Shear strength behaviour and the measurement of shear strength in residual soils

The selection of appropriate strength parameters and the prediction of deformation and failure are important steps in the design of foundations and cut slopes in residual soils. In countries with widespread residual soils, strength testing practice, both in the laboratory and in the field mostly follows standard procedures, employing triaxial and shear box tests in the laboratory and some form of penetration test, vane or plate loading test in the field (Brand & Phillipson, 1985). The need for a clear understanding of the difference between transported and residual soils arises mainly with the preparation and handling of the specimens, and with the interpretation of the test results. A knowledge of the genesis of residual soils and of the factors affecting their shear strength will enable both engineers engaged in design and in material testing to appreciate the peculiarities of these materials in their response to deformation and shear, and will thus facilitate the selection of the most suitable design values for their work. Residual soils develop a particular fabric, grain structure and particle size distribution in situ, which may make them fundamentally different from transported soils. The latter develop their fabric as a result of their mode of deposition and their stress history after deposition. In the following section, the special features which affect the stress-strain behaviour and the strength of residual soils will be summarized and discussed.

[1]  A. Casacrande,et al.  Effect of Rate of Loading on the Strength of Clays and Shales at Constant Water Content , 1951 .

[2]  V. Garga Effect of sample size on shear strength of basaltic residual soils , 1988 .

[3]  M. A. Stroud,et al.  The standard penetration test in insensitive clays and soft rocks , 1975 .

[4]  Serotas,et al.  SPT PRACTICE MEETS CRITICAL REVIEW , 1973 .

[5]  R. E. Gibson,et al.  Influence of Duration of tests at Constant Rate of Strain on Measured “Drained” Strength , 1954 .

[6]  G. E. Blight Residual Soils in South Africa , 1982 .

[7]  Walter Tollmien,et al.  Über die Eindringungsfestigkeit (Härte) plastischer Baustoffe und die Festigkeit von Schneiden , 1961 .

[8]  A. M. Richardson,et al.  In-Situ Determination of Anisotropy of a Soft Clay , 1975 .

[9]  K. Y. Lo The Operational Strength of Fissured Clays , 1970 .

[10]  E. W. Brand Some aspects of field measurements for slopes in residual soils : Proc 2nd International Symposium on Field Measurements in Geomechanics, Kobe, 6–9 April 1987 V1, P531–547. Publ Rotterdam: A A Balkema, 1988 , 1990 .

[11]  P. I. Lewin,et al.  UNDISTURBED SAMPLES OF LONDON CLAY FROM THE ASHFORD COMMON SHAFT' STRENGTH-EFFECTIVE STRESS RELATIONSHIPS , 1965 .

[12]  R. P. Brenner,et al.  Soft clay engineering , 1981 .

[13]  T. C. Johnson,et al.  Use of Back Pressure to Increase Degree of Saturation of Triaxial Test Specimens , 1960 .

[14]  N. Khalili,et al.  A unique relationship for χ for the determination of the shear strength of unsaturated soils , 1998 .

[15]  W. H. Ward,et al.  Properties of the London Clay at the Ashford Common Shaft: in-Situ and Undrained Strength Tests* , 1965 .

[16]  David K. Black,et al.  Saturating Laboratory Samples by Back Pressure , 1973 .

[17]  D. Fredlund,et al.  A Multistage Triaxial Test for Unsaturated Soils , 1982 .

[18]  Geoffrey E. Blight,et al.  Foundation Failures of Four Rockfill Slopes , 1969 .

[19]  G. Blight,et al.  A Note on Field Vane Testing of Silty Soils , 1968 .

[20]  A. Andresen,et al.  Exploration, Sampling and In-Situ Testing of Soft Clay , 1981 .

[21]  J. D. Brown,et al.  A New Ring Shear Apparatus and Its Application to the Measurement of Residual Strength , 1971 .

[22]  R. J. Chandler,et al.  THE IN-SITU MEASUREMENT OF THE UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF CLAYS USING THE FIELD VANE , 1988 .

[23]  A. W. Bishop,et al.  A hydraulic triaxial apparatus for controlled stress path testing , 1975 .

[24]  D. Fredlund,et al.  The shear strength of unsaturated soils , 1978 .

[25]  G. E. Blight,et al.  Effective Stress Evaluation for Unsaturated Soils , 1967 .

[26]  A. Bishop,et al.  Some Aspects of Effective Stress in Saturated and Partly Saturated Soils , 1963 .

[27]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  Cone-penetration testing in geotechnical practice , 1997 .

[28]  K. H. Head,et al.  Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing—Volume 2: Permeability, Shear Strength and Compressibility Tests , 2014 .

[29]  G. E. Blight,et al.  Factors Controlling the Strength of Partly Saturated Cohesive Soils , 1960 .

[30]  Dw Hight,et al.  State-of-the-Art Paper: A Reevaluation of Conventional Triaxial Test Methods , 1988 .

[31]  Robert P. Chapuis,et al.  A Study of Undrained Shear Strength Using Various Vanes , 1993 .

[32]  J. Cowland,et al.  Three cut slope failures on relict discontinuities in saprolitic soils , 1988 .

[33]  C. P. Wroth,et al.  The interpretation of in situ soil tests , 1984 .

[34]  D. Fredlund,et al.  Increase in Strength Due to Suction for Two Hong Kong Soils , 1982 .

[35]  A. Bishop,et al.  Measurement of Soil Properties in the Triaxial Test , 1976 .