusion, allows the use of past observations to constrain model parameters and estimate prediction uncertainty. Data assimilation (DA) focused on the regional scale has the opportunity to integrate data from both environmental gradients and experimental studies to constrain model parameters. Here, we introduce a hierarchical Bayesian DA approach (Data Assimilation to Predict Productivity for Ecosystems and Regions, DAPPER) that uses observations of carbon stocks, carbon fluxes, water fluxes, and vegetation dynamics from loblolly pine plantation ecosystems across the southeastern US to constrain parameters in a modified version of the Physiological Principles Predicting Growth (3-PG) forest growth model. The observations included major experiments that manipulated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, water, and nutrients, along with nonexperimental surveys that spanned environmental gradients across an 8.6  ×  105 km2 region. We optimized regionally representative posterior distributions for model parameters, which dependably predicted data from plots withheld from the data assimilation. While the mean bias in predictions of nutrient fertilization experiments, irrigation experiments, and CO2 enrichment experiments was low, future work needs to focus modifications to model structures that decrease the bias in predictions of drought experiments. Predictions of how growth responded to elevated CO2 strongly depended on whether ecosystem experiments were assimilated and whether the assimilated field plots in the CO2 study were allowed to have different mortality parameters than the other field plots in the region. We present predictions of stem biomass productivity under elevated CO2, decreased precipitation, and increased nutrient availability that include estimates of uncertainty for the southeastern US. Overall, we (1) demonstrated how three decades of research in southeastern US planted pine forests can be used to develop DA techniques that use multiple locations, multiple data streams, and multiple ecosystem experiment types to optimize parameters and (2) developed a tool for the development of future predictions of forest productivity for natural resource managers that leverage a rich dataset of integrated ecosystem observations across a region.

[1]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Dynamic Site Model for Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) Plantations in the United States , 2006, Forest Science.

[2]  R. Will,et al.  Fixed physiological parameters in the 3-PG model produced accurate estimates of loblolly pine growth on sites in different geographic regions , 2013 .

[3]  B. Law,et al.  An improved analysis of forest carbon dynamics using data assimilation , 2005 .

[4]  H. Lee Allen,et al.  The Development of Pine Plantation Silviculture in the Southern United States , 2007 .

[5]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Tamm Review: Light use efficiency and carbon storage in nutrient and water experiments on major forest plantation species , 2016 .

[6]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Use of a spatial process-based model to quantify forest plantation productivity and water use efficiency under climate change scenarios , 2009 .

[7]  R. Oren,et al.  INTRA- AND INTER-ANNUAL VARIATION IN TRANSPIRATION OF A PINE FOREST , 2001 .

[8]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  The model–data fusion pitfall: assuming certainty in an uncertain world , 2011, Oecologia.

[9]  Ge Sun,et al.  Response of carbon fluxes to drought in a coastal plain loblolly pine forest , 2010 .

[10]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2018 , 2014, Earth System Science Data.

[11]  R. Teskey,et al.  Fertilization increases sensitivity of canopy stomatal conductance and transpiration to throughfall reduction in an 8-year-old loblolly pine plantation , 2015 .

[12]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Growth Responses of Loblolly Pine in the Southeast United States to Midrotation Applications of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Micronutrients , 2014 .

[13]  S. Linder,et al.  Mean canopy stomatal conductance responses to water and nutrient availabilities in Picea abies and Pinus taeda. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[14]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Leaf area duration in natural range and exotic Pinus taeda , 2010 .

[15]  James S. Clark,et al.  The effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization on stomatal conductance estimated from 11 years of scaled sap flux measurements at Duke FACE. , 2013, Tree physiology.

[16]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[17]  Charles O. Sabatia,et al.  Predicting site index of plantation loblolly pine from biophysical variables , 2014 .

[18]  R. Wynne,et al.  Determination of Fertility Rating (FR) in the 3-PG Model for Loblolly Pine Plantations in the Southeastern United States Based on Site Index , 2015 .

[19]  Rob Kooper,et al.  On improving the communication between models and data. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[20]  Li Zhang,et al.  Parameter identifiability, constraint, and equifinality in data assimilation with ecosystem models. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[21]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Local and general above-stump biomass functions for loblolly pine and slash pine trees , 2014 .

[22]  A. Oishi,et al.  On the difference in the net ecosystem exchange of CO2 between deciduous and evergreen forests in the southeastern United States , 2015, Global change biology.

[23]  A. Anthony Bloom,et al.  Constraining ecosystem carbon dynamics in a data-limited world: integrating ecological "common sense" in a model-data fusion framework , 2014 .

[24]  J. Gove,et al.  The REFLEX project: Comparing different algorithms and implementations for the inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model against eddy covariance data , 2009 .

[25]  W. Cropper,et al.  Parameterization of the 3-PG model for Pinus elliottii stands using alternative methods to estimate fertility rating, biomass partitioning and canopy closure , 2014 .

[26]  Charles W. Cook,et al.  Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO(2) enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO(2)] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[27]  Madison K. Akers,et al.  A Range-Wide Experiment to Investigate Nutrient and Soil Moisture Interactions in Loblolly Pine Plantations , 2015 .

[28]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Land carbon sequestration within the conterminous United States: Regional‐ and state‐level analyses , 2015 .

[29]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models , 2015 .

[30]  T. J. Mullin,et al.  Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the south , 2003 .

[31]  E. Davidson,et al.  Estimating parameters of a forest ecosystem C model with measurements of stocks and fluxes as joint constraints , 2010, Oecologia.

[32]  T. Martin,et al.  Water availability and genetic effects on water relations of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands. , 2010, Tree physiology.

[33]  K. Davis,et al.  A Bayesian calibration of a simple carbon cycle model: The role of observations in estimating and reducing uncertainty , 2008 .

[34]  A. Noormets,et al.  Fertilization intensifies drought stress: Water use and stomatal conductance of Pinus taeda in a midrotation fertilization and throughfall reduction experiment , 2015 .

[35]  B. Strahm,et al.  Differences in the recovery of four different nitrogen containing fertilizers after two application seasons in pine plantations across the southeastern United States , 2016 .

[36]  Natasha MacBean,et al.  Consistent assimilation of multiple data streams in a carbon cycle data assimilation system , 2016 .

[37]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Juvenile Southern Pine Response to Fertilization Is Influenced by Soil Drainage and Texture , 2015 .

[38]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  OptIC project: An intercomparison of optimization techniques for parameter estimation in terrestrial biogeochemical models , 2007 .

[39]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Root and stem partitioning of Pinus taeda , 2006, Trees.

[40]  J. Abatzoglou Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling , 2013 .

[41]  Marko Scholze,et al.  On the capability of Monte Carlo and adjoint inversion techniques to derive posterior parameter uncertainties in terrestrial ecosystem models , 2012 .

[42]  J. O H N,et al.  Forest carbon use efficiency : is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production ? , 2007 .

[43]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  The role of data assimilation in predictive ecology , 2014 .

[44]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Long term growth responses of loblolly pine to optimal nutrient and water resource availability , 2004 .

[45]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Yield Relationships in Unthinned Loblolly Pine Plantations on Cutover, Site-Prepared Lands , 1985 .

[46]  Mevin B. Hooten,et al.  Bayesian Models: A Statistical Primer for Ecologists , 2015 .

[47]  Shenfeng Fei,et al.  Ecological forecasting and data assimilation in a data-rich era. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[48]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[49]  G. Katul,et al.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere , 2001, Nature.

[50]  A. Lindroth,et al.  Energy partitioning in relation to leaf area development of short-rotation willow coppice , 1996 .

[51]  E. Davidson,et al.  Using model‐data fusion to interpret past trends, and quantify uncertainties in future projections, of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling , 2012 .

[52]  Julie D. Jastrow,et al.  Impacts of Fine Root Turnover on Forest NPP and Soil C Sequestration Potential , 2003, Science.

[53]  A. Noormets,et al.  Regional validation and improved parameterization of the 3-PG model for Pinus taeda stands , 2016 .

[54]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Relative information contributions of model vs. data to short- and long-term forecasts of forest carbon dynamics. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[55]  L. Samuelson,et al.  Growth and physiology of loblolly pine in response to long-term resource management: defining growth potential in the southern United States , 2008 .

[56]  J. P. Barnett,et al.  Interactive effects of fertilization and throughfall exclusion on the physiological responses and whole-tree carbon uptake of mature loblolly pine , 2004 .

[57]  A. Desai,et al.  A primer for data assimilation with ecological models using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) , 2011, Oecologia.

[58]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2015 , 2015 .

[59]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Monthly leaf area index estimates from point-in-time measurements and needle phenology for Pinus taeda , 2003 .