The spillover effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' free knowledge contribution behavior

PurposeUnderstanding health experts' online free knowledge contribution behavior is vital for promoting health knowledge and improving health literacy. This study focuses on the spillover effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' free knowledge contribution behavior.Design/methodology/approachIn 2016, Zhihu Live and Zhi Hu were launched as two types of paid knowledge products on Zhihu.com, a hybrid knowledge exchange platform. Focusing on the policy impact of launching Zhihu Live and Zhi Hu, this study uses the difference-in-differences model to analyze the heterogeneous spillover effects of high-yield and low-yield monetary incentives on health experts' free knowledge contribution behavior.FindingsIn the short term, the high-yield monetary incentive has positive spillover effects on the quantity and quality of free knowledge contribution while the low-yield monetary incentive generates opposite effects. In the long term, the effects of the high-yield monetary incentive remain significantly positive. The effect of the low-yield monetary incentive on the quantity of free knowledge contribution remains significantly negative, but its effect on the quality of free knowledge contribution is not significant.Originality/valueThis study combines theories of reciprocity and resource limitation to study the spillover effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' online behavior. The short-term and long-term effects of different monetary incentive levels on health experts' online behavior are also explored.

[1]  Jying-Nan Wang,et al.  Understanding a Nonlinear Causal Relationship Between Rewards and Physicians’ Contributions in Online Health Care Communities: Longitudinal Study , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  Hailiang Chen,et al.  Monetary Incentive and Stock Opinions on Social Media , 2019, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Contributing high quantity and quality knowledge to online Q&A communities , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Nicole Novielli,et al.  Mining Successful Answers in Stack Overflow , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories.

[5]  Yong Tan,et al.  Leveraging Philanthropic Behavior for Customer Support: The Case of User Support Forums , 2014, MIS Q..

[6]  Jing Sun,et al.  Dynamic Optimal Pricing Strategies for Knowledge-Sharing Platforms , 2018, PACIS.

[7]  L. Feick,et al.  A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood , 2007 .

[8]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Status Spillovers: The Effect of Status-conferring Prizes on the Allocation of Attention , 2018 .

[9]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  Knowledge Market Design: A Field Experiment at Google Answers , 2010 .

[10]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Motivations in Open Source Software Communities: The Mediating Role of Effort Intensity and Goal Commitment , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[11]  Jin Zhang,et al.  From free to paid: Customer expertise and customer satisfaction on knowledge payment platforms , 2019, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Doctor–patient relationship strength’s impact in an online healthcare community , 2018, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[13]  Bin Gu,et al.  Content Contribution for Revenue Sharing and Reputation in Social Media: A Dynamic Structural Model , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Gang Wang,et al.  Pay-per-Question: Towards Targeted Q&A with Payments , 2018, GROUP.

[15]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[16]  Nikolaos Korfiatis,et al.  You scratch someone's back and we'll scratch yours: Collective reciprocity in social Q&A communities , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Soojung Kim,et al.  Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site , 2009 .

[18]  Bin Gu,et al.  Measuring and Managing the Externality of Managerial Responses to Online Customer Reviews , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Sanghee Oh,et al.  Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Xiaohua Zeng,et al.  Platform Competition in the Sharing Economy: Understanding How Ride-Hailing Services Influence New Car Purchases , 2019, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Adam Worrall,et al.  Quality evaluation of health answers in Yahoo! Answers: A comparison between experts and users , 2011, ASIST.

[22]  B. Frey,et al.  The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out , 1997 .

[23]  R. Chandy,et al.  Managing the Future: CEO Attention and Innovation Outcomes , 2007 .

[24]  Yili Hong,et al.  Stimulating Online Reviews by Combining Financial Incentives and Social Norms , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Fu-Ren Lin,et al.  Why people share knowledge in virtual communities?: The use of Yahoo! Kimo Knowledge+ as an example , 2013, Internet Res..

[26]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  Quality in Product Reviews: What Technical Communicators Should Know , 2015 .

[27]  Tobias Regner,et al.  Social preferences? Google Answers! , 2014, Games Econ. Behav..

[28]  Seth A. Kaplan,et al.  If you feel bad, it's unfair: a quantitative synthesis of affect and organizational justice perceptions. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Xin Fu,et al.  Paying for Knowledge: Why People Paying for Live Broadcasts in Online Knowledge Sharing Community? , 2018, PACIS.

[30]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Exploring Characteristics and Effects of User Participation in Online Social Q&A Sites , 2008, First Monday.

[31]  J. Tirole,et al.  Incentives and Prosocial Behavior , 2005 .

[32]  Anja Iseke,et al.  Explicit Incentives in Online Communities: Boon or Bane? , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[33]  J. Tirole,et al.  Incentives and Prosocial Behavior , 2004 .

[34]  Yili Hong,et al.  Spillover Effects of Financial Incentives on Non-Incentivized User Engagement: Evidence from an Online Knowledge Exchange Platform , 2018, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Liangfei Qiu,et al.  Effect of “Following” on Contributions to Open Source Communities , 2018, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All , 2000 .

[37]  Hailiang Chen,et al.  Monetary Incentive and Stock Opinions on Social Media , 2019, Journal of Management Information Systems.

[38]  Daphne R. Raban,et al.  The Incentive Structure in an Online Information Market , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Le Wang,et al.  Knowledge contribution behavior in online Q&A communities: An empirical investigation , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[41]  Bin Fang,et al.  What drives the sales of paid knowledge products? A two-phase approach , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Xiao Ma,et al.  Understanding Members’ Active Participation in Online Question-and-Answer Communities: A Theory and Empirical Analysis , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Chengzhi Zhang,et al.  Researchers' judgment criteria of high-quality answers on academic social Q&A platforms , 2020, Online Inf. Rev..

[44]  C. Liddy,et al.  Impact of Question Content on e-Consultation Outcomes. , 2016, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[45]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[46]  D. Ariely,et al.  Effort for Payment , 2004, Psychological science.

[47]  Spyros Angelopoulos,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Monetary Incentives on User Behavior in Online Sharing Platforms , 2018, HICSS.

[48]  Gilad Mishne,et al.  Finding high-quality content in social media , 2008, WSDM '08.

[49]  Bei Yan,et al.  Beyond reciprocity: The bystander effect of knowledge response in online knowledge communities , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Tsung-Hsien Kuo,et al.  How system quality and incentive affect knowledge sharing , 2013, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[52]  Chunfang Zhou.  A Study on Creative Climate in Project-Organized Groups (POGs) in China and Implications for Sustainable Pedagogy , 2018 .

[53]  Raj Chetty,et al.  What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics , 2014 .

[54]  Sofia M. Lourenço.  Monetary Incentives, Feedback, and Recognition—Complements or Substitutes? Evidence from a Field Experiment in a Retail Services Company , 2016 .

[55]  Minhyung Kang,et al.  Active users' knowledge-sharing continuance on social Q&A sites: motivators and hygiene factors , 2018, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[56]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  User adoption of physician's replies in an online health community: An empirical study , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[57]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation crowding theory , 2001 .

[58]  Zhaohua Deng,et al.  Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities: A comparative study of health professionals and normal users , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  How Doctors Gain Social and Economic Returns in Online Health-Care Communities: A Professional Capital Perspective , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Why pay?: exploring how financial incentives are used for question & answer , 2010, CHI.

[61]  Hangzhou Yang,et al.  Toward Sustainable Virtualized Healthcare: Extracting Medical Entities from Chinese Online Health Consultations Using Deep Neural Networks , 2018, Sustainability.

[62]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Yan Chen,et al.  Re-examining price as a predictor of answer quality in an online q&a site , 2010, CHI.

[64]  D. DeSteno,et al.  Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior , 2006, Psychological science.

[65]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something , 2008, WWW.

[66]  Oriana Bandiera,et al.  No Margin, no Mission? A Field Experiment on Incentives for public service delivery , 2014 .

[67]  Yue Jin,et al.  What Influences Content Popularity? An Empirical Investigation of Voting in Social Q&A Communities , 2017, PACIS.

[68]  B. Frey.  Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation , 1998 .

[69]  Chirag Shah,et al.  User motivations for asking questions in online Q&A services , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..