Hypertension and diabetes mellitus as determinants of multiple lacunar infarcts.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We investigated the relationship between hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and lacunes. METHODS From 1237 cases of ischemic stroke in the Stroke Data Bank of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, data from 637 patients whose initial computed tomogram showed lacunar (n = 184) or nonlacunar infarcts (n = 453) were analyzed. The group with lacunar infarcts was further divided into subgroups according to whether the patients had multiple (n = 40) or single (n = 144) lacunar infarcts. The association of hypertension and diabetes mellitus with lacunar infarcts was investigated using logistic regression models that included age, sex, and cardiac disease. Similar models were used to analyze the effects of diastolic and systolic blood pressure. RESULTS Hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 6.0) and diabetes (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.5) were significantly related to multiple but not to single lacunes. Cardiac disease was inversely associated with both single and multiple lacunes. Diastolic blood pressure significantly affected the probability of multiple lacunar infarcts (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.9), whereas systolic pressure did not. CONCLUSIONS There may be etiologically distinct lacunar infarct subgroups, with multiple lacunes being strongly related to hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Other stroke risk factors may be more important in patients with single lacunes. Diastolic rather than systolic pressure seems to be a major determinant of multiple lacunes.

[1]  J. Lodder,et al.  Two Clinically Distinct Lacunar Infarct Entities?: A Hypothesis , 1993, Stroke.

[2]  J. Lodder,et al.  Incidence, natural history, and risk factors in lacunar infarction. , 1993, Advances in neurology.

[3]  J. Lodder,et al.  Lacunar Infarcts: Pathogenesis and Validity of the Clinical Syndromes , 1991, Stroke.

[4]  K. Dozono,et al.  An autopsy study of the incidence of lacunes in relation to age, hypertension, and arteriosclerosis. , 1991, Stroke.

[5]  Daniel B Hier,et al.  Clinical-computed tomographic correlations of lacunar infarction in the Stroke Data Bank. , 1991, Stroke.

[6]  C. Millikan,et al.  The fallacy of the lacune hypothesis. , 1990, Stroke.

[7]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Are hypertension or cardiac embolism likely causes of lacunar infarction? , 1990, Stroke.

[8]  M. Tuszynski,et al.  Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pathologically verified lacunar infarctions. , 1989, Stroke.

[9]  J. Bogousslavsky,et al.  The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1,000 consecutive patients with first stroke. , 1988, Stroke.

[10]  Daniel B Hier,et al.  The Stroke Data Bank: design, methods, and baseline characteristics. , 1988, Stroke.

[11]  A. Hijdra.  Cerebrovascular disease: Research and clinical management Volume 1, by H. Lechner, J.S. Meyer and E. Ott (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986, US $104.00 , 1987, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[12]  D. Reed,et al.  Diabetes and the risk of stroke. The Honolulu Heart Program. , 1987, JAMA.

[13]  Fisher Cm,et al.  Lacunes: Small, deep cerebral infarcts , 1965 .