Market Design with Endogenous Preferences

This paper explores the interdependence between market structure and an important class of extra-rational cognitive biases. Starting with a familiar bilateral monopoly framework, we characterize the endogenous emergence of preference distortions during bargaining which cause negotiators to perceive their private valuations di?erently than they would outside the adversarial negotiation context. Using this model, we then demonstrate how a number of external interventions in the structure and/or organization of market interactions (occurring before trade, after trade, or during negotiations themselves) can profoundly alter the nature of these dispositions. Our results demonstrate that many such interventions frequently (though not always) share qualitatively similar characteristics to market interventions that are often proposed for overcoming more conventional forms of market failure. Nevertheless, our analysis underscores the importance of understanding the precise link between cognitive failures and market structure prior to the implementation any particular proposed reform. Market Design with Endogenous Preferences Aviad Heifetz∗ Ella Segev† Eric Talley‡

[1]  Yaacov Z. Bergman,et al.  Ecologies of Preferences with Envy as an Antidote to Risk-Aversion in Bargaining , 2000 .

[2]  Jeffrey J. Rachlinski,et al.  Remedies and the Psychology of Ownership , 1998 .

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[4]  Aviad Heifetz,et al.  What to Maximize If You Must , 2002 .

[5]  Jeffrey C. Ely,et al.  Evolution of Preferences , 2007 .

[6]  D. Bergemann,et al.  Robust Mechanism Design , 2003 .

[7]  Jennifer Arlen,et al.  Endowment Effects within Corporate Agency Relationships , 2001 .

[8]  C. Plott psychology and economics , 1990 .

[9]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Switching the Default Rule , 2001 .

[10]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Read My Lips, Watch for Leaps: Preference Equilibrium and Political Instability , 2006 .

[11]  Aviad Heifetz,et al.  What to Maximize If You Must , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  Christine Jolls,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Behavioral Economic Analysis of Redistributive Legal Rules , 1998 .

[14]  Ian Ayres,et al.  Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement To Facilitate Coasean Trade , 1995 .

[15]  A. Heifetz,et al.  The Dynamic Evolution of Preferences , 2007 .

[16]  Steffen Huck,et al.  The Indirect Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Fair Allocations , 1999 .

[17]  Albert S. Kyle,et al.  Speculation Duopoly with Agreement to Disagree: Can Overconfidence Survive the Market Test? , 1997 .

[18]  Herbert Dawid,et al.  Evolutionary Bargaining with Cooperative Investments , 2002 .

[19]  W. MacLeod,et al.  How Should a Behavioral Economist Do Welfare Economics? , 2002 .

[20]  David I. Laibson,et al.  Dynamic Choices of Hyperbolic Consumers , 2001 .

[21]  Ariel Porat,et al.  Anti‐insurance , 2002, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[22]  P. Cramton,et al.  Dissolving a Partnership Efficiently , 1985 .

[23]  Georg Kirchsteiger,et al.  Learning to Like What You Have - Explaining the Endowment Effect , 1997 .

[24]  Eric L. Talley,et al.  Trade Secrets and Mutual Investments , 2000 .

[25]  Thomas H. Jackson,et al.  Cases, problems, and materials on bankruptcy , 2007 .

[26]  U. Witt Explaining process and change : approaches to evolutionary economics , 1992 .

[27]  K. McConnell,et al.  A Review of Wta/Wtp Studies , 2000 .

[28]  M. Satterthwaite,et al.  Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading , 1983 .

[29]  Larry Samuelson,et al.  Introduction to the Evolution of Preferences , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[30]  Efe A. Ok,et al.  The Strategic Advantage of Negatively Interdependent Preferences , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[31]  Alexandros Benos,et al.  Aggressiveness and survival of overconfident traders , 1998 .

[32]  Jeffrey C. Ely,et al.  Nash Equilibrium and the Evolution of Preferences , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[33]  Kalyan Chatterjee,et al.  Bargaining under Incomplete Information , 1983, Oper. Res..

[34]  Alex Possajennikov,et al.  On the evolutionary stability of altruistic and spiteful preferences , 2000 .

[35]  Friedel Bolle,et al.  Is altruism evolutionarily stable? And envy and malevolence?: Remarks on Bester and Guth , 2000 .

[36]  Stewart Patrick,et al.  Good intentions : pledges of aid for postconflict recovery , 2000 .

[37]  Aviad Heifetz,et al.  The Evolutionary Role of Toughness in Bargaining , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[38]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Social Rewards Externalities and Stable Preferences , 1998 .

[39]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Why do we care what others think about us , 1997 .

[40]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-serving Biases , 1997 .

[41]  David M. Kreps Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives , 1997 .

[42]  Efe A. Ok,et al.  Evolution of Interdependent Preferences in Aggregative Games , 2000, Games Econ. Behav..

[43]  J. Guttman On the evolutionary stability of preferences for reciprocity , 2000 .

[44]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  Altruism, Egoism, and Genetic Fitness: Economics and Sociobiology , 1976 .

[45]  Nabil I. Al-Najjar,et al.  The Sunk Cost Bias and Managerial Pricing Practices , 2005 .

[46]  Rajiv Sethi,et al.  Preference Evolution and Reciprocity , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[47]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  The Limit of Public Policy: Endogenous Preferences , 2000 .