The biologic relevance of daily dose variations in adaptive treatment planning.

PURPOSE To explore the biologic relevance of deviations from the intended uniform fractionation scheme. METHODS AND MATERIALS We study the effect of the variance of the dose per fraction on the normalized total dose (NTD), which incorporates the linear-quadratic model of radiation effects. In regions of steep dose gradients, we determine the shift between NTD isodose lines and physical isodose lines. We also look at ways to compensate for dose-variation effects through dose adjustments, without changing the number of fractions. RESULTS Simple equations quantify effects of dose variation on the NTD. If the standard deviation of the dose is 10% of the daily dose fraction, the effects on the NTD for a given point in the irradiated area are always less than 1%, independent of the biologic parameters. In adaptive dose-correction schemes, the dose correction should be applied uniformly over the remaining fractions, to minimize the variance. Incomplete repair leads to a coupling of doses delivered on different days, which complicates the issue. Repopulation appears to be insignificant in the context of this study (constant overall treatment time). CONCLUSIONS A variation of the dose between fractions always leads to a larger biologic effect than does the same total dose delivered with standard uniform fractionation. The increase in NTD is negligible if the standard deviation of the dose is less than 10% of the dose per fraction.

[1]  P. Lambin,et al.  Hypersensitivity to very-low single radiation doses: its relationship to the adaptive response and induced radioresistance. , 1996, Mutation research.

[2]  J. Leong,et al.  Implementation of random positioning error in computerised radiation treatment planning systems as a result of fractionation. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Jake Van Dyk,et al.  Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect. , 2004, Medical physics.

[4]  J. Flickinger,et al.  Use of normalized total dose to represent the biological effect of fractionated radiotherapy. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: statistical analysis and simulation. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  R K Sachs,et al.  The mechanistic basis of the linear-quadratic formalism. , 1998, Medical physics.

[8]  Mikael Karlsson,et al.  The effect of fraction time in intensity modulated radiotherapy: theoretical and experimental evaluation of an optimisation problem. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Linda Hong,et al.  The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of intensity-modulated field with a multileaf collimator. , 2003, Medical physics.

[10]  G. Barendsen,et al.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  D. Yan,et al.  Adaptive radiation therapy , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  R K Sachs,et al.  The link between low-LET dose-response relations and the underlying kinetics of damage production/repair/misrepair. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[13]  H. Paganetti Changes in tumor cell response due to prolonged dose delivery times in fractionated radiation therapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  D A Jaffray,et al.  The effects of intra-fraction organ motion on the delivery of dynamic intensity modulation. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Michael C. Joiner,et al.  A simple α/β-independent method to derive fully isoeffective schedules following changes in dose per fraction , 2004 .

[16]  H D Thames,et al.  An 'incomplete-repair' model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. , 1985, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[17]  D. Lea Actions of radiations on living cells. , 1955 .

[18]  Biological equivalence between fractionated radiotherapy treatments using the linear-quadratic model. , 1988, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Re-optimization in adaptive radiotherapy. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Biologic and physical fractionation effects of random geometric errors. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: a note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  H. Rehbinder,et al.  Adaptive radiation therapy for compensation of errors in patient setup and treatment delivery. , 2004, Medical physics.