Drones for justice: inclusive technology and river-related action research along the Kapuas

Abstract. This article discusses the potential of using drones for community-based counter-mapping. Drawing on action research conducted along the Kapuas River in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, we describe how drones were used for political interventions against land grabs by palm oil and mining companies. We share our experience of how to use drones to generate high-resolution aerial photographs that can be stitched together to create GPS-referenced maps that can support local communities' land rights. We argue that do-it-yourself drones can reduce the costs of and expertise hitherto associated with counter-mapping. While this creates the potential for a more inclusive technology, the question of who controls the technology and to what end is a political one. We conclude by comparing two interventions and discuss why the drone technology could be appropriated by local activists in one case but not in the other.

[1]  Counter-mapping Land Grabs with Community Drones in Indonesia , 2015 .

[2]  Maria Gabrielsen Jumbert,et al.  The Good Drone , 2016 .

[3]  Kathy MacKinnon,et al.  The ecology of Kalimantan , 1996 .

[4]  K. Sandvik,et al.  The Rise of the Humanitarian Drone: Giving Content to an Emerging Concept , 2014 .

[5]  M. Flitner,et al.  Recognition through reconnaissance? Using drones for counter-mapping in Indonesia , 2017, De-centring Land Grabbing.

[6]  B. Cruikshank.  The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics , 2010 .

[7]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  Deconstructing Community for Conservation: Why Simple Assumptions are Not Sufficient , 2013, Human Ecology.

[8]  Joel Wainwright,et al.  Cartography, territory, property: postcolonial reflections on indigenous counter-mapping in Nicaragua and Belize , 2009 .

[9]  Brenda Parker.  Constructing Community Through Maps? Power and Praxis in Community Mapping* , 2006 .

[10]  N. Brenner,et al.  Theorizing Sociospatial Relations , 2008 .

[11]  L. Potter.  Dayak resistance to oil palm plantations in West Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2008 .

[12]  N. Peluso.  A political ecology of violence and territory in West Kalimantan , 2008 .

[13]  G. V. Klinken,et al.  Blood, Timber, and the State in West Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2008 .

[14]  Sara Ahmed,et al.  Social Learning, academics and NGOs , 2007 .

[15]  F. Molle,et al.  Scales and power in river basin management: the Chao Phraya River in Thailand1 , 2007 .

[16]  Marta Conde.  Activism mobilising science , 2014 .

[17]  J. Bryan.  Walking the line: Participatory mapping, indigenous rights, and neoliberalism , 2011 .

[18]  J. B. Harley,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP , 1989 .

[19]  Laura Smith,et al.  Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research , 2010 .

[20]  C. Hunsberger.  The palm oil controversy in Southeast Asia: a transnational perspective , 2014 .

[21]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[22]  S. Wich,et al.  Dawn of Drone Ecology: Low-Cost Autonomous Aerial Vehicles for Conservation , 2012 .

[23]  M. Chapin,et al.  MAPPING INDIGENOUS LANDS , 2005 .

[24]  N. Peluso.  WHOSE WOODS ARE THESE? COUNTER‐MAPPING FOREST TERRITORIES IN KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA , 1995 .

[25]  M. Eilenberg.  Shades of green and REDD: Local and global contestations over the value of forest versus plantation development on the Indonesian forest frontier , 2015 .

[26]  Scot E. Smith,et al.  Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Low-Altitude Aerial Surveys , 2010 .