Predictive Modeling of Biogas Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Mixed Kitchen Waste at Mesophilic Temperature

Growth of population is directly influencing the municipal solid waste generation rate. Although, kitchen waste is disposed of mostly in developing countries and its potential of biogas production is not explored well. Anaerobic digestion provides opportunity of twofold benefits i.e. pollution abutment for environmental protection and biogas generation for sharing energy load. Present study was intended to understand the biogas production process at mesophilic temperature (37°C). The organic waste from kitchen was used to make up substrate, which was anaerobically digested in an experimental continues stirred tank reactor (CSTR). Inhibition phase was detected when the graph was plotted for first 60 days and about 28th day it was inhabited. Biogas production from recovered condition was subjected to statistical analysis. Simple regression yielded a good predictive model that gave a correlation of 0.995 despite of including the inhibition phase in complete analysis. An acceptable agreement between observed and modeled biogas production (BGP) rates has vetted sanctity of regression based predictive model. Such models can also be used to keep check on digestion process for optimization of biogas yield and deciding the substrate feeding rate and concentration on time scale.

[1]  G. K. Kafle,et al.  Ensiling of fish industry waste for biogas production: a lab scale evaluation of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and kinetics. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[2]  L Giusti,et al.  A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. , 2009, Waste management.

[3]  Navneet Kumar,et al.  Drinking water quality management through correlation studies among various physico­chemical parameters: A case study , 2010 .

[4]  V. Gunaseelan Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review , 1997 .

[5]  Y. R. Chen,et al.  Substrate utilization kinetic model for biological treatment process , 1980, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  L De Baere,et al.  Will anaerobic digestion of solid waste survive in the future , 2006 .

[7]  J. P. Frost,et al.  Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of concentrated pig manure and grass silage. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Y. R. Chen,et al.  Kinetic analysis of anaerobic digestion of pig manure and its design implications , 1983 .

[9]  K. McMahon,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--I. Digester performance. , 2001, Water research.

[10]  G. Tchobanoglous,et al.  Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues , 1993 .

[11]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Victoria E. Santos,et al.  Kinetic model for anaerobic digestion of livestock manure , 1999 .

[13]  Animesh Agarwal,et al.  Assessment of pollution by Physicochemical Water Parameters Using Regression Analysis: A Case Study of Gagan River at Moradabad- India , 2011 .