Prognostic and predictive factors for patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing aggressive induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support.

PURPOSE We performed a retrospective review to determine predictive and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer who received induction therapy, and, if they responded to treatment, high-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic breast cancer received induction therapy with doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM). Partial responders then received immediate high-dose chemotherapy, whereas those who achieved complete remission were randomized to immediate or delayed high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell support. We performed a retrospective review of data from these patients and used Cox proportional hazards regression models for analyses. RESULTS The overall response rate for the 425 patients enrolled was 74% (95% confidence interval, 70% to 78%). Multivariate analysis of data from all 425 patients revealed that positive estrogen receptor status (P =.0041), smaller metastatic foci (</= 2 v > 2 cm) (P =. 0165), a longer disease-free interval from initial diagnosis to diagnosis of metastases (</= 2 v > 2 years) (P =.0051), and prior treatment with tamoxifen (P =.0152) were good prognostic signs for overall survival. Patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (P =.0001) and those who developed liver metastases (P =.0001) had decreased long-term survival. In the subgroup of responders to AFM induction, multivariate analysis showed that those with visceral metastases did less well (P =.0006), as did patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (P =.0023). However, those who had received tamoxifen therapy in the adjuvant setting did better (P =. 0143). CONCLUSION The chance for long-term remission with induction therapy with AFM and high-dose chemotherapy is increased for hormone receptor positive-patients with nonvisceral metastases who have not received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and have long disease-free intervals.

[1]  P. Zola,et al.  Prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer patients obtaining objective response or disease stabilization after first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin. Evidence for a positive effect of maintenance hormonal therapy on overall survival. , 1997, Anticancer research.

[2]  J. Armitage,et al.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  P. Wingo,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1997 , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  B A Miller,et al.  Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  L. Seymour,et al.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic rescue as primary treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  D. Fairclough,et al.  Prognostic factors for prolonged progression-free survival with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support for advanced breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Factors predicting long‐term survival for metastatic breast cancer patients treated with high‐dose chemotherapy and bone marrow support , 1994, Cancer.

[9]  G. Rosner,et al.  High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow support as consolidation after standard-dose adjuvant therapy for high-risk primary breast cancer. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Marks,et al.  Maintenance of p53 alterations throughout breast cancer progression. , 1991, Cancer research.

[11]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .