Analysis of Reproducing Real‐World Appearance on Displays of Varying Dynamic Range

We conduct a series of experiments to investigate the desired properties of a tone mapping operator (TMO) and to design such an operator based on subjective data. We propose a novel approach to the tone mapping problem, in which the tone mapping parameters are determined based on the data from subjective experiments, rather than an image processing algorithm or a visual model. To collect this data, a series of experiments are conducted in which the subjects adjust three generic TMO parameters: brightness, contrast and color saturation. In two experiments, the subjects are to find a) the most preferred image without a reference image (preference task) and b) the closest image to the real‐world scene which the subjects are confronted with (fidelity task). We analyze subjects’ choice of parameters to provide more intuitive control over the parameters of a tone mapping operator. Unlike most of the researched TMOs that focus on rendering for standard low dynamic range monitors, we consider a broad range of potential displays, each offering different dynamic range and brightness. We simulate capabilities of such displays on a high dynamic range (HDR) display. This allows us to address the question of how tone mapping needs to be adjusted to accommodate displays with drastically different dynamic ranges.

[1]  H. Seidel,et al.  Perceptual Evaluation of Tone Mapping Operators with Regard to Similarity and Preference , 2002 .

[2]  de H Huib Ridder Naturalness and image quality : saturation and lightness variation in color images of natural scenes , 1996 .

[3]  Alan Chalmers,et al.  Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a High Dynamic Range display , 2005, SIGGRAPH 2005.

[4]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  Xuemei Zhang,et al.  Perceptual image quality: Effects of tone characteristics , 2005, J. Electronic Imaging.

[6]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  An anchoring theory of lightness perception. , 1999 .

[7]  Robert L. Stevenson,et al.  Dynamic range improvement through multiple exposures , 1999, Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348).

[8]  Greg Ward,et al.  High dynamic range imaging , 2001, SIGGRAPH '04.

[9]  Wolfgang Heidrich,et al.  High dynamic range display systems , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[10]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high-dynamic-range images , 2002 .

[11]  Zia-ur Rahman,et al.  Statistics of visual representation , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Photographic Tone Reproduction , 2002, J. Graphics, GPU, & Game Tools.

[13]  H. Ridder,et al.  Chroma variations and perceived quality of color images of natural scenes , 1997 .

[14]  Greg Turk,et al.  Three methods of detail-preserving contrast reduction for displayed images , 1999 .

[15]  Dani Lischinski,et al.  Gradient Domain High Dynamic Range Compression , 2023 .

[16]  Andreas E. Savakis,et al.  Evaluation of image appeal in consumer photography , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[17]  Alan Chalmers,et al.  Evaluation of tone mapping operators using a High Dynamic Range display , 2005, ACM Trans. Graph..

[18]  Garrett M. Johnson Cares and concerns of CIE TC8-08: spatial appearance modeling and HDR rendering , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of tone mapping operators with real-world scenes , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[20]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1 Dynamic Range Reduction Inspired by Photoreceptor Physiology , 2022 .

[21]  Erik Reinhard,et al.  Photographic tone reproduction for digital images , 2002, ACM Trans. Graph..

[22]  Karol Myszkowski,et al.  Adaptive Logarithmic Mapping For Displaying High Contrast Scenes , 2003, Comput. Graph. Forum.