Soft tissue phenotype modification predicts gingival margin long‐term (10‐year) stability: Longitudinal analysis of six randomized clinical trials

Abstract Aim To assess the prognostic value of soft tissue phenotype modification following root coverage procedures for predicting the long‐term (10‐year) behaviour of the gingival margin. Materials and Methods Participants from six randomized clinical trials on root coverage procedures at the University of Michigan were re‐invited for a longitudinal evaluation. Clinical measurements were obtained by two calibrated examiners. A data‐driven approach to model selection with Akaike information criterion (AIC) was carried out via multilevel regression analyses and partial regression plotting for changes in the level of the gingival margin over time and interactions with the early (6‐month) results of soft tissue phenotypic modification. Results One‐hundred and fifty‐seven treated sites in 83 patients were re‐assessed at the long‐term recall. AIC‐driven model selection and regression analyses demonstrated that 6‐month keratinized tissue width (KTW) and gingival thickness (GT) influenced the trajectory of the gingival margin similarly in a concave manner; however, GT was the driving determinant that predicted significantly less relapse in the treatments, with stability of the treated gingival margin obtained beyond values of 1.46 mm. Conclusions Among a compliant patient cohort, irrespective of the rendered therapy, the presence of at least 1.5 mm KTW and 1.46 mm GT was correlated with the long‐term stability of the gingival margin.

[1]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Gingival Phenotype Modification as a Result of Root Coverage Procedure with Two Human Dermal Matrices: Long-Term Assessment of a Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[2]  G. Rasperini,et al.  Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical trial , 2021, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[3]  P. Eickholz,et al.  Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 5-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measurement technology for volumetric comparison of soft tissue changes. , 2021, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Esthetic- and patient-related outcomes following root coverage procedures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2020, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  M. Hürzeler,et al.  Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 2-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measuring for volumetric comparison of gingival dimensions. , 2020, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[6]  A. B. Novaes,et al.  Root coverage using coronally advanced flap with porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial , 2020, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[7]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  An exploratory clinical study evaluating safety and performance of a volume-stable collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap for single gingival recession treatment , 2020, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[8]  P. Eickholz,et al.  Clinical and patient-centered long-term results of root coverage using the envelope technique in a private-practice setting: 10-year results - Case series. , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  M. Nieri,et al.  Coronally Advanced Flap and Composite Restoration of the Enamel with or without Connective Tissue Graft for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession with non-carious cervical lesion. A randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  R. Irizarry ggplot2 , 2019, Introduction to Data Science.

[11]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Long-term assessment of root coverage stability using connective tissue graft with or without an epithelial collar for gingival recession treatment. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial. , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  M. Nieri,et al.  Adjunctive benefit of a Xenogenic Collagen Matrix associated with Coronally Advanced Flap for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. A superiority, assessor-blind, randomized clinical trial. , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  K. Shedden,et al.  The Effect of Time on Root Coverage Outcomes: A Network Meta-analysis , 2019, Journal of dental research.

[14]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Success in Periodontology: an Evolutive Concept. , 2019, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[15]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial. , 2019, Journal of Clinical Periodontology.

[16]  André B Souza,et al.  Influence of the keratinized mucosa on the stability of peri‐implant tissues and brushing discomfort: A 4‐year follow‐up study , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Predictor factors for long‐term outcomes stability of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft in the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: 9 years results of a randomized controlled clinical trial , 2018, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  Daniel Lüdecke,et al.  ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[19]  P. Cortellini,et al.  Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations , 2018, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  M. McGuire,et al.  Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. , 2018, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[21]  F. Graziani,et al.  Xenogenic collagen matrix or autologous connective tissue graft as adjunct to coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recession: Randomized trial assessing non‐inferiority in root coverage and superiority in oral health‐related quality of life , 2017, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[22]  G. Zucchelli,et al.  Coronally Advanced Flap with Site-Specific Application of Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions: A 3-Year Follow-Up Case Series. , 2018, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[23]  J. Buti,et al.  Periodontal regeneration compared with access flap surgery in human intra‐bony defects 20‐year follow‐up of a randomized clinical trial: tooth retention, periodontitis recurrence and costs , 2017, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  M. Nieri,et al.  Clinical efficacy of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions in the aesthetic area: a randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2016, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[25]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Comparison of Freeze-Dried and Solvent-Dehydrated Acellular Dermal Matrix for Root Coverage: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2015, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[26]  G. Zucchelli,et al.  Periodontal plastic surgery , 2015 .

[27]  L. Chambrone,et al.  Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. , 2015, Journal of periodontology.

[28]  D. Kim,et al.  Periodontal soft tissue non-root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. , 2015, Journal of periodontology.

[29]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Comparison of two differently processed acellular dermal matrix products for root coverage procedures: a prospective, randomized multicenter study. , 2014, Journal of periodontology.

[30]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[31]  R. Jung,et al.  Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. , 2014, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[32]  M. Nieri,et al.  Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. , 2014, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[33]  F. Graziani,et al.  Efficacy of periodontal plastic procedures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. , 2014, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[34]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. , 2013, Journal of periodontology.

[35]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Significance of the epithelial collar on the subepithelial connective tissue graft. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[36]  W. Giannobile,et al.  The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure: a pilot human trial. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[37]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[38]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Effect of enamel matrix derivative on collagen guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage procedure. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[39]  Y. Shyr,et al.  Treatment of gingival recession using a collagen membrane with or without the use of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for space maintenance. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[40]  C R Anderegg,et al.  Gingiva thickness in guided tissue regeneration and associated recession at facial furcation defects. , 1995, Journal of periodontology.

[41]  N F Bissada,et al.  Significance of the width of keratinized gingiva on the periodontal status of teeth with submarginal restorations. , 1987, Journal of periodontology.

[42]  M. P. Ruben,et al.  The effect of restorative margins on the postsurgical development and nature of the periodontium. Part I. , 1985, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[43]  P. Miller,et al.  A classification of marginal tissue recession. , 1985, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[44]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[45]  H. Löe,et al.  The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. , 1972, Journal of periodontology.