Non-linear Impulse Methods for Aeroelastic Simulations

We present the results of extending the methodology of system identification techniques as proposed by Won et al. to study three-dimensional multimodal structures. Critical to the success of the system identification technique are data representation and the type of training data involved. Once the appropriate model has been identified and trained, subsequent predictions would be efficient and fast. In this work, an algebraic and neural network model were used in lieu of computationally intensive CFD solvers to expediate aeroelastic simulations. The transonic flutter of the AGARD 445.6 wing was used as a test case. To generate the training data necessary for the creation of the system identification models, two approaches were investigated. In the first approach, non-linear filtered impulse signals were applied mode by mode to the dynamical system to obtain the system’s responses. In the other approach, a staggered sequence of filtered impulses was used to elicit the responses in a single CFD run. Results show that generally the non-linear neural network model of radial basis function trained with the staggered filtered impulse signals performed much better than the algebraic autoregressive model.

[1]  Peter Strobach,et al.  Linear Prediction Theory: A Mathematical Basis for Adaptive Systems , 1990 .

[2]  J. Nazuno Haykin, Simon. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, Prentice Hall, Inc. Segunda Edición, 1999 , 2000 .

[3]  T. Ray,et al.  Flutter Simulation and Prediction Via Identification of Non-Linear Impulse Response , 2005 .

[4]  Feng Liu,et al.  Flutter Predictions by a Filtered Impulse Method , 2000 .

[5]  Lakshmi N. Sankar,et al.  Euler solutions for transonic flow past a fighter wing , 1987 .

[6]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[7]  Hermann J. Hassig,et al.  An Approximate True Damping Solution of the Flutter Equation by Determinant Iteration , 1971 .

[8]  Yaochu Jin,et al.  A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation , 2005, Soft Comput..

[9]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[10]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Computer-Controlled Systems: Theory and Design , 1984 .

[11]  Feng Liu,et al.  A strongly-coupled time-marching method for solving the Navier-Stokes and k-omega turbulence model equations with multigrid , 1994 .

[12]  Yoshiaki Nakamura,et al.  Simulation of flow around moving 3D body on unstructured Cartesian grid , 2001 .

[13]  Mani Sadeghi,et al.  Parallel Computation of Wing Flutter with a Coupled Navier-Stokes/CSD Method , 2003 .

[14]  Rolf Jeltsch,et al.  A Higher-Order Boundary Treatment for Cartesian-Grid Methods , 1998 .

[15]  Murray Tobak,et al.  On the use of the indicial-function concept in the analysis of unsteady motions of wings and wing-tail combinations , 1954 .

[16]  David M. Schuster,et al.  Calculation of Airfoil Flutter by an Euler Method with Approximate Boundary Conditions , 2003 .

[17]  H. Tsai,et al.  Unsteady Flow Calculations with a Parallel Multiblock Moving Mesh Algorithm , 2001 .

[18]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[19]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  Implicit approaches for moving boundaries in a 3-D Cartesian method , 2003 .

[20]  P. Goorjian,et al.  Computation of Unsteady Transonic Flows by the Indicial Method , 1977 .

[21]  Y. Zhu,et al.  Unsteady flow calculations with a multi-block moving mesh algorithm , 2000 .

[22]  Shanhong Ji,et al.  Unsteady flow calculations with a multigrid Navier-Stokes method , 1996 .

[23]  Kwok Leung Lai,et al.  A CFD and CSD Interaction Algorithm for Large and Complex Configurations , 2002 .

[24]  Walter A. Silva,et al.  Application of nonlinear systems theory to transonic unsteady aerodynamic responses , 1993 .

[25]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[26]  T. Poggio,et al.  Networks and the best approximation property , 1990, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  John B. Bell,et al.  Cartesian grid method for unsteady compressible flow in irregular regions , 1995 .

[28]  Andrew Arena,et al.  Accelerating computational fluid dynamics based aeroelastic predictions using system identification , 2001 .

[29]  Feng Liu,et al.  Time-Domain Aeroelastic Simulation on Stationary Body-Conforming Grids with Small Perturbation Boundary Conditions , 2004 .

[30]  Her Mann Tsai,et al.  Calculation of Wing Flutter by a Coupled Fluid-Structure Method , 2001 .

[31]  Kwok Leung Lai,et al.  Application of Three-Dimensional Interfaces for Data Transfer in Aeroelastic Computations , 2004 .

[32]  R. H. Ricketts,et al.  Some recent applications of XTRAN3S , 1983 .

[33]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  3D applications of a Cartesian grid Euler method , 1995 .

[34]  N. Sundararajan,et al.  Radial Basis Function Neural Networks with Sequential Learning , 1999 .

[35]  J. B. Malone,et al.  AN IMPLICIT CONSERVATIVE ALGORITHM FOR STEADY AND UNSTEADY THREE-DIMENSIONAL TRANSONIC POTENTIAL FLOWS 81-1016 , 1981 .