The effect of static cyclotorsion compensation on refractive and visual outcomes using the Schwind Amaris laser platform for the correction of high astigmatism.

PURPOSE To compare the refractive and visual outcomes using the Schwind Amaris excimer laser in patients with high astigmatism (>1D) with and without the static cyclotorsion compensation (SCC) algorithm available with this new laser platform. METHODS 70 consecutive eyes with ≥1D astigmatism were randomized to treatment with compensation of static cyclotorsion (SCC group- 35 eyes) or not (control group- 35 eyes). A previously validated optimized aspheric ablation algorithm profile was used in every case. All patients underwent LASIK with a microkeratome cut flap. RESULTS The SCC and control group did not differ preoperatively, in terms of refractive error, magnitude of astigmatism or in terms of cardinal or oblique astigmatism. Following treatment, average deviation from target was SEq +0.16D, SD±0.52 D, range -0.98 D to +1.71 D in the SCC group compared to +0.46 D, SD±0.61 D, range -0.25 D to +2.35 D in the control group, which was statistically significant (p<0.05). Following treatment, average astigmatism was 0.24 D (SD±0.28 D, range -1.01 D to 0.00 D) in the SCC group compared to 0.46 D (SD±0.42 D, range -1.80 D to 0.00 D) in the control group, which was highly statistically significant (p<0.005). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative uncorrected vision when the aspheric algorithm was used although there was a trend to increased number of lines gained in the SCC group. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that static cyclotorsion is accurately compensated for by the Schwind Amaris laser platform. The compensation of static cyclotorsion in patients with moderate astigmatism produces a significant improvement in refractive and astigmatic outcomes than when not compensated.

[1]  Samuel Arba-Mosquera,et al.  Excimer laser correction of moderate to high astigmatism with a non‐wavefront‐guided aberration‐free ablation profile: Six‐month results , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  E. M. Smith,et al.  Comparison of astigmatic axis in the seated and supine positions. , 1994, Journal of refractive and corneal surgery.

[3]  I. Aslanides,et al.  LASIK for myopia and astigmatism using the SCHWIND AMARIS excimer laser: an international multicenter trial. , 2010, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  D. Chernyak,et al.  Cyclotorsional eye motion occurring between wavefront measurement and refractive surgery , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  Roger F Steinert,et al.  Rotational malposition during laser in situ keratomileusis. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Samuel Arba-Mosquera,et al.  Clinical effects of pure cyclotorsional errors during refractive surgery. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  J. Talamo,et al.  Cyclotorsion in the seated and supine patient , 1995, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  Y. Tano,et al.  Using a reference point and videokeratography for intraoperative identification of astigmatism axis , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  T. Seiler,et al.  Maximum permissible torsional misalignment in aberration‐sensing and wavefront‐guided corneal ablation , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  M. Arbelaez,et al.  The SCHWIND AMARIS Total-Tech Laser as An All-Rounder in Refractive Surgery , 2009, Middle East African journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  John Chang,et al.  Cyclotorsion during laser in situ keratomileusis , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.