Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany.

Cities are hotspots of plant species richness, harboring more species than their rural surroundings, at least over large enough scales. However, species richness does not necessarily cover all aspects of biodiversity such as phylogenetic relationships. Ignoring these relationships, our understanding of how species assemblages develop and change in a changing environment remains incomplete. Given the high vascular plant species richness of urbanized areas in Germany, we asked whether these also have a higher phylogenetic diversity than rural areas, and whether phylogenetic diversity patterns differ systematically between species groups characterized by specific functional traits. Calculating the average phylogenetic distinctness of the total German flora and accounting for spatial autocorrelation, we show that phylogenetic diversity of urban areas does not reflect their high species richness. Hence, high urban species richness is mainly due to more closely related species that are functionally similar and able to deal with urbanization. This diminished phylogenetic information might decrease the flora's capacity to respond to environmental changes.

[1]  R. Engelman,et al.  Human population in the biodiversity hotspots , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Michael Kleyer,et al.  Validation of plant functional types across two contrasting landscapes , 2002 .

[3]  Andy Purvis,et al.  Hotspots and the conservation of evolutionary history , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Root Gorelick,et al.  Did insect pollination cause increased seed plant diversity , 2001 .

[5]  Calyampudi R. Rao Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach☆ , 1982 .

[6]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[7]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[8]  W. Durka Phylogenie der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands , 2003 .

[9]  Richard Field,et al.  Spatial patterns of woody plant and bird diversity: functional relationships or environmental effects? , 2008 .

[10]  A. Prinzing The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Relating geographical variation in pollination types to environmental and spatial factors using novel statistical methods. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[12]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[13]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus , 2002 .

[14]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[15]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Terminological and methodological aspects of the mapping and analysis of the global biodiversity , 1999 .

[16]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Conservation conflicts across Africa. , 2001, Science.

[17]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Evolutionary Diversification of Continuous Traits: Phylogenetic Tests and Application to Seed Size in the California Flora , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[18]  I. Kühn,et al.  The flora of German cities is naturally species rich , 2004 .

[19]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: a case study of the city of Plzeň , 2003 .

[20]  I. Kühn,et al.  Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe , 2006 .

[21]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  Ecological Character Displacement in Adaptive Radiation , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Matthew R. Helmus,et al.  Separating the determinants of phylogenetic community structure. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[23]  Michael A. McCarthy,et al.  Plant traits and local extinctions in natural grasslands along an urban–rural gradient , 2005 .

[24]  I. Kühn,et al.  Plant distribution patterns in Germany – Will aliens match natives? , 2003 .

[25]  M. Araújo The coincidence of people and biodiversity in Europe , 2003 .

[26]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. , 2006, Ecology.

[27]  D. Faith Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[28]  Jari Niemelä,et al.  Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? , 1999, Urban Ecosystems.

[29]  I. Kühn,et al.  Urbanization and homogenization – Comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany , 2006 .

[30]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[31]  Debra Bailey,et al.  Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organizational levels and spatial scales , 2005 .

[32]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Win-Win Ecology: How the Earth's Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise , 2003 .

[33]  Ingo Kowarik,et al.  On the Role of Alien Species in Urban Flora and Vegetation , 2008 .

[34]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Influence of Phylogeny on Fungal Community Assembly and Ecosystem Functioning , 2007, Science.

[35]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  A comparative test of phylogenetic diversity indices , 2008, Oecologia.

[36]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a review , 2007 .

[37]  C. Gries,et al.  Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Phylogeny and Ecology Reconsidered , 1995 .

[39]  M. Zobel,et al.  The relative of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  W. D. Kissling,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models , 2007 .

[41]  J. Schaminée,et al.  Less lineages - more trait variation: phylogenetically clustered plant communities are functionally more diverse. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[42]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  COMMUNITY AND PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE OF REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS OF WOODY SPECIES IN WET TROPICAL FORESTS , 2003 .

[43]  C. Ricotta,et al.  Exploring taxonomic filtering in urban environments , 2008 .

[44]  Brian J Enquist,et al.  The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. , 2007, Ecology.

[45]  M. Pautasso,et al.  Scale dependence of the correlation between human population presence and vertebrate and plant species richness. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[46]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. , 2006, Ecology.

[47]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Taxonomic distinctness and environmental assessment , 1998 .

[48]  BiolFlor — a new plant‐trait database as a tool for plant invasion ecology , 2004 .