Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal

A plant lineage can compete for resources in a spatially variable environment by colonizing new areas, exploiting resources in those areas quickly before other plants arrive to compete with it, or tolerating competition once other plants do arrive. These specializations are ubiquitous in plant communities, but all three have never been derived from a spatial model of community dynamics—instead, the possibility of rapid exploitation has been either overlooked or confounded with colonization. We use moment equations, equations for the mean densities and spatial covariance of competing plant populations, to characterize these strategies in a fully spatial stochastic model. The moment equations predict endogenous spatial pattern formation and the efficacy of spatial strategies under different conditions. The model shows that specializations for colonization, exploitation, and tolerance are all possible, and these are the only possible spatial strategies; among them, they partition all of the endogenous spatial structure in the environment. The model predicts two distinct short‐dispersal specializations where parents disperse their offspring locally, either to exploit empty patches quickly or to fill patches to exclude competitors.

[1]  S. Pacala,et al.  Models Suggesting Field Experiments to Test Two Hypotheses Explaining Successional Diversity , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[2]  S. Orszag,et al.  "Critical slowing down" in time-to-extinction: an example of critical phenomena in ecology. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  H. B. Wilson,et al.  Running from Trouble: Long‐Distance Dispersal and the Competitive Coexistence of Inferior Species , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[4]  R. Durrett,et al.  Spatial aspects of interspecific competition. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[6]  B. Bolker,et al.  Using Moment Equations to Understand Stochastically Driven Spatial Pattern Formation in Ecological Systems , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species , 1997 .

[8]  D. Tilman,et al.  Competition in spatial habitats , 1997 .

[9]  P. D. Smallwood An Introduction to Risk Sensitivity: The Use of Jensen's Inequality to Clarify Evolutionary Arguments of Adaptation and Constraint , 1996 .

[10]  Kirk A. Moloney,et al.  The Effects of Disturbance Architecture on Landscape-Level Population Dynamics , 1996 .

[11]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[12]  R. Kobe,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in Sapling Mortality and Growth Predicts Geographic Variation in Forest Composition , 1996 .

[13]  Mark Rees,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Competition and Spatial Heterogeneity on the Structure and Dynamics of a Four-Species Guild of Winter Annuals , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[14]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants , 1995 .

[15]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Bispectral analysis and model validation of texture images , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Competition and succession in an aspen-white-pine forest , 1995 .

[17]  Gordon A. Fox,et al.  Population dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants , 1995 .

[18]  J. F. James,et al.  A Student's Guide to Fourier Transforms: With Applications in Physics and Engineering , 1995 .

[19]  Douglas H. Deutschman,et al.  Details That Matter: The Spatial Distribution of Individual Trees Maintains Forest Ecosystem Function , 1995 .

[20]  K Dietz,et al.  Modelling patterns of parasite aggregation in natural populations: trichostrongylid nematode–ruminant interactions as a case study , 1995, Parasitology.

[21]  N. Barton,et al.  Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal? , 1994, Genetics.

[22]  Robert M. May,et al.  Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics , 1994, Nature.

[23]  Mark A. Lewis,et al.  Spatial Coupling of Plant and Herbivore Dynamics: The Contribution of Herbivore Dispersal to Transient and Persistent "Waves" of Damage , 1994 .

[24]  D. Tilman Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[25]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Pathogen invasion and host extinction in lattice structured populations , 1994, Journal of mathematical biology.

[26]  Robert Haining,et al.  Statistics for spatial data: by Noel Cressie, 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 900 p., ISBN 0-471-84336-9, US $89.95 , 1993 .

[27]  T. Kohyama,et al.  Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest-the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species , 1993 .

[28]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Stability and complexity of spatially extended two-species competition* , 1992 .

[29]  Takashi Kohyama Density-size Dynamics of Trees Simulated by a One-sided Competition Multi-species Model of Rain Forest Stands , 1992 .

[30]  T. Nagylaki Introduction to Theoretical Population Genetics , 1992 .

[31]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistence , 1992 .

[32]  T. Kohyama Size-Structured Multi-Species Model of Rain Forest Trees , 1992 .

[33]  Rick Durrett,et al.  Multicolor particle systems with large threshold and range , 1992 .

[34]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The Persistence of Host-Parasitoid Associations in Patchy Environments. I. A General Criterion , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[35]  R. Lande,et al.  Isolation by distance in a quantitative trait. , 1991, Genetics.

[36]  R. May,et al.  The Dynamics of Host-Parasitoid-Pathogen Interactions , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[37]  James B. Grace,et al.  Components of resource competition in plant communities. , 1990 .

[38]  J. Grace On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. , 1990 .

[39]  Maury Bramson,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Crabgrass , 1989 .

[40]  D. Peart SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN A SUCCESSIONAL GRASSLAND. III. EFFECTS OF CANOPY GAPS, GOPHER MOUNDS AND GRAZING ON COLONIZATION , 1989 .

[41]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  The velocity of spatial population expansion , 1990 .

[42]  R. Durrett Lecture notes on particle systems and percolation , 1988 .

[43]  R. May,et al.  Population dynamics and plant community structure: Competition between annuals and perrenials , 1987 .

[44]  P. White,et al.  The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics , 1986 .

[45]  John A. Silander,et al.  Neighborhood interference among velvet leaf, Abutilon theophrasti, and pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus , 1987 .

[46]  Stephen W. Pacala,et al.  Neighborhood Models of Plant Population Dynamics. 4. Single-Species and Multispecies Models of Annuals with Dormant Seeds , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[47]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size variability and competition in plant monocultures , 1986 .

[48]  Stephen W. Pacala,et al.  Neighborhood models of plant population dynamics. 2. Multi-species models of annuals , 1986 .

[49]  S. Pacala,et al.  Neighborhood Models of Plant Population Dynamics. I. Single-Species Models of Annuals , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[50]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Coexistence of Competitors in a Stochastic Environment: The Storage Effect , 1983 .

[51]  M. Westoby Frequency Distributions of Plant Size during Competitive Growth of Stands: the Operation of Distribution-modifying Functions , 1982 .

[52]  K. Gross,et al.  Colonizing Abilities of 'Biennial' Plant Species in Relation to Ground Cover: Implications for their Distributions in a Successional Sere , 1982 .

[53]  Comparison of Factors Determining Growth Rates of Deciduous vs. Broad-leaf Evergreen Trees , 1982 .

[54]  L. L. Doust,et al.  Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens). I. The dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats , 1981 .

[55]  A. Hastings Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space , 1980 .

[56]  R M May,et al.  Evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[57]  I. S. Gradshteyn Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Corrected and Enlarged Edition , 1980 .

[58]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[59]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[60]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[61]  Robert A. Armstrong,et al.  Fugitive Species: Experiments with Fungi and Some Theoretical Considerations , 1976 .

[62]  J. Harper,et al.  The Demography of Plants , 1974 .

[63]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Competition among Fugitive Species in a Harlequin Environment , 1972 .

[64]  R. Levins,et al.  Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[66]  Norman T. J. Bailey,et al.  The Elements of Stochastic Processes with Applications to the Natural Sciences , 1964 .

[67]  S. R. Broadbent,et al.  The Random Walk of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis , 1953 .

[68]  J. G. Skellam Random dispersal in theoretical populations , 1951, Biometrika.