The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments

This paper provides with a review of the state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (DCEs). The growing body of literature on this field serves to emphasize the increasing role that DCEs are playing in environmental decision making in the last decade. The paper attempts to cover the full process of undertaking a choice experiment, including survey and experimental design, econometric analysis of choice data and welfare analysis. The research on this field is found to be intense, although many challenges are put forward (e.g. choice-task complexity and cognitive effort, experimental design, preference and scale heterogeneity, endogeneity or model uncertainty). Reviewing the state of the art of DCEs serves to draw attention to the main challenges that this methodological approach will need to overcome in the coming years and to identify the frontiers in discrete choice analysis.

[1]  Linda Court Salisbury,et al.  Alleviating the Constant Stochastic Variance Assumption in Decision Research: Theory, Measurement, and Experimental Test , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[2]  E. Biénabe,et al.  Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments , 2006 .

[3]  William S. Breffle,et al.  A Joint Latent-Class Model: Combining Likert-Scale Preference Statements With Choice Data to Harvest Preference Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[4]  I. Bateman,et al.  Choice set awareness and ordering effects in choice experiments , 2008 .

[5]  M. Fosgerau.  Specification testing of discrete choice models: a note on the use of a nonparametric test , 2007 .

[6]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  A practical test for the choice of mixing distribution in discrete choice models , 2005 .

[7]  Phoebe Koundouri,et al.  Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece , 2006 .

[8]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation , 2001 .

[10]  Kalidas Ashok,et al.  Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables , 2002 .

[11]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Choice Environment, Market Complexity, and Consumer Behavior: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach for Incorporating Decision Complexity into Models of Consumer Choice , 2001 .

[12]  J. R. DeShazo,et al.  Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency , 2002 .

[13]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment , 2005 .

[14]  Jennifer J. Tabanico,et al.  Implicit connections with nature , 2004 .

[15]  Jorge E. Araña,et al.  Understanding the use of non-compensatory decision rules in discrete choice experiments: The role of emotions , 2009 .

[16]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[17]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Attitude Research in the 21st Century: The Current State of Knowledge. , 2005 .

[18]  Peter Goos,et al.  A Comparison of Criteria to Design Efficient Choice Experiments , 2006 .

[19]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay , 2010 .

[20]  Bruno Lanz.  Investigating willingness to pay-willingness to accept aysmmetry in choice experiments , 2009 .

[21]  Eija Pouta,et al.  Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey , 2004 .

[22]  Russell Blamey,et al.  Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer , 2002 .

[23]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior , 1999 .

[24]  Brett Day,et al.  Ordering anomalies in choice experiments , 2010 .

[25]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[26]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Customer-Specific Taste Parameters and Mixed Logit: Households' Choice of Electricity Supplier , 2000 .

[27]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[28]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  What You Don’t Know Might Hurt You: Some Unresolved Issues in the Design and Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments , 2006 .

[29]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments , 2005 .

[30]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[31]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .

[32]  J. Perez-Garcia,et al.  Valuing Biodiversity, Aesthetics, and Job Losses Associated with Ecosystem Management Using Stated Preferences , 2003, Forest Science.

[33]  David F. Layton,et al.  Embracing Model Uncertainty: Strategies for Response Pooling and Model Averaging , 2006 .

[34]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[35]  Edward R. Morey,et al.  A Repeated Nested-Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing , 1993 .

[36]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[37]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Effects on Welfare Measures of Alternative Means of Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Recreational Demand Models , 2008 .

[38]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[39]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Adjectives qualifying individuals perceptions impacting on transport mode preferences , 2011 .

[40]  John M. Rose,et al.  Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models , 2009 .

[41]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[42]  Zhishi Wang,et al.  Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao , 2006 .

[43]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms , 2009 .

[44]  K. Train,et al.  On the Similarity of Classical and Bayesian Estimates of Individual Mean Partworths , 2000 .

[45]  Petr Mariel,et al.  The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: some empirical evidence. , 2009 .

[46]  J. Neyman,et al.  Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability , 1963 .

[47]  B. Kanninen,et al.  Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies , 2007 .

[48]  W. Greene,et al.  Recent Progress on Endogeneity in Choice Modeling , 2005 .

[49]  John M. Rose,et al.  Incorporating model uncertainty into the generation of efficient stated choice experiments: A model averaging approach , 2009 .

[50]  Emily Lancsar,et al.  Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future , 2009, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[51]  John M. Rose,et al.  Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models , 2008 .

[52]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[53]  Turalay Kenc,et al.  Ox: An Object-Oriented Matrix Language , 1997 .

[54]  D. Cox.  Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses , 1961 .

[55]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[56]  J. Louviere,et al.  Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[57]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[58]  John M. Rose,et al.  Designing Stated Choice Experiments: State of the Art , 2007 .

[59]  Robert E. Wright,et al.  Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test , 2005 .

[60]  Susana Mourato,et al.  Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope , 2003 .

[61]  F. Johnson,et al.  Sources and Effects of Utility-Theoretic Inconsistency in Stated-Preference Surveys , 2001 .

[62]  B. Kanninen,et al.  Valuing environmental amenities using stated choice studies : a common sense approach to theory and practice , 2010 .

[63]  Denzil G. Fiebig,et al.  The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[64]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs , 1996 .

[65]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Frontiers in Stated Preferences Methods: An Introduction , 2006 .

[66]  J. Swait.  A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data☆ , 1994 .

[67]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[68]  K. Train,et al.  A Control Function Approach to Endogeneity in Consumer Choice Models , 2010 .

[69]  P. Boxall,et al.  Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach , 2002 .

[70]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Behavioral frontiers in choice modeling , 2008 .

[71]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[72]  Rosemary Snelgar,et al.  Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure , 2006 .

[73]  D. Hensher,et al.  Revealing the extent of process heterogeneity in choice analysis , 2009 .

[74]  A. Scott,et al.  Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: An application in health care , 2002 .

[75]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Experimental analysis of choice , 1991 .

[76]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[77]  I H Langford,et al.  Determinants of Individuals' Willingness to Pay for Perceived Reductions in Environmental Health Risks: A Case Study of Bathing Water Quality , 1998 .

[78]  Alejandro Caparrós,et al.  Would You Choose Your Preferred Option? Comparing Choice and Recoded Ranking Experiments , 2007 .

[79]  Sachin Gupta,et al.  Simulated Maximum Likelihood Estimator for the Random Coefficient Logit Model Using Aggregate Data , 2009 .

[80]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions , 2006 .

[81]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models with Logit Kernel: Applicability to Large Scale Models1 , 2005 .

[82]  K. Train.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[83]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Computing Willingness-to-Pay in Random Utility Models , 1996 .

[84]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  Applied Transport Economics: A Management and Policy Perspective , 2012 .

[85]  J. Roosen,et al.  Scope insensitivity in health risk reduction studies: A comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food , 2007 .

[86]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .

[87]  Patricia A. Champ,et al.  Survey Methodologies for Stated-Choice Studies , 2006 .

[88]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .

[89]  W. Hanemann.  Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand , 1984 .

[90]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Joint estimation of process and outcome in choice experiments and implications for willingness to pay , 2008 .

[91]  S. B. Olsen,et al.  An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices , 2007 .

[92]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Several Tests for Model Specication in the Pres-ence of Alternative Hypotheses , 1981 .

[93]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation , 2000 .

[94]  M. Thiene,et al.  Using Flexible Taste Distributions to Value Collective Reputation for Environmentally Friendly Production Methods , 2008 .

[95]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments , 2008 .

[96]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations , 2008 .

[97]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Organic food choices and Protection Motivation Theory: addressing the psychological sources of heterogeneity , 2011 .

[98]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Making Choice Studies Incentive Compatible , 2006 .

[99]  David R. Cox,et al.  Further Results on Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses , 1962 .

[100]  Maya Abou Zeid,et al.  Attitudes and Value of Time Heterogeneity , 2010 .

[101]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[102]  Emily Lancsar,et al.  Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? , 2006, Health economics.

[103]  P. Schultz.  New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .

[104]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[105]  Elisabetta Strazzera,et al.  Modeling Elicitation effects in contingent valuation studies: a Monte Carlo Analysis of the bivariate approach , 2005 .

[106]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[107]  C. Spash.  Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness To Pay for Environmental Improvements , 2006, Land Economics.

[108]  Steven T. Berry,et al.  Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium , 1995 .

[109]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[110]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Benefit Estimates for Landscape Improvements: Sequential Bayesian Design and Respondents’ Rationality in a Choice Experiment , 2005, Land Economics.

[111]  J. Ladenburg,et al.  Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study , 2008 .

[112]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  ESTIMATION OF VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS USING MIXED LOGIT MODELS , 2005 .

[113]  J. Shogren.  Valuation in the Lab , 2006 .

[114]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to derive welfare estimates for the provision of elective surgery: Implications of discontinuous preferences , 2002 .

[115]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[116]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago , 2012 .

[117]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to Pay Space , 2005 .

[118]  N. Hanley,et al.  Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation? , 2002 .

[119]  Clive L. Spash,et al.  Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation , 2000 .

[120]  David F. Layton,et al.  Heterogeneous Preferences Regarding Global Climate Change , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[121]  C. Winston,et al.  Differentiated Road Pricing, Express Lanes and Carpools: Exploiting Heterogeneous Preferences in Policy Design , 2006 .

[122]  P. Zarembka.  Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[123]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[124]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Attribute Processing in Choice Experiments and Implications on Willingness to Pay , 2006 .

[125]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[126]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test , 1973 .

[127]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Bounded Distributions of Correlated Partworths , 2005 .

[128]  C. Winston,et al.  UNCOVERING THE DISTRIBUTION OF MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR TRAVEL TIME AND RELIABILITY : IMPLICATIONS FOR ROAD PRICING , 2002 .

[129]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[130]  K. McConnell,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources , 2002 .