A Cloaking Mechanism to Mitigate Market Manipulation

We propose a cloaking mechanism to deter spoofing, a form of manipulation in financial markets. The mechanism works by symmetrically concealing a specified number of price levels from the inside of the order book. To study the effectiveness of cloaking, we simulate markets populated with background traders and an exploiter, who strategically spoofs to profit. The traders follow two representative bidding strategies: the non-spoofable zero intelligence and the manipulable heuristic belief learning. Through empirical game-theoretic analysis across parametrically different environments, we evaluate surplus accrued by traders, and characterize the conditions under which cloaking mitigates manipulation and benefits market welfare. We further design sophisticated spoofing strategies that probe to reveal cloaked information, and find that the effort and risk exceed the gains.

[1]  Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft Limit order flow, market impact and optimal order sizes: Evidence from NASDAQ TotalView-ITCH data , 2011 .

[2]  J. Meigs,et al.  WHO Technical Report , 1954, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[3]  Matt Prewitt High-Frequency Trading: Should Regulators Do More , 2012 .

[4]  Blaine Nelson,et al.  Can machine learning be secure? , 2006, ASIACCS '06.

[5]  Andri Fannar Bergþórsson What Is Market Manipulation? , 2018, Brill Research Perspectives in International Banking and Securities Law.

[6]  Tanmoy Chakraborty,et al.  Market making and mean reversion , 2011, EC '11.

[7]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Spoofing the Limit Order Book: An Agent-Based Model , 2017, AAMAS.

[8]  中山 幹夫,et al.  Games and Economic Behavior of Bounded Rationality , 2016 .

[9]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Empirical mechanism design: methods, with application to a supply-chain scenario , 2006, EC '06.

[10]  Thierry Foucault,et al.  Market Making with Costly Monitoring: An Analysis of the SOES Controversy , 2003 .

[11]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Learning unfair trading: A market manipulation analysis from the reinforcement learning perspective , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS).

[12]  Danny Weyns,et al.  Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems : Special Issue on Environments for Multiagent Systems , 2007 .

[13]  David M. Pennock,et al.  An Empirical Game-Theoretic Analysis of Price Discovery in Prediction Markets , 2016, IJCAI.

[14]  Steven Gjerstad,et al.  The Competitive Market Paradox , 2007 .

[15]  E. Lee,et al.  Microstructure-Based Manipulation: Strategic Behavior and Performance of Spoofing Traders , 2009 .

[16]  Dhananjay K. Gode,et al.  Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero-Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  M. Pollack Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research: Preface , 2001 .