Numerical model of a steam superheater with a complex shape of the tube cross section using Control Volume based Finite Element Method

Abstract In modern utility boilers, characterized by high values of steam pressure and temperature, the individual superheater stages and also the individual passes are made of different low alloy steel grades. The use of tubes having a complex shape of cross section allows the building of the platen with smooth side surfaces, which are arranged in the upper part of the combustion chamber. This avoids the erosion of the superheater tubes and deposition of slag and ash in the spaces between adjacent tubes. The superheaters of this type are widely used in CFB boilers. To select the appropriate steel for each pass and each stage, the maximum wall temperature of tube need to be determined. Steam and tube wall temperature were computed in the superheater using a method proposed in the paper and compared with the results obtained by CFD simulation using Star-CCM+ software. The method presented in the paper can be easily applied to the modeling of flow and thermal processes in superheaters with complicated flow arrangements which usually are found in steam boilers. The advantage of the proposed method is a short computing time in comparison with detailed and complex 3D models. Using the methodology developed in the article, time needed to obtain final results at steady-state conditions can be lower even dozen times in comparison to CFD calculations. The proposed calculation method can be used in the design of modern subcritical and supercritical boilers, in which the temperature of the live steam is very high. Very careful and precise calculations of steam and tube walls temperature along the steam flow path will avoid the overheating of the tube material.

[1]  William Liu.  The dynamic creep rupture of a secondary superheater tube in a 43 MW coal-fired boiler by the decarburization and multilayer oxide scale buildup on both sides , 2015 .

[2]  Junghwan Kim,et al.  Prediction-based feedforward control of superheated steam temperature of a power plant , 2015 .

[3]  R. Kouhikamali,et al.  Convective heat transfer in a mixture of cooling water and superheated steam , 2012 .

[4]  Antonios Tourlidakis,et al.  Study of slagging and fouling mechanisms in a lignite-fired power plant , 2015 .

[5]  V. Ganapathy.  16 – Heat recovery steam generators: performance management and improvement , 2011 .

[6]  Amitava Gupta,et al.  Optimal control strategy for minimization of exergy destruction in boiler superheater , 2013 .

[7]  Jarruwat Charoensuk,et al.  Numerical analysis of heat transfer and flow field around cross-flow heat exchanger tube with fouling , 2010 .

[8]  J. Taler,et al.  Solving Direct and Inverse Heat Conduction Problems , 2006 .

[9]  B. R. Baliga,et al.  A NEW FINITE-ELEMENT FORMULATION FOR CONVECTION-DIFFUSION PROBLEMS , 1980 .

[10]  S. Karlsson,et al.  Reducing high-temperature corrosion on high-alloyed stainless steel superheaters by co-combustion of municipal sewage sludge in a fluidised bed boiler , 2015 .

[11]  Harun Bilirgen,et al.  Slagging in PC boilers and developing mitigation strategies , 2014 .

[12]  Y. Na,et al.  Research on the heat transfer model of platen heating surface of 300 MW circulating fluidized bed boilers , 2012 .

[13]  Mingtian Xu,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of waste heat power generation system , 2010 .

[14]  Panagiotis Grammelis,et al.  Decoupled CFD simulation of furnace and heat exchangers in a lignite utility boiler , 2014 .

[15]  Dawid Taler,et al.  Mathematical modeling and control of plate fin and tube heat exchangers , 2015 .

[16]  Dawid Taler,et al.  Determination of start-up curves for a boiler with natural circulation based on the analysis of stress distribution in critical pressure components , 2015 .

[17]  Dawid Taler,et al.  Analysis of temperature and stress distribution of superheater tubes after attemperation or sootblower activation , 2013 .

[18]  Dawid Taler,et al.  Thermal simulation of superheaters taking into account the processes occurring on the side of the steam and flue gas , 2015 .

[19]  Moh’d A. Al-Nimr,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of a packed bed energy storage system , 1996 .

[20]  Enrique Teruel,et al.  Towards soot-blowing optimization in superheaters , 2013 .

[21]  V. Gnielinski.  On heat transfer in tubes , 2013 .

[22]  Honghi Tran,et al.  Numerical modeling of fine particle and deposit formation in a recovery boiler , 2014 .

[23]  A. Movahedi-Rad,et al.  Failure analysis of superheater tube , 2015 .

[24]  V. Gnielinski,et al.  Corrigendum to “On heat transfer in tubes” [International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 63 (2013) 134–140] , 2015 .

[25]  Shuiguang Tong,et al.  Thermodynamic performance analysis and algorithm model of multi-pressure heat recovery steam generators (HRSG) based on heat exchangers layout , 2014 .

[26]  S. Izadpanah,et al.  A numerical study on thermal behavior of a D-type water-cooled steam boiler , 2012 .

[27]  A. Bejan,et al.  Power from a hot gas stream with multiple superheaters and reheaters , 2013 .

[28]  H. Shokouhmand,et al.  Failure analysis and retrofitting of superheater tubes in utility boiler , 2015 .

[29]  Moh’d A. Al-Nimr,et al.  Dynamic thermal behaviour of cooling towers , 1998 .

[30]  Nikolaos Samaras,et al.  Simulation of a coal-fired power plant using mathematical programming algorithms in order to optimize its efficiency , 2012 .

[31]  A. Pavan,et al.  Estimation of residual life of boiler tubes using steamside oxide scale thickness , 2013 .

[32]  R. Bahrampoury,et al.  Optimization of fire tube heat recovery steam generators for cogeneration plants through genetic algorithm , 2010 .