Unveiling the uncertainty principle in the QRS complex offset detection on high resolution electrocardiography

The accuracy of high resolution electrocardiographic (HRECG) methods for stratifying the risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmia depends on the fidelity of QRS fiducial points detection. This study aims at examining the effect of acquisition and processing variables in HRECG on the variability of QRS complex offset (QRS offset) detection in simulated and biological signals, as well as investigating the factors related to the so called uncertainty principle applied to HRECG. Successive QRS offset locations were calculated in different signals configurations including HRECG data from patients with and without ventricular late potentials and simulated data using linear and exponential functions. The expected error in QRS offset detection was assessed as a function of: i) signal characteristics (Simulated or Biological); ii) Sampling Frequency (SF); iii) Residual Noise Level (RNL); iv) QRS maximum amplitudes. The uncertainty principle was related to HRECG and a given exponential signals, and increasing RNL up to 0.5 µV. SF and RNL are outstanding factors influencing QRS offset variability. Thus, HRECG related uncertainty principle is a deterministic phenomenon associated with both HRECG signal and mathematical formulation of the terminal decay of the QRS complex to the fusion with the ST segment.

[1]  M. Tarvainen,et al.  High-resolution QRS fiducial point corrections in sparsely sampled ECG recordings. , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[2]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography. A statement by a Task Force Committee between the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. , 1991, European heart journal.

[3]  R. Francés Low noise level unmasks late potentials on signal-averaged electrocardiography. , 2010, Experimental and clinical cardiology.

[4]  P. R. Benchimol Barbosa Noninvasive prognostic markers for cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmia in long-term follow-up of subjects with chronic Chagas' disease. , 2007, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[5]  H. Mølgaard,et al.  Effect of residual noise level on reproducibility of the signal-averaged ECG. , 1996, Journal of Electrocardiology.

[6]  Andreas Voss,et al.  Electrocardiologic and related methods of non-invasive detection and risk stratification in myocardial ischemia: state of the art and perspectives , 2010, German medical science : GMS e-journal.

[7]  W. Zareba,et al.  Evaluation of the Normal Values for Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiogram , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  Renzo Antolini,et al.  Analyzing late ventricular potentials , 1996 .

[9]  Toivo Katila,et al.  QRS Duration in High‐Resolution Methods and Standard ECG in Risk Assessment After First and Recurrent Myocardial Infarctions , 2006, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  A. Grace,et al.  Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death. , 2008, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[11]  V Hombach,et al.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: Proposed Modification of the Task Force Criteria , 2010, Circulation.

[13]  M. Simson Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[14]  P. Sager,et al.  A prospective evaluation of the immediate reproducibility of the signal-averaged ECG. , 1991, American heart journal.

[15]  A. Kadish,et al.  Uncertainty principle of signal-averaged electrocardiography. , 2000, Circulation.

[16]  Federico Lombardi,et al.  Prognostic Value of Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiogram in Chagas Disease , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[17]  G. W. Hoffler,et al.  A spectral analysis of the normal resting electrocardiogram. , 1973, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[18]  P. Savard,et al.  Evaluation of arrhythmic causes of syncope: correlation between Holter monitoring, electrophysiologic testing, and body surface potential mapping. , 1991, American heart journal.

[19]  A. Stuck,et al.  Prediction of Arrhythmic Events after Myocardial Infarction Based on Signal‐Averaged Electrocardiogram and Ejection Fraction , 2008, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[20]  R. Liew Prediction of sudden arrhythmic death following acute myocardial infarction , 2010, Heart.

[21]  P. Caminal,et al.  Alignment methods for averaging of high-resolution cardiac signals: a comparative study of performance , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Jurandir Nadal,et al.  Reduction of electromyographic noise in the signal-averaged electrocardiogram by spectral decomposition , 2003, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[23]  J. P. C. de Weerd,et al.  Accuracy of QRS detection in relation to the analysis of high-frequency components in the electrocardiogram , 1979, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[24]  P. Barbosa Noninvasive prognostic markers for cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmia in long-term follow-up of subjects with chronic Chagas' disease , 2007 .

[25]  Raimon Jané,et al.  Improved alignment method for noisy high-resolution ECG and Holter records using multiscale cross-correlation , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Jurandir Nadal,et al.  Authors reply to comments on "Line patterns in the mosaic electric properties of human skin-a cross correlation study" , 2003 .

[27]  R. S. de Paula,et al.  Time domain analysis of the signal averaged electrocardiogram to detect late potentials in heart failure patients with different etiologies. , 2006, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[28]  J. Bigger,et al.  Importance of the endpoint of noise reduction in analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.