Factors affecting performance of target acquisition tasks for touchpads

This study investigates the effect of touchpad size , position filter, and control display gain on user performance. Observations include the behavior of user while using the touchpad to acquire color-changing targets. This study examines the effect of two touchpad sizes, which consist of large (100◊60 mm) and small (65◊36 mm) sizes, position filters (30, 50), and control-display gains (0.5, 1, 2) on acquiring targ ets that appeared in eight positions (0 °, 45 °, 90 °, 135 °, 180 °, 225 °, 270 °, 315 °), at three distances (100, 300, 500 pixel) and 3 d ifferent levels of target size (10, 40, 70 pixel). As for th e results, touchpad size significantly affects movement time, error count, movement count, and re-entry count. Position filter also significantly affects the re-entry count. The diffe rent behavior of touchpad user differs significantly regarding to performance measurements. Filter 50 and Gain 2 for primary movement and Filter 30 and Gain 0.5 for secondary movement are the best combinations for participants to achieve optimum performance. Based on Fitts’ Law, the proposed model successfully predicts movement time by adding the effect of CD gain in formulating the task’s difficulty index (R≤ = 0.8147). The results in this study will be useful for microe lectronic companies to increase touchpad performance and to offer suggestions for designing touchpads based on optimal settings. Furthermore, this study also reveals that each type of touchpad features different settings to achieve optimum performance.

[1]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for Accessing Remote Screen Content on Touch- and Pen-Operated Systems , 2003, INTERACT.

[2]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  RubberEdge: reducing clutching by combining position and rate control with elastic feedback , 2007, UIST.

[3]  Shelby Thompson,et al.  Gain and Angle of Approach Effects on Cursor-Positioning Time with a Mouse in Consideration of Fitts' Law , 2004 .

[4]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Virtual environments and advanced interface design , 1995 .

[5]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Changes in applied force to a touchpad during pointing tasks , 2002 .

[6]  Michael Bohan,et al.  Kinematic analysis of multiple constraints on a pointing task. , 2007, Human movement science.

[7]  Todd J. Johnsgard.  Fitt?s law with a virtual reality glove and a mouse: effects of gain , 1994 .

[8]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  TouchGrid: Touchpad pointing by recursively mapping taps to smaller display regions , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[9]  Joel S. Greenstein,et al.  Optimizing the Touch Tablet: The Effects of Control-Display Gain and Method of Cursor Control , 1986 .

[10]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing , 2003, CHI '03.

[11]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Powermice and user performance , 1990, CHI '90.

[12]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  A comparison of three selection techniques for touchpads , 1998, CHI.

[13]  Thomas G. Whisenand,et al.  Effects of angle of approach on cursor movement with a mouse: Consideration of Fitt's law , 1996 .

[14]  Denis Mottet,et al.  Behind Fitts' law: kinematic patterns in goal-directed movements , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Pointing on a computer display , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[16]  R Catrambone,et al.  Aggregation Bias and the Use of Regression in Evaluating Models of Human Performance , 1993, Human factors.

[17]  Pourang Irani,et al.  ARC-Pad: absolute+relative cursor positioning for large displays with a mobile touchscreen , 2009, UIST '09.

[18]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard , 1999, CHI '99.

[19]  Daniel W. Repperger,et al.  Fitts' law and the microstructure of rapid discrete movements. , 1980 .