Susceptibility-weighted imaging at 7 T: Improved diagnosis of cerebral cavernous malformations and associated developmental venous anomalies☆☆☆

Background and aim In the diagnosis of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) magnetic resonance imaging is established as the gold standard. Conventional MRI techniques have their drawbacks in the diagnosis of CCMs and associated venous malformations (DVAs). The aim of our study was to evaluate susceptibility weighted imaging SWI for the detection of CCM and associated DVAs at 7 T in comparison with 3 T. Patients and methods 24 patients (14 female, 10 male; median age: 38.3 y (21.1 y–69.1 y) were included in the study. Patients enrolled in the study received a 3 T and a 7 T MRI on the same day. The following sequences were applied on both field strengths: a T1 weighted 3D GRE sequence (MP-RAGE) and a SWI sequence. After obtaining the study MRIs, eleven patients underwent surgery and 13 patients were followed conservatively or were treated radio-surgically. Results Patients initially presented with haemorrhage (n = 4, 16.7%), seizures (n = 2, 8.3%) or other neurology (n = 18, 75.0%). For surgical resected lesions histopathological findings verified the diagnosis of CCMs. A significantly higher number of CCMs was diagnosed at 7 T SWI sequences compared with 3 T SWI (p < 0.05). Additionally diagnosed lesions on 7 T MRI were significantly smaller compared to the initial lesions on 3 T MRIs (p < 0.001). Further, more associated DVAs were diagnosed at 7 T MRI compared to 3 T MRI. Conclusion SWI sequences at ultra-high-field MRI improve the diagnosis of CCMs and associated DVAs and therefore add important pre-operative information.

[1]  John R. Robinson,et al.  Natural history of the cavernous angioma. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  C. Elger,et al.  Seizure Outcome after Resection of Supratentorial Cavernous Malformations: A Study of 168 Patients , 2007, Epilepsia.

[3]  P. Novak,et al.  Venous cavernoma at 8 Tesla MRI. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  G. Tung,et al.  MRI of cerebral microhemorrhages. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) , 2004, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[6]  J. Hainfellner,et al.  Cerebral cavernous malformations: congruency of histopathological features with the current clinical definition , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[7]  E. Haacke,et al.  Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 1 , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[8]  P. Cappabianca,et al.  Supratentorial cavernous malformations and epilepsy: seizure outcome after lesionectomy on a series of 35 patients , 1997, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[9]  J. Kuratsu,et al.  Clinical implications of associated venous drainage in patients with cavernous malformation. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  M. Ladd,et al.  Susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral cavernous malformations: prospects, drawbacks, and first experience at ultra-high field strength (7-Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[11]  G. Wurm,et al.  Cerebral Cavernous Malformations Associated with Venous Anomalies: Surgical Considerations , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[12]  Z. Wu,et al.  Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications, Part 2 , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  S. Nelson,et al.  Advances in ultra-high field MRI for the clinical management of patients with brain tumors. , 2011, Current opinion in neurology.

[14]  Mark E Ladd,et al.  High-Field-Strength Magnetic Resonance: Potential and Limits , 2007, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[15]  L Bozzao,et al.  Delayed increase in infarct volume after cerebral ischemia: correlations with thrombolytic treatment and clinical outcome. , 1999, Stroke.

[16]  Oliver Kraff,et al.  Imaging of adult astrocytic brain tumours with 7 T MRI: preliminary results , 2010, European Radiology.

[17]  I. Awad,et al.  Emerging clinical imaging techniques for cerebral cavernous malformations: a systematic review. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[18]  P. Schmiedek Cerebral cavernomas in the adult. Review of the literature and analysis of 72 surgically treated patients , 2001, Neurosurgical Review.

[19]  J R Reichenbach,et al.  Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. , 1997, Radiology.

[20]  M. Lawton,et al.  Cavernous malformations of the brainstem: experience with 100 patients. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  A. Hasso,et al.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis of cerebral vascular pathology: A pictorial review , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[22]  C. Baumgartner,et al.  LONG‐TERM SEIZURE CONTROL AFTER RESECTION OF SUPRATENTORIAL CAVERNOMAS: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE‐CENTER STUDY IN 53 PATIENTS , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[23]  Antonio Belli,et al.  TEMPORAL WINDOW OF METABOLIC BRAIN VULNERABILITY TO CONCUSSIONS: OXIDATIVE AND NITROSATIVE STRESSES—PART II , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[24]  Michael Weber,et al.  Improved Preoperative Evaluation of Cerebral Cavernomas by High-Field, High-Resolution Susceptibility-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla: Comparison With Standard (1.5 T) Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Correlation With Histopathological Findings—Preliminary Results , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[25]  Oliver Kraff,et al.  Cerebral cavernous hemangiomas at 7 Tesla: initial experience. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[26]  I. Awad,et al.  Intracranial cavernous angioma: a practical review of clinical and biological aspects. , 2005, Surgical neurology.