Tumor–antigen heterogeneity of disseminated breast cancer cells: Implications for immunotherapy of minimal residual disease

Single micrometastatic tumor cells encased in mesenchymal tissues, such as bone marrow (BM), are regarded as suitable targets for adjuvant immunotherapy since they are easily accessible for both immunoglobulins and immune effector cells. However, the antigen profile of such cells, to which antibody therapy might be targeted, cannot be deduced from the antigen pattern of the primary tumor. To evaluate the antigen profile of disseminated cells found in BM aspirates from 20 breast cancer patients, we applied a quantitative immuno‐cytochemical double‐marker assay and typed for 4 common tumor‐associated cell‐surface antigens (c‐erbB‐2, CO17–1A, MUC‐1, LewisY). Individual breast cancer cells were identified by Fab fragments of the pan‐cytokeratin (CK) monoclonal antibody (MAb) A45‐B/B3, directly conjugated with alkaline phosphatase, which identified cancer cells as sensitively as the standard APAAP procedure (r = 0.998; p < 0.0001). CK+ cells co‐expressed c‐erbB‐2, CO17–1A, MUC‐1 and LewisY in 87%, 78%, 79% and 79% of patients, respectively; however, the frequency of double‐positive cells per sample varied considerably. The mean percentage of double‐positive cells per total number of CK+ cells was 41% for c‐erbB‐2 (range 0–92%), 47% for CO17–1A (range 0–75%), 49% for MUC‐1 (range 0–67%) and 32% for LewisY (range 0–59%). In 14 of these patients, we used an antibody cocktail to type CK+ cells for the combined expression of all 4 antigens. The antibody cocktail labeled significantly more CK+ cells than each of the single MAbs alone, resulting in a mean of 71% double‐positive tumor cells (34–100%). We conclude that expression of tumor‐associated cell‐surface antigens on micrometastatic cancer cells in BM is heterogeneous, which may limit the efficacy of monovalent immunotherapeutic strategies directed against only one particular antigen. Thus, defining target antigens expressed by the actual target cells emerges as a crucial first step in selecting appropriate therapeutic targets. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 84:1–5, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  W. J. Harrison The total cellularity of the bone marrow in man , 1962, Journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  H Stein,et al.  Immunoenzymatic labeling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes). , 1984, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[3]  J. Taylor‐Papadimitriou,et al.  MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES TO EPITHELIAL MEMBRANE ANTIGEN AND HUMAN MILK FAT GLOBULE MUCIN DEFINE EPITOPES EXPRESSED ON OTHER MOLECULES , 1985, The Lancet.

[4]  G. Riethmüller,et al.  The epithelial cell surface antigen 17–1A, a target for antibody‐mediated tumor therapy: Its biochemical nature, tissue distribution and recognition by different monoclonal antibodies , 1986, International journal of cancer.

[5]  S. Gay,et al.  Immunolocalization of Gla proteins (osteocalcin) in rat tooth germs: comparison between indirect immunofluorescence, peroxidase-antiperoxidase, avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex, and avidin-biotin-gold complex with silver enhancement. , 1987, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[6]  W. Renmans,et al.  Sensitive detection of immunogold-silver staining with darkfield and epi-polarization microscopy. , 1988, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[7]  F. Momburg,et al.  Regulation and Functional Role of MHC Expression on Tumors , 1989 .

[8]  W Godolphin,et al.  Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. , 1989, Science.

[9]  L. Ries,et al.  Leukemia following chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 1990, Cancer research.

[10]  D. Slamon Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast cancer. , 1990, Cancer investigation.

[11]  R K Jain,et al.  Physiological barriers to delivery of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors. , 1990, Cancer research.

[12]  K. Pantel,et al.  Frequent down-regulation of major histocompatibility class I antigen expression on individual micrometastatic carcinoma cells. , 1991, Cancer research.

[13]  K. Pantel,et al.  Micrometastatic tumour cells in bone marrow of patients with gastric cancer: methodological aspects of detection and prognostic significance. , 1991, European journal of cancer.

[14]  G. Riethmüller,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies in the detection and therapy of micrometastatic epithelial cancers , 1992, Current Biology.

[15]  G. Riethmüller,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies in the detection and therapy of micrometastatic epithelial cancers. , 1992 .

[16]  J. Izbicki,et al.  Differential expression of proliferation-associated molecules in individual micrometastatic carcinoma cells. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  J. Izbicki,et al.  Methodological analysis of immunocytochemical screening for disseminated epithelial tumor cells in bone marrow. , 1994, Journal of hematotherapy.

[18]  R. Dillman,et al.  Antibodies as cytotoxic therapy. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  G. Riethmüller,et al.  Randomised trial of monoclonal antibody for adjuvant therapy of resected Dukes' C colorectal carcinoma , 1994, The Lancet.

[20]  I. Fidler,et al.  Modulation of the organ microenvironment for treatment of cancer metastasis. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  H. Allgayer,et al.  Individual development and uPA–receptor expression of disseminated tumour cells in bone marrow: A reference to early systemic disease in solid cancer , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[22]  S. Braun,et al.  Biological characteristics of micrometastatic carcinoma cells in bone marrow. , 1996, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[23]  D Tripathy,et al.  Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  F. Schildberg,et al.  Comparative analyses of bone marrow micrometastases in breast and gastric cancer , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[25]  R. Holle,et al.  Micrometastatic breast cancer cells in bone marrow at primary surgery: prognostic value in comparison with nodal status. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  G. Hansson,et al.  Distinct sub‐populations of carcinoma‐associated MUC1 mucins as detected by the monoclonal antibody 9H8 and antibodies against the sialyl‐Lewis a and sialyl‐Lewis x epitopes in the circulation of breast‐cancer patients , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[27]  A. Scott,et al.  Antibody-based immunological therapies. , 1997, Current opinion in immunology.

[28]  H. Allgayer,et al.  Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R): one potential characteristic of metastatic phenotypes in minimal residual tumor disease. , 1997, Cancer research.

[29]  B. Naume,et al.  Immunomagnetic techniques for the enrichment and detection of isolated breast carcinoma cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. , 1997, Journal of hematotherapy.

[30]  S. Braun,et al.  Re: Micrometastatic breast cancer cells in bone marrow at primary surgery: prognostic value in comparison with nodal status. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  A. van Dalen,et al.  Epitope Specificity of 30 Monoclonal Antibodies against Cytokeratin Antigens: The ISOBM TD5-1 Workshop , 1998, Tumor Biology.

[32]  V. Reuter,et al.  Expression of potential target antigens for immunotherapy on primary and metastatic prostate cancers. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.