Sequential origin in the high performance properties of orb spider dragline silk

Major ampullate (MA) dragline silk supports spider orb webs, combining strength and extensibility in the toughest biomaterial. MA silk evolved ~376 MYA and identifying how evolutionary changes in proteins influenced silk mechanics is crucial for biomimetics, but is hindered by high spinning plasticity. We use supercontraction to remove that variation and characterize MA silk across the spider phylogeny. We show that mechanical performance is conserved within, but divergent among, major lineages, evolving in correlation with discrete changes in proteins. Early MA silk tensile strength improved rapidly with the origin of GGX amino acid motifs and increased repetitiveness. Tensile strength then maximized in basal entelegyne spiders, ~230 MYA. Toughness subsequently improved through increased extensibility within orb spiders, coupled with the origin of a novel protein (MaSp2). Key changes in MA silk proteins therefore correlate with the sequential evolution high performance orb spider silk and could aid design of biomimetic fibers.

[1]  Manuel Elices,et al.  Mechanical behavior of silk during the evolution of orb-web spinning spiders. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.

[2]  Z. Shao,et al.  Extended wet-spinning can modify spider silk properties. , 2005, Chemical communications.

[3]  Manuel Elices,et al.  The hidden link between supercontraction and mechanical behavior of spider silks. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[4]  D. Porter,et al.  Proline and processing of spider silks. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[5]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Tangled in a sparse spider web: single origin of orb weavers and their spinning work unravelled by denser taxonomic sampling , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  F. Vollrath,et al.  The Role of Behavior in the Evolution of Spiders, Silks, and Webs , 2007 .

[7]  Andrew T. Sensenig,et al.  Behavioural and biomaterial coevolution in spider orb webs , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[8]  Oskar Liivak,et al.  Supercontraction and Backbone Dynamics in Spider Silk: 13C and 2H NMR Studies , 2000 .

[9]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata (Fabricius 1775) , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Martín J. Ramírez,et al.  Atlas of phylogenetic data for entelegyne spiders (Araneae: Araneomorphae: Entelegynae) with comments on their phylogeny , 2005 .

[11]  K. Dittmar,et al.  A MaSp2-like gene found in the Amazon mygalomorph spider Avicularia juruensis. , 2010, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[12]  F Vollrath,et al.  Variability in the mechanical properties of spider silks on three levels: interspecific, intraspecific and intraindividual. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[13]  C. Riekel,et al.  Aspects of X-ray diffraction on single spider fibers. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[14]  Robert W. Work,et al.  Dimensions, Birefringences, and Force-Elongation Behavior of Major and Minor Ampullate Silk Fibers from Orb-Web-Spinning Spiders—The Effects of Wetting on these Properties , 1977 .

[15]  Paul A. Selden,et al.  Fossil evidence for the origin of spider spinnerets, and a proposed arachnid order , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  How super is supercontraction? Persistent versus cyclic responses to humidity in spider dragline silk , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  Todd A. Blackledge,et al.  Variation in the material properties of spider dragline silk across species , 2006 .

[18]  D. Maddison,et al.  Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6 , 2009 .

[19]  D. Porter,et al.  Two mechanisms for supercontraction in Nephila spider dragline silk. , 2011, Biomacromolecules.

[20]  R. Lewis,et al.  Structure of a protein superfiber: spider dragline silk. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Sean P Kelly,et al.  Spider orb webs rely on radial threads to absorb prey kinetic energy , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  M Elices,et al.  Silkworm silk as an engineering material , 1998 .

[23]  R. Lewis,et al.  Extreme Diversity, Conservation, and Convergence of Spider Silk Fibroin Sequences , 2001, Science.

[24]  C. Michal,et al.  Strain Dependent Local Phase Transitions Observed during Controlled Supercontraction Reveal Mechanisms in Spider Silk , 2004 .

[25]  G. Plaza,et al.  Supercontraction of dragline silk spun by lynx spiders (Oxyopidae). , 2010, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[26]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  Bioprospecting Finds the Toughest Biological Material: Extraordinary Silk from a Giant Riverine Orb Spider , 2010, PloS one.

[27]  Yi Liu,et al.  Relationships between supercontraction and mechanical properties of spider silk , 2005, Nature materials.

[28]  Jonathan A Coddington,et al.  Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Nonlinear material behaviour of spider silk yields robust webs , 2012, Nature.

[30]  E. Yang,et al.  Insect form vision as one potential shaping force of spider web decoration design , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[31]  David L Kaplan,et al.  Silk as a Biomaterial. , 2007, Progress in polymer science.

[32]  T. Blackledge,et al.  Evolution of supercontraction in spider silk: structure–function relationship from tarantulas to orb-weavers , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  A. Summers,et al.  SPIDER DRAGLINE SILK: CORRELATED AND MOSAIC EVOLUTION IN HIGH-PERFORMANCE BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  H. Hansma,et al.  Molecular nanosprings in spider capture-silk threads , 2003, Nature materials.

[35]  Z. Shao,et al.  Elasticity of spider silks. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[36]  M. Elices,et al.  Controlled supercontraction tailors the tensile behaviour of spider silk , 2003 .

[37]  N. Ayoub,et al.  Untangling spider silk evolution with spidroin terminal domains , 2010, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[38]  John M Gosline,et al.  Consequences of forced silking. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[39]  Manuel Elices,et al.  Bioinspired Fibers Follow the Track of Natural Spider Silk , 2011 .

[40]  C. Hayashi,et al.  Early Events in the Evolution of Spider Silk Genes , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  Sarah Rauscher,et al.  Proline and glycine control protein self-organization into elastomeric or amyloid fibrils. , 2006, Structure.