Understanding Online Information Disclosure As a Privacy Calculus Adjusted by Exchange Fairness

Current studies on information privacy fail to explain widely observed contradictions between online consumers’ privacy concern (treated as a gener al personality trait) and online information disclosure. These contradictions occur because situation -specific factors are not taken into account . This paper contributes to the literature on information privacy by theorizing and empirically testing how inf ormation disclosure is driven by competing situation -specific benefits and risk factors . The results of this study indicate that , in the context of an e -commerce transaction with an unfamiliar vendor, information disclosure is the result of competing influ ences of exchange benefits and two types of privacy beliefs (privacy protection belief and privacy risk belief). In addition, the effect of monetary rewards is dependent upon the fairness of information exchange. Monetary rewards could undermine informatio n disclosure when information collected has low relevance to the purpose of the e -commerce transaction .

[1]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization , 2006, MIS Q..

[2]  W. Ryan,et al.  Privacy and freedom: Alan F. Westin Atheneum Publishers, $10 , 1967 .

[3]  Andrew J. Rohm,et al.  Consumer Privacy and Name Removal across Direct Marketing Channels: Exploring Opt-In and Opt-Out Alternatives , 2000 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[5]  R. Laufer,et al.  Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Developmental Theory , 1977 .

[6]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[7]  Kenneth Laudon.  Markets and Privacy , 1996, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[8]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Information Privacy in the Marketspace: Implications for the Commercial Uses of Anonymity on the Web , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  Nancy J. Lightner.  What users want in e-commerce design: effects of age, education and income , 2003, Ergonomics.

[11]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[13]  Thomas W. Dunfee,et al.  Toward A Unified Conception Of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory , 1994 .

[14]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Impacts of User Privacy Preferences on Personalized Systems , 2004, Designing Personalized User Experiences in eCommerce.

[15]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations , 1983 .

[16]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[17]  Miriam J. Metzger.  Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Dianna Lynn Stone.  The effects of the valence of outcomes for providing data and the perceived relevance of the data requested on privacy-related behaviors, beliefs, and attitudes , 1981 .

[19]  Brian C. Tietje.  When Do Rewards Have Enhancement Effects? An Availability Valence Approach , 2002 .

[20]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[21]  Alexandra J. Campbell.  Relationship marketing in consumer markets , 1997 .

[22]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  William T. Ross,et al.  Social Contracts and Marketing Ethics , 1999 .

[24]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[25]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Disclosure : Motivators and Measurements , 2006 .

[26]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[27]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Markets and privacy , 1993, CACM.

[29]  M. Culnan,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[30]  R. Bies,et al.  Consumer Privacy: Balancing Economic and Justice Considerations , 2003 .

[31]  Kai Lung Hui,et al.  Online Information Privacy: Measuring the Cost-Benefit Trade-Off , 2002, ICIS.

[32]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  J. Phelps,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information , 2000 .