Socio-demographic and structural barriers to being tested for chlamydia in general practice.

OBJECTIVES To investigate socio-demographic and structural factors associated with not providing a specimen for chlamydia testing following a request by a general practitioner. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional analysis of chlamydia testing data for men and women aged 16-29 years attending general practice clinics participating in a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a chlamydia testing intervention. The study period was the 2013 calendar year. OUTCOME The proportion of chlamydia test requests for which the patient did not provide a specimen for testing. RESULTS During the study period, there were 13 225 chlamydia test requests, for which a chlamydia test was not performed in 2545 instances (19.2%; 95% CI, 16.5-22.3%). Multivariate analysis indicated that the odds for not undertaking a requested test were higher for men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), those aged 16-19 years (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4), those living in areas of greater socio-economic disadvantage (aOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4 for each additional quintile of Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage), and those attending clinics without on-site pathology collection (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9). CONCLUSION One in five young people did not submit a specimen for chlamydia testing despite their GP requesting it. This highlights the need for clinics to establish systems which ensure that men and those aged 16-19 years undertake chlamydia tests requested by a GP.

[1]  B. Ward,et al.  Which dimensions of access are most important when rural residents decide to visit a general practitioner for non-emergency care? , 2015, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[2]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Chlamydia prevalence in young attenders of rural and regional primary care services in Australia: a cross‐sectional survey , 2014, The Medical journal of Australia.

[3]  P. Norman,et al.  Beliefs about chlamydia testing amongst young people living in relatively deprived areas. , 2013, Journal of public health.

[4]  M. Stafford,et al.  It matters what you measure: a systematic literature review examining whether young people in poorer socioeconomic circumstances are more at risk of chlamydia , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[5]  R. Campbell,et al.  Could a peer-led intervention increase uptake of chlamydia screening? A proof of principle pilot study , 2012, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[6]  Douglas Boyle,et al.  A Systematic Mechanism for the Ethical Collection and Interpretation of Display Format Pathology Test Results from Australian Primary Care Records , 2011 .

[7]  Clare Heal,et al.  Australian general practitioner chlamydia testing rates among young people , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[8]  N. Perry,et al.  A pilot qualitative analysis of the psychosocial factors which drive young people to decline chlamydia testing in the UK: implications for health promotion and screening , 2010, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[9]  J. Hocking,et al.  Innovative Resources Could Help Improve Partner Notification for Chlamydia in Primary Care , 2009, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[10]  H. Cameron,et al.  Rural pathology under the microscope. , 2009, The Australian journal of rural health.

[11]  J. Hocking,et al.  What needs to change to increase chlamydia screening in general practice in Australia? The views of general practitioners , 2008, BMC public health.

[12]  C. Heffernan,et al.  Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia: a pilot study into male perspectives on provision of Chlamydia screening in a UK university. , 2008, Journal of public health.

[13]  J. Hocking,et al.  Chlamydia testing and notification in Australia: more money, more tests , 2008, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[14]  J. Hocking,et al.  Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice , 2008, BMC infectious diseases.

[15]  D. Dewitt,et al.  Analysis to synergy: why coordination of rural initiatives at metropolitan universities is important and timely. , 2007, The Australian journal of rural health.

[16]  Rhian Parker,et al.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature , 2006, BMC public health.

[17]  L. Bryson,et al.  Choice of GP: who do young rural women prefer? , 1998, The Australian journal of rural health.