PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development

This paper compares two models for reforming engineering education, problem/project-based learning (PBL), and conceive–design–implement–operate (CDIO), identifying and explaining similarities and differences. PBL and CDIO are defined and contrasted in terms of their history, community, definitions, curriculum design, relation to disciplines, engineering projects, and change strategy. The structured comparison is intended as an introduction for learning about any of these models. It also invites reflection to support the understanding and evolution of PBL and CDIO, and indicates specifically what the communities can learn from each other. It is noted that while the two approaches share many underlying values, they only partially overlap as strategies for educational reform. The conclusions are that practitioners have much to learn from each other's experiences through a dialogue between the communities, and that PBL and CDIO can play compatible and mutually reinforcing roles, and thus can be fruitfully combined to reform engineering education.

[1]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  REFLECTIONS ON PROJECT WORK AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING , 1996 .

[2]  Roger Hadgraft,et al.  Engineering Education and the Development of Expertise , 2011 .

[3]  Narayanan Komerath,et al.  Boeing-University Relations - A Review and Prospects for the Future , 2005 .

[4]  Dorothy H. Evensen,et al.  Factors Affecting Small-Group Tutorial Learning: A Review of Research , 2000 .

[5]  Kristina Edström,et al.  The Application of CDIO Standards in the Evaluation of Swedish Engineering Degree Programmes , 2006 .

[6]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  INTEGRATION OF A COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS EDUCATION IN THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM , 2011 .

[7]  Sheri Sheppard,et al.  Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Book Highlights. , 2008 .

[8]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Curriculum design based on the CDIO model , 2005 .

[9]  Maggi Savin-Baden,et al.  Facilitating problem-based learning: illuminating perspectives , 2003 .

[10]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Integrated assessment of diciplinary and interpersonal skills - student perceptions of a novel learning experience , 2005 .

[11]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Rethinking engineering education - The CDIO approach, 2nd ed , 2014 .

[12]  Kristina Edström,et al.  The Route Towards a Sustainable Design-Implement Course , 2007 .

[13]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Integration of education for sustainable development in a mechanical engineering programme , 2012 .

[14]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Engaging stakeholders in defining education for innovation in Russia : consensus and tensions , 2013 .

[15]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  All Problems are not Equal: Implications for Problem-Based Learning , 2008 .

[16]  Knud Illeris,et al.  How We Learn: Learning and Non-Learning in School and Beyond , 2007 .

[17]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning , 2003 .

[18]  H. Barrows.  Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview , 1996 .

[19]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Engineering and Communication Integrated Learning – Collaboration Strategies for Skills and Subject Experts , 2010 .

[20]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[21]  Jean Michel,et al.  Management of Change-Implementation of Problem-based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering , 2009 .

[22]  Peter Munkebo Hussmann,et al.  Peer Evaluation of Master Programs: Closing the Quality Circle of the CDIO Approach? , 2012, Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ..

[23]  E. Fairbrother.  What is an engineer , 1971 .

[24]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  The CDIO Syllabus v2.0. An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education , 2011 .

[25]  Allison Brown,et al.  Educating Engineers for the 21st Century , 2004 .

[26]  E. Graaff,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning * , 2022 .

[27]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Student feedback in engineering: a discipline-specific overview and background , 2012 .

[28]  John W. Thomas,et al.  A REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON PROJECT-BASED LEARNING , 2000 .

[29]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Rethinking Engineering Education - The CDIO Approach , 2007 .

[30]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  A Comparison of the CDIO and EUR-ACE Quality Assurance Systems , 2012, Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ..

[31]  Eva Fors,et al.  LIKA - Digital literacy in Teacher Education , 2007 .

[32]  E. Crawley,et al.  Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successful change , 2012 .

[33]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education , 2014 .

[34]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[35]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  International Collaboration in the Reform of Engineering Education , 2002 .

[36]  Jakob Kuttenkeuler,et al.  Mini workshop - Designing project-based courses for learning and cost-effective teaching , 2011, FIE.

[37]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Using Integrated Programme Descriptions to Support a CDIO Programme Design Process , 2006 .

[38]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  All Problems are Not Equal: Implications for PBL , 2008 .

[39]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Diversity of PBL – PBL Learning Principles and Models , 2009 .

[40]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Implementing Engineering Education for Environmental Sustainability into CDIO Programs , 2008 .

[41]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Identifying Opportunities for Collaborations in International Engineering Education Research on Problem- and Project-based Learning , 2010 .

[42]  R Boissoneau.  Peer evaluation. , 1980, Hospital & health services administration.

[43]  Denise Chalmers,et al.  Review of Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Society for research into Higher Education , 2012 .

[44]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  COMPARING TWO APPROACHES FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT: PBL AND CDIO , 2012 .

[45]  G. Boulton‐Lewis.  Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[46]  Nicholas Basta,et al.  What Is an Engineer , 1985 .

[47]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[48]  Claire Howell Major,et al.  Foundations of Problem Based Learning , 2004 .

[49]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Should we do CDIO or PBL? Yes! , 2011 .

[50]  G. Norman,et al.  PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: three iterations in three decades. , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[51]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  EXPERIENCES FROM USING INTEGRATED PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS TO SUPPORT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT , 2007 .

[52]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[53]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field , 2010 .

[54]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  The CDIO syllabus: a comparative study of expected student proficiency , 2003 .

[55]  Juha Kontio,et al.  Improving Quality Assurance with CDIO Self-Evaluation: Experiences From a Nordic Project , 2012, Int. J. Qual. Assur. Eng. Technol. Educ..