Relative meaning frequencies for 578 homonyms in two Spanish dialects: A cross-linguistic extension of the English eDom norms

[1]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Itamar Lerner,et al.  What can we learn from learning models about sensitivity to letter-order in visual word recognition? , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[3]  Blair C. Armstrong,et al.  The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Natasha Tokowicz,et al.  Cross-language influences: translation status affects intraword sense relatedness , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[5]  A. Duchon,et al.  EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[6]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Not all ambiguous words are created equal: An EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy , 2012, Brain and Language.

[7]  Ram Frost,et al.  A universal approach to modeling visual word recognition and reading: Not only possible, but also inevitable , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Blair C Armstrong,et al.  eDom: Norming software and relative meaning frequencies for 544 English homonyms , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[9]  Blair C Armstrong,et al.  SOS! An algorithm and software for the stochastic optimization of stimuli , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[10]  K. Rastle,et al.  The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[11]  T. Gollan,et al.  Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish–English bilinguals* , 2011, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[12]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Inducing homonymy effects via stimulus quality and (not) nonword difficulty: Implications for models of semantic ambiguity and word recognition , 2011, CogSci.

[13]  L. Carlson,et al.  Expanding the Space of Cognitive Science , 2011 .

[14]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  The relatedness-of-meaning effect for ambiguous words in lexical-decision tasks: when does relatedness matter? , 2010, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[15]  Natasha Tokowicz,et al.  Semantic Ambiguity within and across Languages: An Integrative Review , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  Effect of Representational Distance Between Meanings on Recognition of Ambiguous Spoken Words , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Isabel Gómez-Veiga,et al.  Estudio normativo de ambigedad lxica en castellano, en nios y en adultos , 2010 .

[18]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[19]  D. Titone,et al.  Making sense of word senses: the comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  D. Share.  On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an "outlier" orthography. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  K. Gwet.  Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. , 2008, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[22]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Settling dynamics in distributed networks explain task differences in semantic ambiguity effects: Computational and behavioral evidence , 2008 .

[23]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[24]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding? , 2006 .

[25]  David Poeppel,et al.  The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Victor Smetacek,et al.  Making sense , 2004, Nature.

[27]  Steven E. Stemler.  Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation A Comparison of Consensus, Consistency, and Measurement A Comparison of Consensus, Consistency, and Measurement Approaches to Estimating Interrater Reliability Approaches to Estimating Interrater Reliabilit , 2022 .

[28]  G. Murphy,et al.  Paper has been my ruin: Conceptual relations of polysemous senses , 2002 .

[29]  Ekaterini Klepousniotou.  The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity: Homonymy and Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon , 2002, Brain and Language.

[30]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical Access , 2002 .

[31]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Representation of Polysemous Words , 2001 .

[32]  S. Joordens,et al.  Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Why SAFE Is Better Than FAST: The Relatedness of a Word's Meanings Affects Lexical Decision Times , 1997 .

[34]  P. Dixon,et al.  University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[35]  José J. Cañas,et al.  Asociados de una base de homógrafos , 1993 .

[36]  Adelina Estévez Monzó.  Estudio normativo sobre ambigüedad en castellano , 1991 .

[37]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆ , 1990 .

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[39]  P. Tabossi.  Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts , 1988 .

[40]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[42]  J. A. Bolúfer,et al.  Diccionario de la lengua española , 1917 .