Structure and diversity of a natural temperate sessile oak (Quercus petraea L.) – European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest

Abstract The paper details an investigation of the stand structure and patterns of diversity observed in the Runcu-Grosi Natural Reserve (western Romania), one of the best preserved natural mixed sessile oak forests in Europe. The effect of the proportion of sessile oak in the stand composition on specific patterns was also studied. Comparable with other natural forests, the stands of Runcu-Grosi are characterised by a high volume (mean living tree volume of 577 m3 ha−1 in the sessile oak dominated plots and 675 in the pure beech plots), a highly differentiated diameter distribution and a large quantity of dead wood, especially in the mixed plots (approx. 135 m3 ha−1, compared to 75 in the pure beech plots). The higher volume of coarse woody debris in the mixed plots is due to the higher proportion of dead sessile oak in the reserve, which accounted for about 70% of the total dead wood in both the sessile oak and the beech dominated plots. The over proportional representation of dead sessile oak, and a very low number of oak saplings taller than 1.3 m, indicated a declining tendency of sessile oak in the stand in future. The sessile oak dominated stands exhibited a higher level of tree species diversity than those dominated by beech. Where beech was the dominant species, a high percentage of the sessile oak was present in pure groups (36%), whereas in the oak dominated stands, most of the sessile oaks were surrounded either by shade tolerant beech or by other species (ca. 75%), and were classed as either dominant or codominant trees. These species-specific patterns correspond with the silviculture of mixed oak-beech forests: without interventions to favour oak, the dominance of beech will increase.

[1]  F. Sabatini,et al.  Testing indicators of sustainable forest management on understorey composition and diversity in southern Italy through variation partitioning , 2011, Plant Ecology.

[2]  Klaus von Gadow,et al.  An analysis of spatial forest structure using neighbourhood-based variables , 2003 .

[3]  N. Breda,et al.  Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences , 2006 .

[4]  A. Zingg,et al.  Structure of virgin and managed beech forests in Uholka (Ukraine) and Sihlwald (Switzerland): a comparative study , 2005 .

[5]  W. Keeton,et al.  Structural characteristics and aboveground biomass of old‐growth spruce–fir stands in the eastern Carpathian mountains, Ukraine , 2010 .

[6]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: Raised by tree richness or beaten by beech? , 2008 .

[7]  Sessile oak (Quercus petraea Liebl.) site index variations in relation to climate, topography and soil in even-aged high-forest stands in northern France , 2005 .

[8]  J. Heilmann‐Clausen,et al.  The structure of Suserup Skov, a near-natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. , 1996 .

[9]  Jürgen Bauhus,et al.  Silviculture for old-growth attributes , 2009 .

[10]  A. Petritan,et al.  Effects of shade on growth and mortality of maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings , 2007 .

[11]  P. Meyer,et al.  Die Struktur albanischer Rotbuchen-Urwälder – Ableitungen für eine naturnahe Buchenwirtschaft , 2003, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt vereinigt mit Tharandter forstliches Jahrbuch.

[12]  M. Saniga,et al.  Canopy gaps in an old-growth fir-beech forest remnant of Western Carpathians , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[13]  M. Saniga,et al.  Stand structure and temporal variability in old-growth beech-dominated forests of the northwestern Carpathians: A 40-years perspective , 2012 .

[14]  P. Meyer,et al.  When nature takes over from man: Dead wood accumulation in previously managed oak and beech woodlands in North-western and Central Europe , 2009 .

[15]  S. Korpel,et al.  Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten , 1995 .

[16]  F. Thomas,et al.  Abiotic and biotic factors and their interactions as causes of oak decline in Central Europe , 2002 .

[17]  F. Lebourgeois,et al.  Spatial variation and temporal instability in climate-growth relationships of sessile oak (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl.) under temperate conditions , 2011, Plant Ecology.

[18]  J. Gove,et al.  A finite mixture of two Weibull distributions for modeling the diameter distributions of rotated-sigmoid, uneven-aged stands , 2001 .

[19]  G. F. Peterken,et al.  Natural Woodland: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. , 1996 .

[20]  P. Ciais,et al.  Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks , 2008, Nature.

[21]  M. Heimann,et al.  Old-growth forests : function, fate and value , 2009 .

[22]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Diaci,et al.  A dendroecological reconstruction of disturbance in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest in Slovenia , 2007, Annals of Forest Science.

[24]  J. Diaci,et al.  Gap regeneration and replacement patterns in an old-growth Fagus–Abies forest of Bosnia–Herzegovina , 2010, Plant Ecology.

[25]  J. Parviainen,et al.  Research in forest reserves and natural forests in European countries : country reports for the COST Action E4 : Forest Reserves Research Network. , 1999 .

[26]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Analysis and modeling of spatial stand structures. Methodological considerations based on mixed beech-larch stands in Lower Saxony , 1997 .

[27]  D. Hertel,et al.  Drought responses at leaf, stem and fine root levels of competitive Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. trees in dry and wet years , 2001 .

[28]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Conserving Forest Biodiversity: A Comprehensive, Multiscaled Approach , 2002 .

[29]  T. Nagel,et al.  Gap disturbance regime in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest in the Dinaric Mountains, Bosnia-Herzegovina , 2008 .

[30]  A. Petritan,et al.  A comparative analysis of foliar chemical composition and leaf construction costs of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings along a light gradient , 2010, Annals of Forest Science.

[31]  L. Rosati,et al.  Plant species diversity in Mediterranean old-growth forests: A case study from central Italy , 2009 .

[32]  K. Gadow,et al.  Is the reverse J-shaped diameter distribution universally applicable in European virgin beech forests? , 2006 .

[33]  S. Hein,et al.  Effect of species composition, stand density and site index on the basal area increment of oak trees (Quercus sp.) in mixed stands with beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in northern France , 2006 .

[34]  E. Röhrig.  Vegetation structure and forest succession , 1991 .

[35]  Andrzej Bobiec,et al.  Living stands and dead wood in the Białowieża forest: suggestions for restoration management , 2002 .

[36]  U. Bohn,et al.  Interaktive CD-ROM zur Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas / Interactive CD-Rom Map of the Natural Vegetation of Europe , 2004 .

[37]  J. D. Smidt,et al.  Virgin forests in Romania and Bulgaria: results of two national inventory projects and their implications for protection , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[38]  N. Smith,et al.  With contributions from , 2007 .

[39]  D. Frank,et al.  Species-specific climate sensitivity of tree growth in Central-West Germany , 2009, Trees.

[40]  J. Krahl-Urban.  Die Eichen : Forstliche Monographie der Traubeneiche und der Stieleiche , 1959 .