The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation.

Peer review can be performed successfully only if those involved have a clear idea as to its fundamental purpose. Most authors of articles on the subject assume that the purpose of peer review is quality control. This is an inadequate answer. The fundamental purpose of peer review in the biomedical sciences must be consistent with that of medicine itself, to cure sometimes, to relieve often, to comfort always. Peer review must therefore aim to facilitate the introduction into medicine of improved ways of curing, relieving, and comforting patients. The fulfillment of this aim requires both quality control and the encouragement of innovation. If an appropriate balance between the two is lost, then peer review will fail to fulfill its purpose.

[1]  E. Hammel,et al.  Macrodontia in Pleistocene humans from Europe as a feature of physiological acromegalosis: association with geomagnetic dipole field intensity , 1990 .

[2]  D. Horrobin.  The grants game , 1989, Nature.

[3]  Evelleen Richards.  The Politics of Therapeutic Evaluation: The Vitamin C and Cancer Controversy , 1988 .

[4]  Rosalyn S. Yalow.  Peer review and scientific revolutions , 1986, Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  P. Steptoe.  Historical Aspects of the Ethics of in Vitro Fertilization , 1985, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  H. Hillman.  The anatomical synapse in mammals by light and electron microscopy. , 1985, Medical hypotheses.

[7]  K. Setaelae.  Carcinogenesis--devolution towards an ancient nucleated pre-eukaryotic level. , 1984, Medical hypotheses.

[8]  F. Johnson.  The History of Lithium Therapy , 1984, Palgrave Macmillan UK.

[9]  Robert Ladenson,et al.  Betrayers of the Truth , 1982 .

[10]  E. Schlesinger,et al.  Chase, chance, and creativity , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  G. Reid.  The pharmacological role of zinc: evidence from clinical studies on animals. , 1981, Medical hypotheses.

[12]  R. Yalow.  Presidential address: reflections of a non-establishmentarian. , 1980, Endocrinology.

[13]  H. Wyatt.  Is poliomyelitis a genetically-determined disease? II. A critical examination of the epidemiological data. , 1975, Medical hypotheses.

[14]  D F Horrobin,et al.  Referees and research administrators: barriers to scientific research? , 1974, British medical journal.

[15]  H. Krebs.  The History of the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[16]  G. Ling,et al.  Studies on ion distribution in living cells. II. Cooperative interaction between intracellular potassium and sodium ions. , 1970, Biophysical journal.

[17]  B. Glick,et al.  The Bursa of Fabricius and Antibody Production , 1956 .

[18]  J. Cade.  Lithium salts in the treatment of psychotic excitement. , 1949, The Medical journal of Australia.

[19]  P. Rous,et al.  A TRANSMISSIBLE AVIAN NEOPLASM. (SARCOMA OF THE COMMON FOWL.) , 1910, The Journal of experimental medicine.