Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy—Influence of Graft Diameter on Endothelial Cell Loss

Purpose: To evaluate the potential influence of graft diameter on endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Methods: A retrospective interventional case series of eyes treated with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (n = 695) with at least 1-year follow-up at Price Vision Group (Indianapolis, IN) was analyzed, excluding eyes with prior glaucoma surgery. Graft diameters ranged from 7.5 to 9.5 mm, with 8.5- and 9-mm grafts accounting for the majority. Endothelial cell loss was assessed as a function of graft diameter by analysis of variance. Results: Mean baseline donor endothelial cell density was 3039 cells per mm2 for 8.5-mm grafts (n = 225) and 3026 cells per mm2 for 9-mm grafts (n = 409). Mean endothelial cell density and postoperative endothelial cell loss at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 2070 (32%), 1999 (34%), 1920 (37%), 1865 (39%), and 1617 (47%) cells per mm2 for 8.5-mm grafts versus 2098 (30%), 2019 (33%), 1857 (38%), 1854 (38%), and 1619 (46%) cells per mm2 for 9.0-mm grafts, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant at any time point. The rates of graft dislocation and immunologic rejection episode were comparable for 8.5-mm and 9.0-mm grafts (both P > 0.05). Conclusions: A larger graft diameter (9 mm) theoretically provides a larger reservoir of healthy endothelial cells but did not result in significantly less cell loss than a smaller diameter (8.5 mm) in eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy during the 5-year follow-up.

[1]  M. Terry,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty: the relationship between donor tissue size and donor endothelial survival. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[2]  David A. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[3]  S. Debanne,et al.  Effect of Incision Width on Graft Survival and Endothelial Cell Loss After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2010, Cornea.

[4]  S. Debanne,et al.  Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Lombardo,et al.  Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure , 2010, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[6]  M. Kim,et al.  Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss after Penetrating Keratoplasty in Relation to Preoperative Recipient Endothelial Cell Density , 2009, Ophthalmologica.

[7]  Terry Kim,et al.  Refractive Change After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery and Its Correlation With Graft Thickness and Diameter , 2009, Cornea.

[8]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: The Influence of Insertion Techniques and Incision Size on Donor Endothelial Survival , 2009, Cornea.

[9]  F. Price,et al.  Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs surgeon-dissected grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Descemet-stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK): Effect of Nontoxic Gentian Violet Marking Pen on DSAEK Donor Tissue Viability by Using Vital Dye Assay , 2008, Cornea.

[11]  Y. Chan,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[12]  F. Price,et al.  Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[13]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Donor age and corneal endothelial cell loss 5 years after successful corneal transplantation. Specular microscopy ancillary study results. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[14]  M. Terry,et al.  Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[15]  S. Dean,et al.  Pull-through technique for graft insertion in DSAEK. , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  D. Coster,et al.  The Australian Corneal Graft Registry 2012 Report , 2012 .

[17]  J. Mehta,et al.  Glide insertion technique for donor cornea lenticule during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  J. McLaren,et al.  Comparison of Corneal Endothelial Cell Images From a Noncontact Specular Microscope and a Scanning Confocal Microscope , 2005, Cornea.

[20]  B. Seitz,et al.  Predictive donor factors for chronic endothelial cell loss after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty in a regression model , 2003, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[21]  Robert W. Thompson,et al.  Risk factors for various causes of failure in initial corneal grafts. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  H. Edelhauser,et al.  Increased endothelial cell density in the paracentral and peripheral regions of the human cornea. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  F. Price,et al.  Risk factors for corneal graft failure. , 1996, Journal of refractive surgery.

[24]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[25]  W. J. Hadden,et al.  A Comparison of , 1971 .