Effects of gait training using a robotic constraint (Lokomat®) on gait kinematics and kinetics in chronic stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of a 20-min gait training session using the Lokomat® combined with a negative kinematic constraint on the non-paretic limb and a positive kinematic constraint on the paretic limb, on peak knee flexion and other biomechanical parameters in chronic hemiparetic subjects. DESIGN Preliminary study, before-after design. SUBJECTS Fifteen hemiparetic subjects. METHODS Subjects were evaluated using 3-dimensional gait analysis before, immediately after the end of the training, and after a 20-min rest period. The positive constraint increased the range of motion of the paretic limb (hip and knee), while the negative constraint reduced the range of motion of the non-paretic limb (hip and knee). RESULTS Peak knee flexion and other, kinematic, kinetic and spatiotemporal, parameters were significantly improved following the training session. These positive effects occurred predominantly in the paretic limb. Moreover, there was no worsening of biomechanical parameters of the non-paretic limb despite the use of negative constraint on this limb. These effects persisted for at least 20 min following the end of the gait training session. CONCLUSION This type of training may be effective to improve gait in hemiparetic patients. A larger investigation of the training programme is justified.

[1]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Effects of loading the unaffected limb for one session of locomotor training on laboratory measures of gait in stroke. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  M. Levin,et al.  Effect of Trunk Restraint on the Recovery of Reaching Movements in Hemiparetic Patients , 2001, Stroke.

[3]  Kelly P Westlake,et al.  Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Kinematic trajectories while walking within the Lokomat robotic gait-orthosis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Elizabeth A. Brackbill,et al.  Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  J. Fung,et al.  Faster Is Better: Implications for Speed-Intensive Gait Training After Stroke , 2004, Stroke.

[7]  A Villringer,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Ina M. Tarkka,et al.  How much exercise does the enhanced gait-oriented physiotherapy provide for chronic stroke patients? , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[9]  V. L. Nickel,et al.  Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  B. Dobkin.  Neurobiology of Rehabilitation , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  H Hummelsheim,et al.  Rationales for improving motor function. , 1999, Current opinion in neurology.

[12]  R. Tallis,et al.  Conventional physiotherapy and treadmill re-training for higher-level gait disorders in cerebrovascular disease. , 2000, Age and ageing.

[13]  J. Pélissier,et al.  Évaluation clinique de la marche de l'hémiplégique vasculaire : proposition d'une modification de la functional ambulation classification , 1998 .

[14]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Gait performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: selected variables. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  M. Molinari,et al.  Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[18]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .

[19]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[20]  S. Delp,et al.  Capacity to increase walking speed is limited by impaired hip and ankle power generation in lower functioning persons post-stroke. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[21]  J. Carr,et al.  Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance , 2003 .

[22]  A. Mayr,et al.  Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Does the Organization of Postacute Stroke Care Really Matter? , 2001, Stroke.

[24]  I. Schwartz,et al.  The Effectiveness of Locomotor Therapy Using Robotic‐Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[25]  G. Morone,et al.  Who May Benefit From Robotic-Assisted Gait Training? , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  L. Moja,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[27]  B. Nigg,et al.  Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. , 1987, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[28]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[29]  S. Olney,et al.  Temporal, kinematic, and kinetic variables related to gait speed in subjects with hemiplegia: a regression approach. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[30]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[31]  D A Winter,et al.  Measurement and reduction of noise in kinematics of locomotion. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  I. Tarkka,et al.  The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. , 1989, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[34]  M. Klässbo,et al.  Effects of lower limb intensive mass practice in poststroke patients: single-subject experimental design with long-term follow-up , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.