Tax incentives and green innovation—The mediating role of financing constraints and the moderating role of subsidies

Government intervention is increasingly vital due to the dual externalities of green innovation. We explored the relationship between tax incentives, subsidies, and green innovation. Based on data from Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2019, we developed an evaluation system for corporate green innovation. First, we find that tax incentives promote corporate green innovation, while subsidies have little effect on green innovation. Second, we find that financing constraints are the main path of influence of tax incentives. Also, subsidies reverse the positive impact of tax incentives. Third, we further explore the heterogeneity of firms. We find that tax incentives and subsidies only impact green innovation by state-owned enterprises, monopolies, and small and medium-sized enterprises. We hope to provide new theoretical insights into intervention policy improvements and corporate green innovation in developing countries such as China.

[1]  C. Zhuo,et al.  Green Credit Policy, Institution Supply and Enterprise Green Innovation , 2022, Journal of Economic Analysis.

[2]  Ming-lei Zhu,et al.  The Impact of Social Capital on Land Arrangement Behavior of Migrant Workers in China , 2022, Journal of Economic Analysis.

[3]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Do tax reductions stimulate firm productivity? A quasi-natural experiment from China , 2022, Economic Systems.

[4]  Julien Chevallier,et al.  Emission trading, induced innovation and firm performance , 2022, Energy Economics.

[5]  S. Law,et al.  Effect of financial development and technological innovation on green growth—Analysis based on spatial Durbin model , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  Hongsheng Fang,et al.  Tax Incentive and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from a Tax Revenue Sharing Reform in China , 2022, Journal of Asian Economics.

[7]  Haitao Wu,et al.  Does the legacy of state planning put pressure on ecological efficiency? Evidence from China , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[8]  Pengyu Chen Subsidized or Not, the Impact of Firm Internationalization on Green Innovation—Based on a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[9]  Wenjun Zhou,et al.  Research on the Impact of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Enterprises’ Green Innovation—Based on the Perspective of Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions , 2022, Sustainability.

[10]  Huayun Zhai,et al.  Does digital transformation enhance a firm's performance? Evidence from China , 2021, Technology in Society.

[11]  Y. Hao,et al.  The inducing factors of environmental emergencies: Do environmental decentralization and regional corruption matter? , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Junbing Xu,et al.  Crowding in or crowding out? How local government debt influences corporate innovation for China , 2021, PloS one.

[13]  Haitao Wu,et al.  The role of information and communication technology on green total factor energy efficiency: Does environmental regulation work? , 2021, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[14]  Y. Hao,et al.  Government corruption, market segmentation and renewable energy technology innovation: Evidence from China. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  Dayong Zhang,et al.  Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China , 2021 .

[16]  Ya-Chung Sun,et al.  Can we-media information disclosure drive listed companies' innovation?—From the perspective of financing constraints , 2021 .

[17]  S. Law,et al.  Impact of financial development and technological innovation on the volatility of green growth—evidence from China , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[18]  Y. Hao,et al.  Does Internet Development Improve Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency? Evidence from China , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  P. Failler,et al.  Impacts of the financialization of manufacturing enterprises on total factor productivity: empirical examination from China's listed companies , 2021 .

[20]  Guang Shen,et al.  Does tax deduction relax financing constraints? Evidence from China's value-added tax reform , 2021, China Economic Review.

[21]  J. Miguel-Dávila,et al.  External stakeholder engagement: Complementary and substitutive effects on firms' eco‐innovation , 2021, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[22]  Lu Qiu,et al.  Sustaining the sustainable development: How do firms turn government green subsidies into financial performance through green innovation? , 2021 .

[23]  Xuan Feng The role of ESG in acquirers' performance change after M&A deals , 2021, Green Finance.

[24]  Junru Zhang,et al.  Research on the impact of finance on promoting technological innovation based on the state-space model , 2021, Green Finance.

[25]  Xiongfeng Pan,et al.  P2P supply chain financing, R&D investment and companies' innovation efficiency , 2021, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Christoph H. Glock,et al.  Tax or subsidy? Design and selection of regulatory policies for remanufacturing , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  M. Song,et al.  Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation? , 2020 .

[28]  Mohamad Nur Utomo,et al.  Environmental performance, environmental disclosure, and firm value: empirical study of non-financial companies at Indonesia Stock Exchange , 2020 .

[29]  M. Yi,et al.  Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental Regulations, and Their Effect on Green Innovation Efficiency of Manufacturing Industry: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[30]  Weimin Ma,et al.  What Drives Green Innovation? A Game Theoretic Analysis of Government Subsidy and Cooperation Contract , 2019, Sustainability.

[31]  Hamid Sakaki,et al.  Institutional investors' ownership stability and firms' innovation , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[32]  Yufei Xia,et al.  Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: The threshold effect , 2019, Energy Policy.

[33]  Hongjun Cao,et al.  The driving effect of internal and external environment on green innovation strategy-The moderating role of top management’s environmental awareness , 2019, Nankai Business Review International.

[34]  Darko Marjanović Competitiveness of the Serbian Economy Through the Prism of Tax Incentives for Foreign Investors , 2018, Economic Analysis.

[35]  A. Adegboye,et al.  Does Access to Finance Enhance SME Innovation and Productivity in Nigeria? Evidence from the World Bank Enterprise Survey , 2018, African Development Review.

[36]  C. Rammer,et al.  How different policy instruments affect green product innovation : A differentiated perspective , 2018 .

[37]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Effect of Government Subsidy on Non-Technological Innovation and Firm Performance in the Service Sector: Evidence from Germany , 2018 .

[38]  Declan Jordan,et al.  Does more competition increase business-level innovation? Evidence from domestically focused firms in emerging economies , 2017 .

[39]  Li Yang,et al.  Ecological-economic efficiency evaluation of green technology innovation in strategic emerging industries based on entropy weighted TOPSIS method , 2017 .

[40]  R. M. Dangelico Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going , 2016 .

[41]  P. Boeing The allocation and effectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies - Evidence from listed firms , 2016 .

[42]  A. Trianni,et al.  Barriers, drivers and decision-making process for industrial energy efficiency: A broad study among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises , 2016 .

[43]  Chaoqing Yuan,et al.  An analysis on investment policy effect of China’s photovoltaic industry based on feedback model , 2014 .

[44]  Ester Martínez-Ros,et al.  Tax incentives… or subsidies for business R&D? , 2014 .

[45]  J. Block,et al.  R&D Investments in Family and Founder Firms: An Agency Perspective , 2012 .

[46]  G. Licht,et al.  What the design of an R&D tax incentive tells about its effectiveness: a simulation of R&D tax incentives in the European Union , 2011 .

[47]  Oliviero A. Carboni R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures: evidence from Italian manufacturing data , 2011 .

[48]  Mário Raposo,et al.  Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve , 2011 .

[49]  Charles J. Hadlock,et al.  New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index , 2009 .

[50]  Denis Fred Simon,et al.  China's Emerging Technological Edge: Assessing the Role of High-End Talent , 2009 .

[51]  Xulia González,et al.  Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? , 2008 .

[52]  Nicolas Poussing,et al.  Internet Use and Social Capital: The Strength of Virtual Ties , 2010 .

[53]  Yonghong Wu The effects of state R&D tax credits in stimulating private R&D expenditure: A cross-state empirical analysis , 2005 .

[54]  Barry R. Weingast,et al.  Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style , 2005 .

[55]  Petr Hanel,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of R&D Tax Credits on Innovation: A Microeconometric Study on Canadian Firms , 2011 .

[56]  Michael Waldman Durable Goods Theory for Real World Markets , 2003 .

[57]  D. Soskice German technology policy, innovation, and national institutional frameworks , 1997 .

[58]  Daniel Sandler,et al.  Tax Incentives for R&D , 1995 .

[59]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[60]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[61]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[62]  R. Solow A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .