A Design Framework for Instrumenting Analytic Provenance for Problem-Solving Tasks

In the context of analytics applications, the recall of interaction history often happens when users are identifying the root causes of a given problem based on a visual analytics task, which can be interrupted or suspended. The research of analytic provenance focuses on retrieving users’ interaction history, reinstating their reasoning process so that they can quickly resume an interrupted or suspended task. Although many visualization analytic tools are available, they lack extended capabilities for giving access to users’ interaction history in a natural coupling with their actions. We propose a design framework for instrumenting analytic provenance in a mode allowing users to “re-commit” to their tasks. We realize a first experiment to see how one’s history activities has an impact on the way he/she resolves the task. We investigate the interaction possibilities of two design approaches: the user interface (UI) design in which the history path is considered as “put down” in the environment; the user experience (UX) design considers it as a coupling device between the user and the world, being “in hand” mode. The first part of our analysis shows that users use the history path for supporting their reasoning process. However, the indirect coupling between users’ actions and provenance function keeps them outside of the history path so that they cannot easily link it to their current problem. We hypothesize that the “in hand” mode of interaction history will allow a natural coupling between a user’s action and the provenance function, which may lead to a positive user experience. We then propose the lines for designing dynamic history path interaction tools.

[1]  Bongshin Lee,et al.  GraphTrail: analyzing large multivariate, heterogeneous networks while supporting exploration history , 2012, CHI.

[2]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Graphical Histories for Visualization: Supporting Analysis, Communication, and Evaluation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Pierre Morizet-Mahoudeaux,et al.  First Steps towards the Emergence of Emotions in Interaction Design , 2016 .

[4]  Indira Thouvenin,et al.  Designing the ground for pleasurable experience , 2007, DPPI.

[5]  N. Cowan What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[6]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  VisTrails: enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[7]  Cheryl Z. Qian,et al.  Capturing and supporting the analysis process , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[8]  Chris North,et al.  Analytic provenance: process+interaction+insight , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Kate Herd,et al.  SenseMap: Supporting browser-based online sensemaking through analytic provenance , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[10]  Michael G. Lamming,et al.  Activity-based Information Retrieval: Technology in Support of Personal Memory , 1992, IFIP Congress.

[11]  Cheng Deng,et al.  HindSight: Encouraging Exploration through Direct Encoding of Personal Interaction History , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.