Age-Related Changes in Predictive Capacity Versus Internal Model Adaptability: Electrophysiological Evidence that Individual Differences Outweigh Effects of Age

Hierarchical predictive coding has been identified as a possible unifying principle of brain function, and recent work in cognitive neuroscience has examined how it may be affected by age–related changes. Using language comprehension as a test case, the present study aimed to dissociate age-related changes in prediction generation versus internal model adaptation following a prediction error. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were measured in a group of older adults (60–81 years; n = 40) as they read sentences of the form “The opposite of black is white/yellow/nice.” Replicating previous work in young adults, results showed a target-related P300 for the expected antonym (“white”; an effect assumed to reflect a prediction match), and a graded N400 effect for the two incongruous conditions (i.e. a larger N400 amplitude for the incongruous continuation not related to the expected antonym, “nice,” versus the incongruous associated condition, “yellow”). These effects were followed by a late positivity, again with a larger amplitude in the incongruous non-associated versus incongruous associated condition. Analyses using linear mixed-effects models showed that the target-related P300 effect and the N400 effect for the incongruous non-associated condition were both modulated by age, thus suggesting that age-related changes affect both prediction generation and model adaptation. However, effects of age were outweighed by the interindividual variability of ERP responses, as reflected in the high proportion of variance captured by the inclusion of by-condition random slopes for participants and items. We thus argue that – at both a neurophysiological and a functional level – the notion of general differences between language processing in young and older adults may only be of limited use, and that future research should seek to better understand the causes of interindividual variability in the ERP responses of older adults and its relation to cognitive performance.

[1]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[2]  T W Picton,et al.  The effects of age on human event-related potentials. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[3]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[4]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[6]  G. Dede Sentence Comprehension in Older Adults: Evidence for Risky Processing Strategies , 2014, Experimental aging research.

[7]  A. Friederici,et al.  The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture , 2008 .

[8]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  S. Kemper,et al.  Longitudinal change in language production: effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[10]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Peak individual alpha frequency qualifies as a stable neurophysiological trait marker in healthy younger and older adults. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[11]  Meredith A. Shafto,et al.  Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation , 2014, Science.

[12]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectation and semantic integration during the processing of collocations , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[13]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Denise C. Park,et al.  The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Parsimonious Mixed Models , 2015, 1506.04967.

[16]  J. Fox,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models , 2008 .

[17]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  U. Lindenberger Human cognitive aging: Corriger la fortune? , 2014, Science.

[19]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Individual alpha peak frequency is related to latent factors of general cognitive abilities , 2013, NeuroImage.

[20]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[23]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[24]  Cindy Lustig,et al.  Brain aging: reorganizing discoveries about the aging mind , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Aging Gracefully: Compensatory Brain Activity in High-Performing Older Adults , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[28]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  The Brain Ages Optimally to Model Its Environment: Evidence from Sensory Learning over the Adult Lifespan , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[31]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[32]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: an ERP study. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[33]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[34]  John Fox,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models , 2008 .

[35]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  Predictive Mechanisms in Idiom Comprehension , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension , 2010, Brain and Language.

[37]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[38]  C. Fiebach,et al.  "Capacity" reconsidered: interindividual differences in language comprehension and individual alpha frequency. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[39]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading , 2012, Brain and Language.