To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research

[1]  F. Sardanelli.  Trends in radiology and experimental research , 2017, European Radiology Experimental.

[2]  X. Golay.  The long and winding road to translation for imaging biomarker development: the case for arterial spin labelling (ASL) , 2017, European Radiology Experimental.

[3]  Mercè Crosas,et al.  Data Authorship as an Incentive to Data Sharing. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Gillen,et al.  Attitudes toward Potential Participant Registries. , 2017, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[5]  Fiona Godlee,et al.  [Data sharing statements for clinical trials: a requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors]. , 2017, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[6]  Xingshun Qi,et al.  Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview , 2016, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[7]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Sharing Data from Cardiovascular Clinical Trials--A Proposal. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  The Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project--A Mechanism for Data Sharing. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Ying Chen,et al.  IBM Watson: How Cognitive Computing Can Be Applied to Big Data Challenges in Life Sciences Research. , 2016, Clinical therapeutics.

[10]  Kevin A. Archie,et al.  XNAT Central: Open sourcing imaging research data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[11]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[12]  Fabian Prasser,et al.  A Generic Method for Assessing the Quality of De-Identified Health Data , 2016, MIE.

[13]  L. Irwig,et al.  Agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and comparison with alternative tests: individual patient data meta-analysis , 2015, BMC Cancer.

[14]  E. R. van den Heuvel,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M. Rowbotham,et al.  Effect of variability in the 7-day baseline pain diary on the assay sensitivity of neuropathic pain randomized clinical trials: An ACTTION study , 2014, PAIN®.

[16]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[17]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent , 2014, Book of Anonymity.

[18]  Ignacio Ferreira-González,et al.  Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials. , 2014, JAMA.

[19]  Frank W. Rockhold,et al.  Bumps and bridges on the road to responsible sharing of clinical trial data , 2014, Clinical trials.

[20]  F. Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.

[21]  Elliott Antman,et al.  Data sharing in research: benefits and risks for clinicians , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Mark Barnes,et al.  Preparing for responsible sharing of clinical trial data. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Participant-level data and the new frontier in trial transparency. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  E. Loder.  Sharing data from clinical trials: where we are and what lies ahead , 2013, BMJ.

[25]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[26]  F. Sardanelli,et al.  Radiological journals in the online world: should we think Open? , 2013, European Radiology.

[27]  Iain Hrynaszkiewicz,et al.  Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Marco Capocasa,et al.  Mine, Yours, Ours? Sharing Data on Human Genetic Variation , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  H. Palevsky,et al.  Validation of 6-Minute Walk Distance as a Surrogate End Point in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Trials , 2012, Circulation.

[30]  Cary P Gross,et al.  The importance of clinical trial data sharing: toward more open science. , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[31]  C. Spradley.  Race and Sex Differences in Response to Endothelin Receptor Antagonists for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension , 2012 .

[32]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Why we need easy access to all data from all clinical trials and how to accomplish it , 2011, Trials.

[33]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  A model for dissemination and independent analysis of industry data. , 2011, JAMA.

[34]  M. Walport,et al.  Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data , 2011, The Lancet.

[35]  Mark Walport,et al.  Sharing research data to improve public health , 2011, The Lancet.

[36]  Richard C. Pais,et al.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. , 2011, Medical physics.

[37]  A. Merry,et al.  Data sharing for pharmacokinetic studies , 2009, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[38]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Incorporating collaboratory concepts into informatics in support of translational interdisciplinary biomedical research , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[39]  L. Stewart,et al.  Meta-analyses using individual patient data. , 1997, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.